if you want to make 300k and are willing to work 60-70 hours per week coming out of residency(thats a lot of hours if you are actually seeing patients all those hours and not goofing off) I wouldnt start up a private practice. I'd just pick somewhere that has decent employed salaried opps and then work another 20 hours per week doing something else. You'll probably make even more than 300k. But god that would suck.
The thing about someone like yourself(or even someone like me a few years out) just starting up a private practice is that for the first 6 months or so you're going to lose a lot of income relative to just taking a job....and thats important if you are looking at just a 3 year window for doing this. If you know you want to be an outpt pp psych for 20 years in that same location....then yeah, the growing pains for a year or even a couple years are worth it. But as a 'make money now' idea? Hell no. I'm going to take a little different approach here than my usual pessimistic self and maintain that it is *possible* to have a successful and lucrative outpt private practice that is insurance based provided the following:
1) you pick an area whose reimbursements are good. This is very important. My reimbursements here are very very low. Most of the country in fact has psych reimbursements(and where there arent mh carveouts just e/m reimbursements in general) that are middling to sucky. You think outpt internists crank out 5-6 99214s per hour because they love to? No...because thats the only way to make bank with these non-procedure codes. Don't pick one of these areas. Also be skeptical when someone says "here a 99xxx pays xxx". Ask them point blank "what was the average reimbursement YOU RECIEVED on the last 10 of these you submitted". And 8/10 times they work for the VA or a state job and are just quoting you what they heard from someone who heard or whatever. Or if they actually are self employed in pp and deal with actual reimbursement issues they are quoting you their highest paying panel, without telling you that only 15% of their patients come from that panel.
2) even when you do find a location with some good reimbursements per code, there is usually going to have to be some culling of panels and plans and getting yourself big enough(and learning how the game is played) to negotiate some decent contracts. I've worked at places before that did this, and their codes paid better than the numbers I would get if I just got on the panel tommorrow. And the thing is it took them a couple years to learn the ropes, grow, figure out how the game is played so they could go from being horribly screwed over to only being somewhat screwed over.
3) if you want to make bank you are probably going to have to practice a model that isn't going to be ideal or what you want to do. The reality is you are going to make more money seeing f/us every 20 mins than every 30 or 40 minutes. Sorry. that's life. I swear to god one of these days I'm going to see someone post that they are now scheduling patients for 2 hour followups and this is financially feasible because they bill with the new 99218 code and a 90Ipoopunicorns psychotherapy add on. Take this with a grain of salt. People I know taking insurance and making what I consider decent money are practicing high volume med mgt. Thats not neccessarily a bad thing....it just is what it is. And likewise I know a few people taking insurance and enjoying life seeing fewer patients for longer....but they aren't making the same money. They also have a very paired down overhead(but again it's hard to get your overhead too low if you are going with an insurance based model)
4) You are going to underestimate expenses and overhead. Sorry, you just are. You're not going to run a psych practice that sees a good number of patients and takes insurance panels for a very very low overhead/percentages of possible collections lost model. If you think you have found all the ways that you are going to be nickel and dimed and expenses to get a gross down to a net, you haven't....because I guarantee you there are more.