Urgent Call to Action: Billing/Coding for PNS Trials and Implants...

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

drusso

Full Member
Moderator Emeritus
Lifetime Donor
Joined
Nov 21, 1998
Messages
12,601
Reaction score
7,032
All Pain MD's need to rally around this...Urgent action required NOW.


To whom it may concern

Subject: StimQ PNS Implant Procedures (Vendor: Stimwave)

The American Hospital Association has determined that the appropriate code assignment for StimQ PNS stimulator implant is 64555. Furthermore, they specifically stipulated that it is not appropriate to report CPT code 64590 (Insertion or replacement of peripheral or gastric neurostimulator pulse generator or receiver, direct or inductive coupling) for this procedure. This latest coding guidance for this procedure results in the following:

1. We will immediately adhere to the new coding guideline issued by AHA; all StimQ PNS procedures will be coded as a 64555.

2. Reimbursement for permanent implantation of the system is reduced from an average of $22, 000 to $7, 200

3. Performing this procedure results in a net loss; the cost of the implant is $10,000 more than the total reimbursement


As you can see from the above, this unfortunate change in the coding guidance is making it unviable for the facility to continue to perform these procedures.

Members don't see this ad.
 
Members don't see this ad :)
All Pain MD's need to rally around this...Urgent action required NOW.


To whom it may concern

Subject: StimQ PNS Implant Procedures (Vendor: Stimwave)

The American Hospital Association has determined that the appropriate code assignment for StimQ PNS stimulator implant is 64555. Furthermore, they specifically stipulated that it is not appropriate to report CPT code 64590 (Insertion or replacement of peripheral or gastric neurostimulator pulse generator or receiver, direct or inductive coupling) for this procedure. This latest coding guidance for this procedure results in the following:

1. We will immediately adhere to the new coding guideline issued by AHA; all StimQ PNS procedures will be coded as a 64555.

2. Reimbursement for permanent implantation of the system is reduced from an average of $22, 000 to $7, 200

3. Performing this procedure results in a net loss; the cost of the implant is $10,000 more than the total reimbursement


As you can see from the above, this unfortunate change in the coding guidance is making it unviable for the facility to continue to perform these procedures.
I have seen this but it makes absolutely no sense to me why the AHA is pushing this line of clarity when the Stimwave system is the only of the companies that can code for 64590 or 63685.

Do they feel Stimwave's SCS system does not qualify for 63685 as well?

I assume they'll feel similarly about the Nalu system?

I also haven't seen it officially from the AHA, but their website doesn't seem to be easy to search.
 
Nalu has a tiny IPG so should be fine.
That's BS. Nalu has no ability to generate a pulse without the external device. That's no different than the Stimwave setup other than the Stimwave coupling system is integrated into the lead whereas the Nalu system requires you have to option to attach it.

Calling it an "Implantable Pulse Generator" does not make it so.

Table 2, page 10 of the PDF for Nalu's comparison
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
That's BS. Nalu has no ability to generate a pulse without the external device. That's no different than the Stimwave setup other than the Stimwave coupling system is integrated into the lead whereas the Nalu system requires you have to option to attach it.

Calling it an "Implantable Pulse Generator" does not make it so.

Table 2, page 10 of the PDF for Nalu's comparison

If the patient comes back after implant and needs another disc can you bill for another IPG?
 

You can't argue with this?



 
You can't argue with this?



Paid advertisements.
 
Members don't see this ad :)
did you really post 3 articles all by the same physician?



what does your other thought leader Centeno think about stimwave? your past posts suggest that he wont defend SIJ fusion...
 
drusso has officially jumped the shark, like this old avatar. he was teetering for a while, but he is officially there now.
 
  • Hmm
Reactions: 1 user
did you really post 3 articles all by the same physician?



what does your other thought leader Centeno think about stimwave? your past posts suggest that he wont defend SIJ fusion...

1618940929231.png
 
drusso has officially jumped the shark, like this old avatar. he was teetering for a while, but he is officially there now.
Game changer...

 
The cost of the Stimwave implant appears to be inflated in proportion to what they thought they could milk out of insurance TBH. I don't see why it should even cost $10,000.

3. Performing this procedure results in a net loss; the cost of the implant is $10,000 more than the total reimbursement
 
The cost of the Stimwave implant appears to be inflated in proportion to what they thought they could milk out of insurance TBH. I don't see why it should even cost $10,000.

3. Performing this procedure results in a net loss; the cost of the implant is $10,000 more than the total reimbursement
1619486359095.png
 
WTF is functional instability of the lumbar spine? seems like a crock of sh$t.

Functional instability sounds like a great way to describe some of my patients...
 
There's a lot of snake oil out there to try, but at the end of the day, it's what we've got to work with from an evidence-based management perspective when patients have failed the less invasive therapies. I'd rather do PNS all day than send some of these folks for their 3 or 4th surgery for a pain complaint.
 
WTF is functional instability of the lumbar spine? seems like a crock of sh$t.
It’s the reason to inject everything in the “functional spinal unit” w stem cells..... I watched some of those procedure videos. It felt like I was watching a Frank’s red hot commercial.... “ I put that $hit on everything!”
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: 4 users
Not sure where the hate comes from. I think the PNS devices work. We act like most of the SCS studies are not backed by industry.

not sure why we are poo pooing the sprint study published in anesthesiology, seems like a good motor sparing perioperative pain control strategy, would not be surprised if sprint focused on selling their unit as a peri operative device and lowered the cost.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Not sure where the hate comes from. I think the PNS devices work. We act like most of the SCS studies are not backed by industry.

not sure why we are poo pooing the sprint study published in anesthesiology, seems like a good motor sparing perioperative pain control strategy, would not be surprised if sprint focused on selling their unit as a peri operative device and lowered the cost.
 
Not sure where the hate comes from. I think the PNS devices work. We act like most of the SCS studies are not backed by industry.

not sure why we are poo pooing the sprint study published in anesthesiology, seems like a good motor sparing perioperative pain control strategy, would not be surprised if sprint focused on selling their unit as a peri operative device and lowered the cost.
there is a marked difference between perioperative use and long term use, as there is a marked difference between acute and chronic pain. different mechanisms, different effects.
1. salesman
2. how much botox has he had?
 
Internal tens for profit.

You're thinking of the Reactiv-8 product. This is percutaneous TENS.

there is a marked difference between perioperative use and long term use, as there is a marked difference between acute and chronic pain. different mechanisms, different effects.

1. salesman
2. how much botox has he had?
Although he is very commercialized, I don't fault him for doing it well.

I would argue though that the acute and chronic mechanisms have a significant degree of overlap mechanistically, with most preclinical work suggesting blocking acute changes can help reduce the magnitude of chronic changes. I'd rather see things going this way, from chronic treatment to acute, as compared to opioids where they went from an acute therapy and used it in the chronic setting. With that said, I think their data are stronger for the chronic therapy than an acute device, especially as they have a definite non-responder rate.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Top