Unhappy unless in Private Practice?

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

finalpsychyear

Full Member
7+ Year Member
Joined
Nov 3, 2015
Messages
1,822
Reaction score
1,851
Now I know there may be a selection bias. I have seen a trend on these forums (whooper, fonzie, sunlioness, to name a few) who ultimately got fed up essentially in work environments where they were working for someone else. I apologize in advance if that wasn't the full story or i misunderstood. My point being I just have a hard time picturing most psychiatrists actually being satisfied in a model where there is some bachelors degree with some meaningless title essentially ordering the M.D. that they need to see this many patients or do things this way or need to see patients arriving hours late etc.

As a resident I have experienced this at our VA clinic where the scheduler essentially bosses around all the residents. At the state clinic as a third year, I saw first hand a few of the therapists complaining to an attending about a resident to who they felt needed to prescribe a certain medication or more of it etc

Hearing all the CMHC stories I feel some aspect of this happens to physicians there as well and it just boils my blood to hear about it. Of course the notion of starting PP is scary and maybe a large part of why those steer clear or the academic minded want jobs with that type of background. I get that. I'm ok with making less money if that entitles me to full autonomy. Is my experience very one sided or do others really enjoy their non-PP jobs?
 
PP is a lot more forgiving and patient than being in an employee such as with a state, federal, local or megacorp. The question is, do you want to have control and are ok with this, or do you need the security of a system?

You'll have to soul search on this.
 
A lot of people do a bit of both and move around. Jobs are also not as stark as 100% facility vs. 100% PP. e.g. large private group practices can feel more like a facility job, and small facility jobs with a high RVU component might feel more like a PP job. Don't be all "black and white" cognitively distorted about it. Life isn't that extreme.
 
If I did private practice right after residency I wouldn't have been happy either.

I had a lot of curiosity that was still left un-satiated. I had to do fellowship and work with literally some of the best people in the country to get that part fulfilled. Some of the feelings of lack of fulfillment was I wanted to know what it was like working with the best, how I'd compare with them, wanting to be in a very good academic institution, being able to see if I could handle it, wanting to learn how to detect malingering and treat borderline PD cause with my training after residency I wasn't satisfied with where I was at.

I also had to see in front-of-my-face the lack of efficiency and waste that happened in state systems and in academia to know that if I entered private practice I wouldn't have a grass is greener on the other side attitude.

I felt my academic career plateaued. I enjoy teaching but the last place I was at didn't let me exploit that strength despite that my teaching scores were at the top of the medical school. Students were specifically asking to be with me over other psychiatrists. Despite that I was positioned to be in jail most of the week where I did not have exposure to students. I also brought in lots of cash to the department but they weren't exploiting that ability either. I could've made them more and in a manner I would've found satisfying (e.g. I had days where I had no patients to see because the office staff were incompetent, I had days where all I did was play Facebook games while wanting to see patients). Another problem was the way the department had their residents do notes those residents had 30 days to do a discharge summary. I found this policy incredibly counter-productive and led to worse care but each time I brought it up the person above me ignored my concerns. Work-wise I'd sometimes literally get 50 discharge summaries out of nowhere that I had to sign. At U of Cincinnati I used to only have to online stamp them. At my last place I had to write an attestation note that took me about 7 minutes to write per patient so out of no where and beyond my control I could get literally up to 6 hours of notes to sign and attest.

So the only thing I could've done that I hadn't done yet was career level research and I was open to that but I couldn't do that at my last place the way they set me up cause I was at the local jail most of the time and to do research I would've had to have been on campus at the university most of the time.

There were other things incredibly bothering me with my last job that I will not mention due to wanting to be diplomatic. I knew if I left to private practice I'd be making a lot more money and I would've been happier.

I mentioned this in another thread but don't look at it as simply academic vs private. Some academic places are better than others. Some private places are better or worse. In St. Louis the pay of a psychiatrist is high due to the incredible lack of psychiatrists. I have some patients literally drive over 4 hours to see me. Most of the residents who train here don't stay here.

In Cincinnati my academic situation was much better and the private practice pay was less, so I would've stayed in academia over there. Many more residents who trained there stayed there and the shortage of psychiatrists was nothing in comparison.

Another reason why I am happy (at least so far) with my current job is that I am at a practice that is literally the best within likely hundreds of miles. I work with many award winning psychiatrists all of whom are very good. Like me all of them were academic at some point but left because despite being good they couldn't handle the politics of academia. It's a pet peeve of mine to work with terrible doctors.
 
Last edited:
Not a panacea, but setting limits in the contract regarding # of patients, charting time, etc. , and maintaining these boundaries once you start working is probably the best way to maintain sanity at a cmhc. If you are in a high need area the place probably can't afford to push you around.
 
Is my experience very one sided or do others really enjoy their non-PP jobs?
I'm about to finish fellowship, so I clearly don't know how I'd enjoy any job. However, I imagine I would enjoy a non-PP job as it allows me to worry about fewer things. There's a lot of business things and legal things that go into a practice, and I won't have to worry about these things. Why would I think I would even be good at that stuff anyway?
 
So speaking to a supervisor of mine, he was very against the idea of private practice and said the better bet was just to work for someone else.
Then he told me that to even think about doing PP i would have to do the following:
1. Med license (obviously) which is the only thing i have currently.
2. Acquire an address for a business location as everything will require this information
2. DEA and/or DEA-x if wanting to prescribe subox which itself requires a separate app and enrolling in some course costing hundreds of dollars.
3. Malpractice
4.Obtain hospital privileges as insurances require it to get paneled
5. Request a token to get something called CAHQ or something like that
6. Fill out additional paperwork from those insurance panels requiring more than just that universal application
7. Medicare application if you decide to enroll

Jaw is dropped:wow:. Don't think I have enough time to realistically do all this before lets say august. Guess I'm starting to see why almost no one starts out PP unless maybe doing cash only-part time with a side job.:whoa:
 
you do realize you would have to do most of this anyway regardless of where you work? and it's free for residents to do Suboxone training through APA, AAAP or whatever other sponsoring organizations if you're a member. at least in pp these are tax deductible. new psychiatrists usually have a 50% discount on malpractice insurance which is about as cheap as it gets for medical specialties (get occurrence based malpractice). all the insurance penal long you'd have to do anyway at least you could opt to do cash only in pp.

most residents will start the process of setting up pp in Jan of PGY-4 year if not before though some stuff you can't do until later. you forgot you will also have to set up as an LLC or sole proprietor? did you receive any teaching on setting up a pp during your training? do you have any pp mentors or recent grads in pp who are available to provide advice? at most.larger programs it is common for at least a few residents to go into pp. our residency office keeps a guide for residents on this topic. it's not for everyone but for some people the effort is well worth it
 
1. Work for a small private practice and take notes in detail about what works and what doesn't.
2. Repeat 1
3. Open your own

Folks who jump into private practice immediately out of residency tend to fall two two camps: folks who don't do well and folks who could be doing MUCH better.

Unless you're really willing to pour a whole lot of time learning things you have almost no training in (yes, we all have been to one or two PowerPoint slideshows), you are leaving money on the table.

Your average hair stylist puts WAY more time and investment into research prior to opening their first shop than your average psychiatrist.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
you do realize you would have to do most of this anyway regardless of where you work? and it's free for residents to do Suboxone training through APA, AAAP or whatever other sponsoring organizations if you're a member. at least in pp these are tax deductible. new psychiatrists usually have a 50% discount on malpractice insurance which is about as cheap as it gets for medical specialties (get occurrence based malpractice). all the insurance penal long you'd have to do anyway at least you could opt to do cash only in pp.

most residents will start the process of setting up pp in Jan of PGY-4 year if not before though some stuff you can't do until later. you forgot you will also have to set up as an LLC or sole proprietor? did you receive any teaching on setting up a pp during your training? do you have any pp mentors or recent grads in pp who are available to provide advice? at most.larger programs it is common for at least a few residents to go into pp. our residency office keeps a guide for residents on this topic. it's not for everyone but for some people the effort is well worth it

Solid advice. No training about PP. I will look into past residents doing this but dont think anyone is in the area who is doing PP from our program. Also, LLC i know is better but takes longer to set up so i thought if i do go down this path i'd start as sole prop and after 6 months if its going well consider doing the LLC. Thank you alot for your input. Are you in PP yourself?
 
Solid advice. No training about PP. I will look into past residents doing this but dont think anyone is in the area who is doing PP from our program. Also, LLC i know is better but takes longer to set up so i thought if i do go down this path i'd start as sole prop and after 6 months if its going well consider doing the LLC. Thank you alot for your input. Are you in PP yourself?
Ask your program director for names of doctors in private practice who would be interested in providing mentorship or guidance. You may find someone who wants you to join their private practice.
 
My suggestion is reflect on previous work settings and think of all the things you said yes to. Are you going to keep saying yes? For how long? Now ask yourself the question "by saying yes what am I saying no to?". If you run your own practice the same questions apply.

How much risk do you want to take? As others have mentioned, your risk can be significantly reduced by joining an existing practice and modeling their actions. But if the risk does not bother you and you are able to see wins in failures then go ahead and explore to your heart's content.


Sent from my iPhone using SDN mobile app
 
Last edited:
Speaking of failures. I get around 5 or more failures for every 1 win in my practice. Every business has to experiment to survive. You need to think like a scientist and conduct the experiment. In the end, time answers all questions and reality will be your mentor. I am constantly revising my business plans, creating new ones and throwing away old ones. Winning and losing. One thing is for sure, I am constantly saying yes to revising my plans and no to other things in Psychiatry! Some days it would be nice to not feel responsible for running a company.


Sent from my iPhone using SDN mobile app
 
Speaking of failures. I get around 5 or more failures for every 1 win in my practice. Every business has to experiment to survive. You need to think like a scientist and conduct the experiment. In the end, time answers all questions and reality will be your mentor. I am constantly revising my business plans, creating new ones and throwing away old ones. Winning and losing. One thing is for sure, I am constantly saying yes to revising my plans and no to other things in Psychiatry! Some days it would be nice to not feel responsible for running a company.
Agreed 100%. This is also a strategy for therapy, IMO. You never know if one therapy intervention will work with that individual. If it doesn't, try something else, revise strategies, etc. And have a deep well to draw from.
 
Not a panacea, but setting limits in the contract regarding # of patients, charting time, etc. , and maintaining these boundaries once you start working is probably the best way to maintain sanity at a cmhc. If you are in a high need area the place probably can't afford to push you around.

This is very important for salaried jobs that many physicians ignore. Set firm limits in writing, and go home after you meet them. If the facility wants more work later, advise them to hire an additional psychiatrist or that you will agree to amend your contract for bonus pay above your normal rate.
 
How is this so different from anywhere in life? Everyone has conflict between autonomy and dependence. It's more about knowing yourself and knowing your limits. Many people in PP are very frustrated at their challenges in running a business, scheduling patients, making phone calls, doing prior authorizations, etc.
 
This is very important for salaried jobs that many physicians ignore. Set firm limits in writing, and go home after you meet them. If the facility wants more work later, advise them to hire an additional psychiatrist or that you will agree to amend your contract for bonus pay above your normal rate.

Yeah, one of the psychiatrists at our local CMHC always gets 30 minutes for followups, no exceptions. Granted, if she were to quit, multiple programs they have the contract for would basically have to close, but still, she took advantage of having them over a barrel.
 
Yeah, one of the psychiatrists at our local CMHC always gets 30 minutes for followups, no exceptions. Granted, if she were to quit, multiple programs they have the contract for would basically have to close, but still, she took advantage of having them over a barrel.

It's sad that providing a minimal quality of care for patients comes only from having employers "over a barrel." We as a profession really need to push back on this.
 
It's sad that providing a minimal quality of care for patients comes only from having employers "over a barrel." We as a profession really need to push back on this.
That's kinda what PP is - pushing back against bad employed situations. When employers get desperate to hire physicians (because more of us are working for ourselves/in partnerships with other docs), its much easier to make demands on employers.
 
I have no issue working for someone else. I did solo and hated it. I prefer to work for someone else.

But you need to very carefully vet who that someone else is.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
 
It's sad that providing a minimal quality of care for patients comes only from having employers "over a barrel." We as a profession really need to push back on this.

I agree, and I'm not sure of the particular situation, but I don't think that it's necessarily inherently driven by sacrifice of patient care. In a CMHC setting, you have a large cohort of patients that you are underfunded to care for appropriately. What's better? Doing a really good job on a subset of them, or doing an OK job on all of them? Much different if patients have other choices.
 
I agree, and I'm not sure of the particular situation, but I don't think that it's necessarily inherently driven by sacrifice of patient care. In a CMHC setting, you have a large cohort of patients that you are underfunded to care for appropriately. What's better? Doing a really good job on a subset of them, or doing an OK job on all of them? Much different if patients have other choices.

If the problem is having such limited resources that you are struggling to not fall below the standard of care, will such benevolence be forgiven in court when something falls through the cracks?


Sent from my iPhone using SDN mobile app
 
If the problem is having such limited resources that you are struggling to not fall below the standard of care, will such benevolence be forgiven in court when something falls through the cracks?


Sent from my iPhone using SDN mobile app

Nope. And it's a great point. Although, I do think standard of care is judged based on your practicing environment, no?

I wonder how much the liability would fall on the CMHC anyway. If it's just you, hard to imagine they'd be too concerned.
 
Speaking of failures. I get around 5 or more failures for every 1 win in my practice. Every business has to experiment to survive. You need to think like a scientist and conduct the experiment. In the end, time answers all questions and reality will be your mentor. I am constantly revising my business plans, creating new ones and throwing away old ones. Winning and losing. One thing is for sure, I am constantly saying yes to revising my plans and no to other things in Psychiatry! Some days it would be nice to not feel responsible for running a company.


Sent from my iPhone using SDN mobile app

Appreciate the response. Your posts were very informative when you started your cash-only business. I like the failure plus motto. If you continue to fail at least your still trying. The 5:1 ratio sounds good. At first I thought you were referencing patient success which would be tougher in a cash only practice. Will you ever go full time PP or always keep some employed job as well?
 
Nope. And it's a great point. Although, I do think standard of care is judged based on your practicing environment, no?

I wonder how much the liability would fall on the CMHC anyway. If it's just you, hard to imagine they'd be too concerned.

I admit that I document in such a way as to throw my employer under the bus should it come to it. Not intentionally to get them, really. But just to protect myself. I don't know if it would actually really help though. Stuff like, "Patient heretofore unknown to me presents twenty minutes late for a fifteen minute medication visit after having been lost to follow up for six months. He reports that in the interim, he has been hospitalized in two facilities and that his medications were changed, but he presents no documentation in support of such. Etc."
 
I admit that I document in such a way as to throw my employer under the bus should it come to it. Not intentionally to get them, really. But just to protect myself. I don't know if it would actually really help though. Stuff like, "Patient heretofore unknown to me presents twenty minutes late for a fifteen minute medication visit after having been lost to follow up for six months. He reports that in the interim, he has been hospitalized in two facilities and that his medications were changed, but he presents no documentation in support of such. Etc."
You have to document to protect yourself. When I was working at a CMHC I would also document conversations about problematic or ethical issues with administration. Usually in a follow up email "just to clarify" the potentially risky policy and practice that they are instituting and what my objections were to it. Just remember, they won't hesitate to throw any of us under the bus all day long.
 
You have to document to protect yourself. When I was working at a CMHC I would also document conversations about problematic or ethical issues with administration. Usually in a follow up email "just to clarify" the potentially risky policy and practice that they are instituting and what my objections were to it. Just remember, they won't hesitate to throw any of us under the bus all day long.


Ah yes , the "I am going to send you this email summarizing that meeting we just had because I don't want you to be able to deny later the s**t you said because past experience has shown me that if I do not I will be bushwhacked with it down the road at your soonest convenience" gambit. A favorite of mine.
 
I admit that I document in such a way as to throw my employer under the bus should it come to it. Not intentionally to get them, really. But just to protect myself. I don't know if it would actually really help though. Stuff like, "Patient heretofore unknown to me presents twenty minutes late for a fifteen minute medication visit after having been lost to follow up for six months. He reports that in the interim, he has been hospitalized in two facilities and that his medications were changed, but he presents no documentation in support of such. Etc."

I would document like that (because it's how it happened) but at the end of the day you are the one with the license and you are the one attorneys will go after. Documenting how inadequate the assessment was, even if due to employer constraints, would probably not hurt the employer.

That said in patient populations like these I imagine lawsuits are pretty rare. Many of these patients don't have anyone who cares enough to bring a suit if something goes wrong.
 
PP is a lot more forgiving and patient than being in an employee such as with a state, federal, local or megacorp. The question is, do you want to have control and are ok with this, or do you need the security of a system?

You'll have to soul search on this.

I am trying to spend as much time with any faculty and previous residents to learn as much as i can about PP before I try this on my own later this year. Do you or anyone know if as a solo Private practice doctor who is not doing an LLC or incorporting if i need a TYPE 2 NPI for MEDICARE or does my type 1 work for them? I want to give it a 6 month trial and i know the legal advantages here of incorporating but if this is a big failure i dont want to invest more $$ until i have some idea if it will work or not.
 
I am trying to spend as much time with any faculty and previous residents to learn as much as i can about PP before I try this on my own later this year. Do you or anyone know if as a solo Private practice doctor who is not doing an LLC or incorporting if i need a TYPE 2 NPI for MEDICARE or does my type 1 work for them? I want to give it a 6 month trial and i know the legal advantages here of incorporating but if this is a big failure i dont want to invest more $$ until i have some idea if it will work or not.

Create a S-corp if you're going to do 1099 work. If you're employed on a W2, don't bother. The office will have information in getting on insurance plans. Avoid medicaid.
 
Create a S-corp if you're going to do 1099 work. If you're employed on a W2, don't bother. The office will have information in getting on insurance plans. Avoid medicaid.

So I'm clear your advice is to form an S-Corp after I decide in 6 months if i will continue to do solo private practice rather than an LLC? There is a part time VA job nearby for 2 days/week that i might take but it is not available till late october.

Also, I'm doing this on my own so I'll be applying myself (CAQH) to every insurance except medicaid and when i see their payment amounts I' won't sign the ones that are paying below 10% of medicare rates. I won't know that till i've done the tedious paperwork. Luckily I have a super light schedule from now till graduation. Applying to medicare hopefully doesn't sign me up for medicaid...fingers crossed. Thanks for the response!
 
So I'm clear your advice is to form an S-Corp after I decide in 6 months if i will continue to do solo private practice rather than an LLC? There is a part time VA job nearby for 2 days/week that i might take but it is not available till late october.

Also, I'm doing this on my own so I'll be applying myself (CAQH) to every insurance except medicaid and when i see their payment amounts I' won't sign the ones that are paying below 10% of medicare rates. I won't know that till i've done the tedious paperwork. Luckily I have a super light schedule from now till graduation. Applying to medicare hopefully doesn't sign me up for medicaid...fingers crossed. Thanks for the response!

Talk with an accountant.
 
I thought the idea was that you shouldn't sign anyone who pays less than medicare, unless you also want to medicare to pay less. Or is that only billed cost?


I really have no idea. Im finding out from more and more people that a good amount of insurance does not even pay medicare rates. Especially as i will be solo i have no negotiating provider a large group may have.

I'll go ahead and probably apply to like 10 panels. Not sure how many that CAPQ thing will get me into alone. Then at some point those panels will have to send me the amounts they are willing to pay. I will then have to see what is resonable. and only take those ones. The cynic in me says out of those 10 about 2 will pay better than medicare, 4 will pay medicare or 10% less, and 4 will pay >10% less than medicare. I really don't want medicaid pts but i might enroll just in case to have it as an option. In my state medicaid pays $40 for 99213, $60 for a level 4.

Plus, why would an insurance company want to pay more than medicare anyways unless a large group is not accepting them and they are desperate for coverage.:shrug:
 
I really have no idea. Im finding out from more and more people that a good amount of insurance does not even pay medicare rates. Especially as i will be solo i have no negotiating provider a large group may have.

I'll go ahead and probably apply to like 10 panels. Not sure how many that CAPQ thing will get me into alone. Then at some point those panels will have to send me the amounts they are willing to pay. I will then have to see what is resonable. and only take those ones. The cynic in me says out of those 10 about 2 will pay better than medicare, 4 will pay medicare or 10% less, and 4 will pay >10% less than medicare. I really don't want medicaid pts but i might enroll just in case to have it as an option. In my state medicaid pays $40 for 99213, $60 for a level 4.

Plus, why would an insurance company want to pay more than medicare anyways unless a large group is not accepting them and they are desperate for coverage.:shrug:
It's a little concerning that you are planning to go into private practice and don't have any idea of how very basic aspects of practice work.
private insurance companies generally pay more (often a lot more) than medicare. Why do you think so many physicians are scared of a single payer/medicare-for-all plan? because they fear it would significantly slash their reimbursement. If 80% of plans paid the same or much worse then don't you think physicians would be clamoring for single payer? Also while it is true that larger groups have more negotiating power with insurance companies, this is usually not much of a problem for psychiatry as most hospitals aren't keen on providing outpatient psychiatry services and psychiatrists tend to work in office-based settings (office based = private practice typically some model of solo or small group).

they pay a lot more than medicare because people pay a lot of money for private insurance and they need to be able to justify that by the services they provide. In general mental health gets the short shrift but as E&M codes are used across specialties this usually means there might be variance in how much is paid for psychotherapy but the E&M codes will pay decently. At the same time, insurance companies will often set their own amount for what an RVU is worth, and then the reimbursement for a given code will be based on how many RVUs that code is worth per the AMA's CPT book.

In terms of whether to take medicare or not - This is not simply about reimbursement, but also the kind of patient population you work with. Generally medicare patients are either 1) over 65 2) on SSDI 3) have ESRD or 4) have ALS. 1 and 2 are obviously the vast majority. you might not want to treat geropsych patients. patients on SSDI may have much less incentive to get well and thus may not be satisfying to treat in a private practice setting. OTOH if you have your heart set on doing psychodynamic/psychoanalytic treatment and won't be able to get enough patients otherwise, you might be willing to take medicare patients to fill your practice and do what you love even if it means taking a hit to your income.

Patients on medicaid or obamacare will often have alot more psychosocial issues, may be on SSI or seeking disability, tend to be alot sicker, may have more medical comorbidities. They are much more likely to need integrated care and case management services. They may be less than ideal psychotherapy patients. As such they are not typically good patients for a solo private practice.

In terms of which insurances to take - this is partly based on what they reimburse or how much of headache they are to deal with. UnitedHealthCare (and its carveout optum) are one of the worst in terms of mental healthcare coverage and unlawful restrictions on care and tend to pay poorly. Aetna is another one that has been sued several times for denial of coverage. You can get a good idea of what insurances pay the best by looking up private practice psychiatrists in your area and seeing which insurances they take. Usually it is better to take a limited number (say 2 or 3) insurances that are known to pay decently. The exception to this is if you are planning to have a high-volume med management practice seeing patients for 10-15 minutes visits, in which case you want to take as many insurances as you can as your income will be through seeing as many patients as you can rather than what you get per patient. But in that scenario you would definitely want to have someone doing your billing (and that could be a lot of work), and want to hire staff like a secretary or share those resources with other psychiatrists. One common model of practice is for several psychiatrists to have solo practices in a building but share those resources. High volume practices have will increase your risk of malpractice claims however - as it means you will be seeing more patients, at longer intervals, for shorter, and will know them less well. It would probably not be feasible to screen them.

On the other hand if you have a smaller practice - particularly a psychotherapy based one, or where you are seeing med management patients for longer (say up to an hour) and more regularly, you may want to screen all the patients yourself. Screening would include their ability to pay, their suitability for treatment in an office-based setting, that they fit with your philosophy style, and they are patients you want to see (for example you might want to screen out patients who have just been discharged from the hospital, who are chronically suicidal, who are court-ordered for treatment, who are on multiple controlled substances). You may also decide to have a cash only practice. Away from the NE, it is true that most people expect to use their insurance but if you wanted to you could have a sliding scale to accomodate a range of patients. I have heard some psychiatrists say that they will charge more for patients who seem more difficult/annoying during the screening. So you can think to yourself, "how much would be worth my while to see this patient?" You want to have some sort of rule for no-shows or cancellations <24-48hrs. This could be a nominal fee or it could be the entire amount of the visit. keeping a credit card on file for these purposes would be important. You may also want to charge for patient calls >5mins. One way of doing that is prorated by the hourly charge. You can do this in an insurance based practice (even for medicare patients as medicare does not cover phone calls). you can't charge for prior auths though (or shouldn't) with the exception of it is because the patient is insisting on some version of the drug that requires PA when something else would have been fine and is causing grief for no reason.

I would imagine there must be psychiatrists in private practice in your area who are on the volunteer faculty of your program who you could talk to about all these sorts of things.
you also want to talk to an attorney. They can help with the legal aspects of setting up a practice, as well as helping draft forms for running a practice (i.e. consent forms). You need to come up with a policy for dealing with suicidal patients, how you handle out of hours problems (for example whether you'll have an answering service or be available yourself), and coverage for when you are away. Although a lot of psychiatrists have a "go to the ER" out of hours or when they are away, this is unethical and frowned upon as well as being inappropriate except for emergencies.You also want to talk to an accountant.

The other issue to think about is documentation. Older psychiatrists might still just have handwritten notes. Others simple use word. Others might use Practicefusion or Valant. Regardless you want to make sure what you do is HIPAA compliant.

point is you have a lot to think about and it would be very foolish to think you just hang up your own shingle without consulting a lot of people and thinking it through. It may be very rewarding to have a private practice for the some, but for others it's not worth the headache.
 
It's a little concerning that you are planning to go into private practice and don't have any idea of how very basic aspects of practice work.
private insurance companies generally pay more (often a lot more) than medicare. Why do you think so many physicians are scared of a single payer/medicare-for-all plan? because they fear it would significantly slash their reimbursement. If 80% of plans paid the same or much worse then don't you think physicians would be clamoring for single payer? Also while it is true that larger groups have more negotiating power with insurance companies, this is usually not much of a problem for psychiatry as most hospitals aren't keen on providing outpatient psychiatry services and psychiatrists tend to work in office-based settings (office based = private practice typically some model of solo or small group).

they pay a lot more than medicare because people pay a lot of money for private insurance and they need to be able to justify that by the services they provide. In general mental health gets the short shrift but as E&M codes are used across specialties this usually means there might be variance in how much is paid for psychotherapy but the E&M codes will pay decently. At the same time, insurance companies will often set their own amount for what an RVU is worth, and then the reimbursement for a given code will be based on how many RVUs that code is worth per the AMA's CPT book.

In terms of whether to take medicare or not - This is not simply about reimbursement, but also the kind of patient population you work with. Generally medicare patients are either 1) over 65 2) on SSDI 3) have ESRD or 4) have ALS. 1 and 2 are obviously the vast majority. you might not want to treat geropsych patients. patients on SSDI may have much less incentive to get well and thus may not be satisfying to treat in a private practice setting. OTOH if you have your heart set on doing psychodynamic/psychoanalytic treatment and won't be able to get enough patients otherwise, you might be willing to take medicare patients to fill your practice and do what you love even if it means taking a hit to your income.

Patients on medicaid or obamacare will often have alot more psychosocial issues, may be on SSI or seeking disability, tend to be alot sicker, may have more medical comorbidities. They are much more likely to need integrated care and case management services. They may be less than ideal psychotherapy patients. As such they are not typically good patients for a solo private practice.

In terms of which insurances to take - this is partly based on what they reimburse or how much of headache they are to deal with. UnitedHealthCare (and its carveout optum) are one of the worst in terms of mental healthcare coverage and unlawful restrictions on care and tend to pay poorly. Aetna is another one that has been sued several times for denial of coverage. You can get a good idea of what insurances pay the best by looking up private practice psychiatrists in your area and seeing which insurances they take. Usually it is better to take a limited number (say 2 or 3) insurances that are known to pay decently. The exception to this is if you are planning to have a high-volume med management practice seeing patients for 10-15 minutes visits, in which case you want to take as many insurances as you can as your income will be through seeing as many patients as you can rather than what you get per patient. But in that scenario you would definitely want to have someone doing your billing (and that could be a lot of work), and want to hire staff like a secretary or share those resources with other psychiatrists. One common model of practice is for several psychiatrists to have solo practices in a building but share those resources. High volume practices have will increase your risk of malpractice claims however - as it means you will be seeing more patients, at longer intervals, for shorter, and will know them less well. It would probably not be feasible to screen them.

On the other hand if you have a smaller practice - particularly a psychotherapy based one, or where you are seeing med management patients for longer (say up to an hour) and more regularly, you may want to screen all the patients yourself. Screening would include their ability to pay, their suitability for treatment in an office-based setting, that they fit with your philosophy style, and they are patients you want to see (for example you might want to screen out patients who have just been discharged from the hospital, who are chronically suicidal, who are court-ordered for treatment, who are on multiple controlled substances). You may also decide to have a cash only practice. Away from the NE, it is true that most people expect to use their insurance but if you wanted to you could have a sliding scale to accomodate a range of patients. I have heard some psychiatrists say that they will charge more for patients who seem more difficult/annoying during the screening. So you can think to yourself, "how much would be worth my while to see this patient?" You want to have some sort of rule for no-shows or cancellations <24-48hrs. This could be a nominal fee or it could be the entire amount of the visit. keeping a credit card on file for these purposes would be important. You may also want to charge for patient calls >5mins. One way of doing that is prorated by the hourly charge. You can do this in an insurance based practice (even for medicare patients as medicare does not cover phone calls). you can't charge for prior auths though (or shouldn't) with the exception of it is because the patient is insisting on some version of the drug that requires PA when something else would have been fine and is causing grief for no reason.

I would imagine there must be psychiatrists in private practice in your area who are on the volunteer faculty of your program who you could talk to about all these sorts of things.
you also want to talk to an attorney. They can help with the legal aspects of setting up a practice, as well as helping draft forms for running a practice (i.e. consent forms). You need to come up with a policy for dealing with suicidal patients, how you handle out of hours problems (for example whether you'll have an answering service or be available yourself), and coverage for when you are away. Although a lot of psychiatrists have a "go to the ER" out of hours or when they are away, this is unethical and frowned upon as well as being inappropriate except for emergencies.You also want to talk to an accountant.

The other issue to think about is documentation. Older psychiatrists might still just have handwritten notes. Others simple use word. Others might use Practicefusion or Valant. Regardless you want to make sure what you do is HIPAA compliant.

point is you have a lot to think about and it would be very foolish to think you just hang up your own shingle without consulting a lot of people and thinking it through. It may be very rewarding to have a private practice for the some, but for others it's not worth the headache.

Lots of great information. I have met with several different PP in the area and each one has their own insight in doing things. One recent graduate does meds/therapy only working 20 hours a week seeing 20 patients. and stated there is no money in psychiatry and i just nodded and listened. Another guy runs a med management clinic seeing 20-22 patients in 4-5 hour evening hours making 200k for his 16 hr PP side job, another guy is doing TMS plus the latter. My plan is continue working with these folks over the next 2 months and learn as much as i can. I am applying to all these panels to find out rates but don't plan to be on all of them. My plan is to eventually have a cash only business but to start with insurance first year or two. I'll be doing meds and maybe some therapy. I have worked at the VA for over 2 years in outpatient during residenciy and nearly all my patients are over 65 with several medical issues etc... i enjoy that population. In our univ clinic and state hospital clinic it is primarily medicaid so the issues you pointed out are spot on. Ideally, my life would be simpler just taking Private Insur. but i enjoy geri patients as well.

You bring up excellent points. I have been working on my own "clinic rules" covering no shows, refills because of missed visits. I got some great templates from our clinic and these practioners above. One of the docs above does Prior Auths and charges $ or makes the patient make an appointment and does it during their session. Marketing, advertising, talking to therapists, pcps that is still to come. There are 3 psych docs in the area i plan on working all over the age of 60. Not sure how receptive they would be to meet and share info. Also, many attendings tell me in the Private world to be careful as professional jealousy is common. I plan on driving a honda and to stay discreet if I'm doing well for most of my career.

Again, thank you for such a wealth of information. You must be or have been in private practice yourself.
 
Ahem, I hate to break it to splik, there are insurance companies which pay less than Medicare. Value Options and United healthcare are 2 in my area. And the demographics that I see are typically those who are retired.
 
Ahem, I hate to break it to splik, there are insurance companies which pay less than Medicare. Value Options and United healthcare are 2 in my area. And the demographics that I see are typically those who are retired.
if you read my post you will see that i specifically mentioned united as one of the companies that pays poorly.
 
Lots of great information. I have met with several different PP in the area and each one has their own insight in doing things. One recent graduate does meds/therapy only working 20 hours a week seeing 20 patients. and stated there is no money in psychiatry and i just nodded and listened. Another guy runs a med management clinic seeing 20-22 patients in 4-5 hour evening hours making 200k for his 16 hr PP side job, another guy is doing TMS plus the latter. My plan is continue working with these folks over the next 2 months and learn as much as i can. I am applying to all these panels to find out rates but don't plan to be on all of them. My plan is to eventually have a cash only business but to start with insurance first year or two. I'll be doing meds and maybe some therapy. I have worked at the VA for over 2 years in outpatient during residenciy and nearly all my patients are over 65 with several medical issues etc... i enjoy that population. In our univ clinic and state hospital clinic it is primarily medicaid so the issues you pointed out are spot on. Ideally, my life would be simpler just taking Private Insur. but i enjoy geri patients as well.

You bring up excellent points. I have been working on my own "clinic rules" covering no shows, refills because of missed visits. I got some great templates from our clinic and these practioners above. One of the docs above does Prior Auths and charges $ or makes the patient make an appointment and does it during their session. Marketing, advertising, talking to therapists, pcps that is still to come. There are 3 psych docs in the area i plan on working all over the age of 60. Not sure how receptive they would be to meet and share info. Also, many attendings tell me in the Private world to be careful as professional jealousy is common. I plan on driving a honda and to stay discreet if I'm doing well for most of my career.

Again, thank you for such a wealth of information. You must be or have been in private practice yourself.
ha no im a 4th year resident like you. i have no interest in going into pp myself - give me a salary, health insurance, pensions, sick leave and highly complex patients referred for a 5th or 6th opinion and I'll be happy. i'll do private forensic or consulting work though. maybe ill change my mind in the future
 
So speaking to a supervisor of mine, he was very against the idea of private practice and said the better bet was just to work for someone else.
Then he told me that to even think about doing PP i would have to do the following:
1. Med license (obviously) which is the only thing i have currently.
2. Acquire an address for a business location as everything will require this information
2. DEA and/or DEA-x if wanting to prescribe subox which itself requires a separate app and enrolling in some course costing hundreds of dollars.
3. Malpractice
4.Obtain hospital privileges as insurances require it to get paneled
5. Request a token to get something called CAHQ or something like that
6. Fill out additional paperwork from those insurance panels requiring more than just that universal application
7. Medicare application if you decide to enroll

1. Yes - you should have this before graduation as some states take longer than others for a full license.
2. Yes - Here's where a lot of people get out of the game, you're looking for triple-net options that will give you a location that works for the demographic you are trying to serve (You're going to want to get small-business insurance as well)
2 (well 3, I see what you did there). Yes - you should have this before graduation, apply for this the day that you get your medical license number
3. Call around for rates, make them e-mail you a quote if able, then select what you are required to have (some states have limits, some insurance companies have limits)
4. THIS IS NOT REQUIRED - There is a lot of misinformation about this, the only insurance I take doesn't require this. For credentialing, it took 1 form to explain that for coverage I would be sending patients to hospitals in the area -- that was it.
5. CAQH has saved me time on applications, it takes some legwork in the beginning, but you only have to spend that time once. Start this as soon as you get your medical license, and by graduation time, you'll be set. It's similar to the way that FCVS keeps your information stored for license applications in multiple states.
6. Yes - again for my insurance company this was about 4-5 more forms after the universal app was completed
7. Only if you decide to enroll. Be careful of this, however, because there are stipulations of accepting new patients, documentation requirements, insurance nuances if you decide to be on the roster. There's a reason that physicians are leaving the practitioner pool -- read up on these subjects before you commit.

Good luck out there.
 
1. Yes - you should have this before graduation as some states take longer than others for a full license.
2. Yes - Here's where a lot of people get out of the game, you're looking for triple-net options that will give you a location that works for the demographic you are trying to serve (You're going to want to get small-business insurance as well)
2 (well 3, I see what you did there). Yes - you should have this before graduation, apply for this the day that you get your medical license number
3. Call around for rates, make them e-mail you a quote if able, then select what you are required to have (some states have limits, some insurance companies have limits)
4. THIS IS NOT REQUIRED - There is a lot of misinformation about this, the only insurance I take doesn't require this. For credentialing, it took 1 form to explain that for coverage I would be sending patients to hospitals in the area -- that was it.
5. CAQH has saved me time on applications, it takes some legwork in the beginning, but you only have to spend that time once. Start this as soon as you get your medical license, and by graduation time, you'll be set. It's similar to the way that FCVS keeps your information stored for license applications in multiple states.
6. Yes - again for my insurance company this was about 4-5 more forms after the universal app was completed
7. Only if you decide to enroll. Be careful of this, however, because there are stipulations of accepting new patients, documentation requirements, insurance nuances if you decide to be on the roster. There's a reason that physicians are leaving the practitioner pool -- read up on these subjects before you commit.

Good luck out there.


Appreciate the clarification. Any idea how long on average it takes to panel with a CAQH accepting insurance? Also, I was planning on submitting my CAQH by May 1st as I should have the malpractice info it requires in a few days. My hope is I'd love to be paneled by several priv insurances by early to Mid July. Is this realistic?
 
I'd give it about 90 days tops (that's how long it took for a major insurance carrier where I practice). I've also had it done within 4 weeks, so I guess YMMV.
 
Paneling involves contracts. Negotiating them takes time. If you are willing to accept them as is, 1-3 months seems right. The more requests you make, the longer it may take.

1. Other than rates is their anything else that is typically negotiated?
2. These insurance contracts are renewed every year or can i opt out at anytime? I imagine you as the doctor could stop accepting new patients from a certain insurance carrier whenever you choose?

Thanks as always
 
1. Other than rates is their anything else that is typically negotiated?
2. These insurance contracts are renewed every year or can i opt out at anytime? I imagine you as the doctor could stop accepting new patients from a certain insurance carrier whenever you choose?

Thanks as always

You can typically negotiate a lot in every contract. You will want to read and understand every detail. These are not doctor-friendly contracts.
 
Just found out medicaid pays 66.00 for a level 4 E/M and 43.00 for a level 3 E/M. The add on therapy is 28 dollars for the area I will be in. I haven't decided if i will be taking this insurance or not. Fingers crossed that there are no other private insurances paying less than this when i finally get the contracts. I'm trying not to be picky.
 
Here's an example that quite literally just happened. An insurance carrier reached out to me 2 weeks ago via email about joining their panel. I did my due diligence and decided to ask for a fee scale. They sent me one via e-mail, and I called them back asking, "Is there any way to negotiate these rates with you?" The provider relations agent asked me a couple of questions about the financial set up of the practice and whether I am a medicare/medicaid provider. He then said, "I'm going to send you a list of the best rates that we can offer in your area." I just got this e-mail, and the rates were about 14 percent higher than the original fee scale they sent. I went into this knowing "the game" however. The original fees they sent were from last year sometime (summer), the 'max' rates were from January of this year. I'm guessing they review these rates at least once per year. Long story shortened, I've decided to apply to be paneled. If I hadn't known to NOT ACCEPT THE FIRST OFFER WITHOUT ASKING FOR MORE, I would not have even thought about picking them up as an insurance.

Good luck out there.
 
Ahem, I hate to break it to splik, there are insurance companies which pay less than Medicare. Value Options and United healthcare are 2 in my area. And the demographics that I see are typically those who are retired.


I'd give it about 90 days tops (that's how long it took for a major insurance carrier where I practice). I've also had it done within 4 weeks, so I guess YMMV.
You can typically negotiate a lot in every contract. You will want to read and understand every detail. These are not doctor-friendly contracts.


So I have applied to about 8 private insurance companies that all use CAQH. Each one has a 1-2 page form they require. Is this the "crazy" amount of paperwork people refer to? I found that as long as they partake in caqh it was just some basic information for each carrier? Of course the CAQH took a few hours on its own.
 
Top