I honestly was just trying to be helpful.
I even looked in the other forums for a similar situation to try to help OP. Oh well.
@lord999 I looked in the premed forum yesterday because there was a post about institutional action and OP wanted to know if it would need to be reported to the medical school. Goro and the rest were saying that the poster in that forum would need to report it. I can PM you the link to that thread.
I'd find it curious as there is no constituent duty. Most FERPA offices will not report issues due to getting a Title VI or IX on their hands afterwards unless it was something big enough to involve the police (in which case that is an official action). Just saying from both a Big 10 and PAC-12 perspective, we have actually tried to get prospective student (and even current study) past disciplinary history without success on those grounds. When we have had to release, we have had to notify the party (the student) himself/herself as our Office of Legal Counsel has a very expansive view of what is "educational information" that is personally identifiable, the Health and Safety exception notwithstanding.
Basically, let's say I'm Phi Delta Chi, and I was personally responsible and hazed the hell out of a student hospitalizing him. I think we can agree that I would be in serious trouble if charges were pressed. They weren't, and I just took an expulsion for the matter. Should I apply to another school, I could place that I was expelled and no, I won't sign the release permitting the application institution for a FERPA release. The applying school has to basically decide without that criteria (in which case, why the hell would that school say yes).
By the way
@PharmD500, saw the other thread, but the circumstances differ enough because it is sexual assault, which has a specific Title IX implication. For AMCAS, that is *supposed* to be reported, but it has slipped through. That is voluntary, not required by the institution. In fact as stated above, even when we do have a self-report, good luck getting that from the institution where the offense occured without a FERPA waiver unless it was sexual (Title IX) or racism (Title VI) in nature.
If you're wondering why we have the Sexual Harassment Panda (Sexual Harassment - obvious) and the Ice Cream Truck Man (Racial Harassment - not so obvious) training, the Feds can get very annoyed about handling those issues.
Where this Op reports it or not, if it is later discovered, the Board and the School can take punitive action even retroactively if they have intentionally asked for it. The Board also can temporarily suspend a license pursuant to getting a FERPA waiver (I have seen AZ do this for a frat hazing in undergrad). If this Op is going to a PharmCAS-school, they are obligated to self-report. Whether or not the Board wants to know is their business. Usually no for in-school actions that do not get law enforcement involved.
Sorry to beat a dead horse, but it's an interesting play to whether or not one does reveal. Let's just say that there is a certain pharmacist (2005) on the register in AZ that copped to a crime that everyone of us knew was a lie but would place her in treatment and not dismissal. There is a right way and a sneaky way to do it.
By the way, this line about "opening minds and expanding horizons" when teaching? Bull$*@. You spend much more time on bureaucratic paperwork either yours or becoming yours:
1. Becoming a professional beggar for the rich organization of your choice (NIH, NSF, HH, RWJF).
2. Student affairs like this
3. Faculty committee fights like Space and Tenure and Promotion
I wonder how clinical track works where you don't have to spend as much time in service and just maintain a practice.