URM? Any Insights from adcoms or interviewers?

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.
The idea that white kids with good stats are being hurt by this policy is ridiculous.

I think it's more or being told "racism is bad and you shouldn't be racist" your whole life then all of the sudden being told "No, racism is good now for medical admissions and it's ok to accept one student over another based solely on the color of their skin" (again, the boost seems to be about 10 MCAT points from Asian to African American, which is huge).

It kind of messes with your world view. So now you're thinking "Wait... so now society is telling me racism is ok, when you believe the ends justify the means? What? Can't people use that logic to justify just about any sort of racism?" The answer is of course yes.
 
1395695239462.jpg


(apologies to Randall)

http://forums.studentdoctor.net/thr...e-who-applied-with-your-cgpa-and-mcat.888650/

Without cherry picking, you'll see to have the same odds of acceptance the average Asian needs about 10 MCAT points higher than the average African American.

You can argue "But wait, maybe the African American had more difficulties to overcome, on average" (which I think is likely true), but I would also say it's safe to assume someone with a 3.5/35 probably had more extra curricular activities (on average) than someone with a 3.5/25 (in general, people with fantastic stats also work hard on research and extra curricular activities as seen in the "what are my chances?" threads). Obviously we won't know exactly how big the boost is, but the data indicates it's about 10 points from Asian to African American and gets smaller for other groups.
 
Racism is bad. This isn't racism. You're presumably a med student, or a premed. You really owe it to yourself to have a more educated, nuanced worldview when it comes to race, race relations, diversity, and URMs. If you're still in school, you might want to take a course offered by your university. If not, there are a number of books that will greatly enhance your understanding of the issues.
 
I think it's more or being told "racism is bad and you shouldn't be racist" your whole life then all of the sudden being told "No, racism is good now for medical admissions and it's ok to accept one student over another based solely on the color of their skin" (again, the boost seems to be about 10 MCAT points from Asian to African American, which is huge).

It kind of messes with your world view. So now you're thinking "Wait... so now society is telling me racism is ok, when you believe the ends justify the means? What? Can't people use that logic to justify just about any sort of racism?" The answer is of course yes.

But were you not taught that racism exists? I certainly was, and witnessed it. Just like you got a boost in your life from your privilege (whether you recognize it or not), giving someone a boost on their application because their achievements are put into context is perfectly fair.
 
http://forums.studentdoctor.net/thr...e-who-applied-with-your-cgpa-and-mcat.888650/

Without cherry picking, you'll see to have the same odds of acceptance the average Asian needs about 10 MCAT points higher than the average African American.

You can argue "But wait, maybe the African American had more difficulties to overcome, on average" (which I think is likely true), but I would also say it's safe to assume someone with a 3.5/35 probably had more extra curricular activities (on average) than someone with a 3.5/25 (in general, people with fantastic stats also work hard on research and extra curricular activities as seen in the "what are my chances?" threads). Obviously we won't know exactly how big the boost is, but the data indicates it's about 10 points from Asian to African American and gets smaller for other groups.

Those numbers are potentially extremely misleading. They completely discount any other factors besides GPA and MCAT.
 
Racism is bad. This isn't racism. You're presumably a med student, or a premed. You really owe it to yourself to have a more educated, nuanced worldview when it comes to race, race relations, diversity, and URMs. If you're still in school, you might want to take a course offered by your university. If not, there are a number of books that will greatly enhance your understanding of the issues.

Racism: racial prejudice or discrimination ( http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/racism )

Discrimination: treatment or consideration of, or making a distinction in favor of or against, a person or thing basedon the group, class, or category to which that person or thing belongs rather than on individual merit:racial and religious intolerance and discrimination. ( http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/discrimination )

Honestly, if you don't see how selecting against Asian Americans for "diversity" (in any academic setting, not just medicine) is racist then you literally aren't understanding the definition of the words. Accepting one student over another based on their race is racist (seriously, how is this even open for debate?).
 
Those numbers are potentially extremely misleading. They completely discount any other factors besides GPA and MCAT.

Right. And I personally would not be surprised if the boost is actually bigger than 10 MCAT points (I somewhat doubt an Asian with a 3.5 GPA and 35 MCAT has worse extra curricular activities, on average, than an African American with a 3.5 GPA and 25 MCAT and think it's pretty unreasonable to assume otherwise, but meh).
 
The idea that white kids with good stats are being hurt by this policy is ridiculous.

This is really what kills me too. Like these kids think they're entitled to a seat in med school and the URMs are taking it away.

Newsflash y'all, NO ONE is entitled to a med school seat. Not even the URMs you like to flame so much.
 
But were you not taught that racism exists? I certainly was, and witnessed it. Just like you got a boost in your life from your privilege (whether you recognize it or not), giving someone a boost on their application because their achievements are put into context is perfectly fair.

I've been taught many things exist and are wrong. Rape exists, but it's wrong. Murder exists, but it's wrong. The list goes on and on. Teaching me something exists has nothing to do with what my previous posts say, I've of course seen and experienced racism as we all have (of different magnitudes).

I've yet to meet a single person who doesn't agree with giving people some sort of boost by taking socioeconomic conditions into account. The problem is giving someone a boost based on race and not socioeconomic conditions. That is racist.
 
From your link, definition 1:

"a belief that race is the primary determinant of human traits and capacities and that racial differences produce an inherent superiority of a particular race"

Well this certainly is not that.

Definition 2:

"racial prejudice or discrimination"

Well this certainly isn't prejudice. Is it discrimination by this definition? The primary meaning of discrimination used by that dictionary is:

"the practice of unfairly treating a person or group of people differently from other people or groups of people"

So, no. While the practice in question is technically discrimination by the primary dictionary definition, it is clearly not racism.

We can argue semantics all day, but the practice of increasing URM representation in medicine through medical school admissions is not racism.
 
Racism: racial prejudice or discrimination ( http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/racism )

Discrimination: treatment or consideration of, or making a distinction in favor of or against, a person or thing basedon the group, class, or category to which that person or thing belongs rather than on individual merit:racial and religious intolerance and discrimination. ( http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/discrimination )

Honestly, if you don't see how selecting against Asian Americans for "diversity" (in any academic setting, not just medicine) is racist then you literally aren't understanding the definition of the words. Accepting one student over another based on their race is racist (seriously, how is this even open for debate?).

If you read the first 6 pages of the thread, we are all agreeing that it is racial discrimination. Just like it is regional discrimination to take people only from massachusetts even though you went to college there, or lingual discrimination to take only fluent spanish speakers in the PR. That doesn't make it a negative thing, just a school policy thing (with the goal of providing the best care to the most people).
 
StBernardsRule, I looked at your posting history. I can understand where your frustration is coming from. Getting into a medical school is hard. But you appear to be blaming a nonexistent bogeyman.

URMs are not the reason you haven't been accepted into a program yet.
 
StBernardsRule, I looked at your posting history. I can understand where your frustration is coming from. Getting into a medical school is hard. But you appear to be blaming a nonexistent bogeyman.

URMs are not the reason you haven't been accepted into a program yet.

Since we're already apparently going for personal attacks rather than a discussion, I'll see my way out.
 
Though I've already made my point in a very long post previously, I am curious on one thing. Does anyone realize that those same URM med students who may have lower stats than the higher stats of ORM med students possibly also took those spots from URM med students who have higher stats on par or even higher than the ORM med student applicant pool? And that ORM med students who have lower stats than most may have taken spots from ORM and URM med applicants who have higher stats? Because it seems that the focus is just on how URM students with low stats get in compared to ORM students with higher stats, when in huge reality, it's more than just that.

This reminds me of how people were hating on the high school black boy who got into all the Ivy League schools, saying it's solely based on his race. The same argument applies there. He beat out candidates who weren't only ORM but also URM who quite possibly could've had amazing, stellar stats that pale in comparison to his. But every time it only focuses on ORM students with higher stats, not on URM students who might also have higher stats as well, who might've had more compelling stories and experiences to give.

Finally, I also love that no one ever talks about the kids who have legacies, the ones who donate huge tons of money to the institution to get in, or have a reputation/name/parents that are doctors or have some prestige in another field. They beat out the kids to not only colleges, but law schools, business schools, top notch high/middle schools, basically any institution that wants to give them that boost. I'm not saying they don't deserve to be in there either, for some of them have worked their asses off to be in those schools. But you also can't deny that such a background gives them an edge.

So the policy sucks, but you need to realize that it sucks for everyone. For if med schools were giving kickbacks to URMs regardless of their stats, there will be a lot more URMS in med schools than there are now at many mid-tier/top-tier schools, because I highly doubt that the number of URMs who apply to med school is a small amount. It's the whole package.
 
Since we're already apparently going for personal attacks rather than a discussion, I'll see my way out.

This is why it's important to take into account the experiences that a person has had when considering an argument, application, etc. I'm not trying to make a personal attack or be mean.
 
StBernardsRule, I looked at your posting history. I can understand where your frustration is coming from. Getting into a medical school is hard. But you appear to be blaming a nonexistent bogeyman.

URMs are not the reason you haven't been accepted into a program yet.

Don't be naive... Not everyone win in poker. One person's acceptance is other person's rejection. Even though it is highly unlikely, URM policy can be the reason
 
Though I've already made my point in a very long post previously, I am curious on one thing. Does anyone realize that those same URM med students who may have lower stats than the higher stats of ORM med students possibly also took those spots from URM med students who have higher stats on par or even higher than the ORM med student applicant pool? And that ORM med students who have lower stats than most may have taken spots from ORM and URM med applicants who have higher stats? Because it seems that the focus is just on how URM students with low stats get in compared to ORM students with higher stats, when in huge reality, it's more than just that.

This reminds me of how people were hating on the high school black boy who got into all the Ivy League schools, saying it's solely based on his race. The same argument applies there. He beat out candidates who weren't only ORM but also URM who quite possibly could've had amazing, stellar stats that pale in comparison to his. But every time it only focuses on ORM students with higher stats, not on URM students who might also have higher stats as well, who might've had more compelling stories and experiences to give.

Finally, I also love that no one ever talks about the kids who have legacies, the ones who donate huge tons of money to the institution to get in, or have a reputation/name/parents that are doctors or have some prestige in another field. They beat out the kids to not only colleges, but law schools, business schools, top notch high/middle schools, basically any institution that wants to give them that boost. I'm not saying they don't deserve to be in there either, for some of them have worked their asses off to be in those schools. But you also can't deny that such a background gives them an edge.

So the policy sucks, but you need to realize that it sucks for everyone. For if med schools were giving kickbacks to URMs regardless of their stats, there will be a lot more URMS in med schools than there are now at many mid-tier/top-tier schools, because I highly doubt that the number of URMs who apply to med school is a small amount. It's the whole package.



We don't talk about legacy because no one try to sugarcoat it. I strongly agree with you that it's the whole package. However, systematic automatic boost to URM is a plain racism. Now, if society wants, or you wants racism to end racism, nothing left to be argued.
 
Don't be naive... Not everyone win in poker. One person's acceptance is other person's rejection. Even though it is highly unlikely, URM policy can be the reason
Or it could be the legacy they let in because their daddy is on the board.

Or it could be the money the family donated to the school.

Or it could be preference given to in state students.

Or it could be that the person doesn't interview well.

Or it could be that they were seeking more non traditional students.

Or it could be that the school didn't feel the person was a great fit for the program.

Or it could be that everyone accepted to the class had a more compelling story and more well rounded application.

For the millionth time, good GPA and MCAT score doesn't mean anyone is MORE deserving of a spot at a medical school. A seat is not a prize for the highest score/GPA combo. A student with lower stats is not any "less" than one with higher stats in any way. The sooner you get that through your head, the better off you'll be.

There are any number of reasons why a person would not be accepted into a medical school class. Your fixation on blaming race and URMs is nothing more than thinly veiled racism.
 
This is why it's important to take into account the experiences that a person has had when considering an argument, application, etc. I'm not trying to make a personal attack or be mean.

Yes. You personally judged his qualification as an applicant and used in your argument.
 
My last post in the thread (don't plan to be the guy who says he'll stop posting then keeps posting).

This is why it's important to take into account the experiences that a person has had when considering an argument, application, etc. I'm not trying to make a personal attack or be mean.

Your original post looking into my personal history was wrong on several accounts. Now I have to either explain to you why you're wrong (which takes away from the discussion at hand, since my personal history has nothing to do with it) or I can choose to allow you continue to take false "experiences that I've had when considering my argument."

It's also pretty obvious that it was a passive aggressive personal attack. I have several friends who agree with affirmative action (even though I don't), but I would never make a comment like "Well, of course you agree with affirmative action... you got into medical school with a 24 MCAT!" It's mean, it detracts from the discussion, and it makes an unfair assumption that he or she only agrees with a policy because he or she benefited from it. And if I did make a comment like that, I'd at least own what I was doing rather than pretend I didn't make a personal attack.
 
Or it could be the legacy they let in because their daddy is on the board.

Or it could be the money the family donated to the school.

Or it could be preference given to in state students.

Or it could be that the person doesn't interview well.

Or it could be that they were seeking more non traditional students.

Or it could be that the school didn't feel the person was a great fit for the program.

Or it could be that everyone accepted to the class had a more compelling story and more well rounded application.

For the millionth time, good GPA and MCAT score doesn't mean anyone is MORE deserving of a spot at a medical school. A seat is not a prize for the highest score/GPA combo. A student with lower stats is not any "less" than one with higher stats in any way. The sooner you get that through your head, the better off you'll be.

There are any number of reasons why a person would not be accepted into a medical school class. Your fixation on blaming race and URMs is nothing more than thinly veiled racism.


Your argument is invalid because i did say 'highly unlikely'. Other things matter way more than URM status
 
Yes. You personally judged his qualification as an applicant and used in your argument.

I didn't judge his qualifications. I don't know what his qualifications are. The medical schools to which he applied judged them, and now he's asking about podiatry programs, indicating that he didn't get in last cycle.

And now he's all but blaming URMs.
 
Tell me how you were abused. Also, tell me how others, who were not involved in your ancestor's abuse, should provide you with reparations. Stop acting like you were the victim in events that happened in the past.


The path to equality is paved with forgiveness and accepting new beginnings. Looking in the past and demanding things only exacerbates the animosity between races.





Do I have to be a minority to understand their plight and sympathize with them? If anything, my personal experience having minority friends and roommates and my clinical experience, working with patients in underserved areas has really opened my eyes to a lot of things. Tell me, do you have to be directly affected by something tragic to become fearful? The Tuskegee incident was not an isolated incident. Things like that have happened numerous times throughout our history, some not that long ago. So, for you it may be a thing in the past for others it’s just another reason to fear going to the doctor. When you consider this and add the fact that the US Public Health service has, on occasion, failed to act on certain diseases since they only affected poor minority populations you get the outcome we have now. A system in medicine where minorities don’t feel they matter or receive quality care. A system they feel will use them or their children as guinea pigs without their consent just because they are minorities (research the CDC incident 1990 in LA). This is not really about slavery and segregation, although those events do play a role in why certain things are in our country. Whether you like it or not, our history is dark and we have done some awful things to minority populations to betray their trust. There is no sweeping it under the rug. The path to equality is paved with forgiveness but forgiving doesn’t necessarily mean forgetting. It’s almost human nature to be apprehensive when someone does something to lose your trust, particularity when it happens again and again. So how about you forgive those who are still a little reluctant to trust again, especially with something as important as their life.
 
Okay, so you and @MangoPlant think better education will help fix things. I could get behind that but what about the minority students who have already graduated out of high school and college and won’t get to benefit from new programs? Where does that leave them?

I like how people wave their hands in the air and say things like "educate them better!"
 
Okay, so you and @MangoPlant think better education will help fix things. I could get behind that but what about the minority students who have already graduated out of high school and college and won’t get to benefit from new programs? Where does that leave them?

It leaves them going back to school to retake classes just like everyone else who grew up in a bad school system or squandered their younger years. When you do it long enough to get your grades/mcat in range, you apply and wish for the best. Lots of people do it, I was never the only person >30yrs old in my night school community college classes or taking labs on the weekends.
 
It leaves them going back to school to retake classes just like everyone else who grew up in a bad school system or squandered their younger years. When you do it long enough to get your grades/mcat in range, you apply and wish for the best. Lots of people do it, I was never the only person >30yrs old in my night school community college classes or taking labs on the weekends.
These efforts are already the case for a lot of applicants. A URM with a slow start (i.e. a 3.0 gpa) may finish with a 3.4 - 3.5 after taking additional upper level courses and/or a post bacc, but in the end, they've demonstrated a significant upward trend. Although, ultimately, this applicant's gpa is still "below average." I've seen others choose 2 years of research instead (which doesn't factor into the gpa). This demonstrates that focusing primarily on numbers can be misleading because the numerical stats don't tell the entire story.
And as you mentioned, these scenarios also apply to ORM's. And I sincerely hope that ORM's that demonstrate this effort get their fair chance as well.
 
Last edited:
Ok so you're in favor of hurting people now for something that they had no control over to make up for something that didn't actually hurt you.

Really? You get that the system is not perfect? Why are you so eager to adopt it, then?

You guys supporting this are (for the most part) able to (god forbid!!) accept that this system is not perfect, thank god. Realize though that you are settling for mediocrity rather than striving to produce a better system. When people settle, changes don't occur, and if they do, it happens at a slower pace.

Let me explain further. The things that happened to African-Americans in the 60's and 70's (and everything earlier!) still affect black people today. How does it affect me personally? HAHA let's see... My family started at rock bottom to build an economic foundation. Therefore there is little money to be spent on tutors, after school programs, etc. My parents also wanted to help their own parents to get out of poverty so some money was used for their healthcare and necessary expenses. My parents used every resource they had to afford to put me in the best schools in the area. Yes, we could have stayed in a poorer area with worse schools and less money for student resources, but we didn't. Living in this area, my two brothers have been pulled over and drug searched WITH DOGS in plain sight a few times each. Neither has ever smoked nor drank underage. Have you ever experienced ANYTHING as demoralizing as that?? It doesn't phase them anymore. I was 7 when this first happened while I was in the car with my brother. When we go to the mall, we are followed so intently, we usually get what we came for and leave, unless we go to a mall in a different area where there are more black people like us. If you think events from the past don't affect racism today, you are so out of touch that I don't think you could ever relate to a black patient. It's amazing how people don't understand this history.

My high school recruited students who they thought would do well on the SAT to take a free prep class. I wasn't chosen. (Still to this day don't know why I wasn't selected though I was in the top 5 GPA's in my class and was nearly National Merit Scholar.) I scored a 2280 on my SAT with only free test prep I could find online. I don't mean to brag, but I just wanted you to see obstacles black students overcome just to be the best they can.

When I said the system is not perfect, I was mainly referring to the number of recent African immigrants who seem to benefit from affirmative action. I just didn't want to call them out because I didn't want to start anything. I see affirmative action as a reparation as well as a health policy initiative. I honestly do not care if a few white students with stats below average get replaced by a few black students with stats below average. Black people have had everything taken away from them by the government and society, financially and culturally. As a people, we've only been on equal ground for 40 years. For the majority of black people in America, everything we've gained is a product of 40 years of work. Other cultures have legacies that go back to the beginning of time. If a white person from Appalachia is poor, it's usually not the result of the government and society intentionally forcing them to be poor. Affirmative action tries to ameliorate that wrong by giving us preferential treatment in one tiny area of life (despite everything else).

But hey, let's say we reform the system so that only the top scores get accepted. How many would go to underserved communities and work? Sure, we could pay them more, because we all know that extrinsic motivation is way more effective than intrinsic motivation *sarcasm*.

There is so much more I could say but it's not even worth explaining it all to you because you will still try to deny it. Point blank, I don't care if you think it's discriminatory. This isn't about you, it's about a reparation to a group of students who are the sons and daughters of people who were dislocated and robbed of EVERYTHING who will in turn go back and help others that same group because they actually care. You aren't entitled to a spot. I'm not either. But if we have the same test scores but I will better help a national health crisis, the answer is pretty simple to me about who should get in.

I literally laugh out loud when people complain that they are being "hurt" by not getting a spot in medical school when they have low, unimpressive test scores. The URM with a 29 MCAT and 3.4 isn't taking away the spot of someone with a 36 and 3.9 and amazing EC's.

Didn't get into a medical school vs. Descendant of enslaved people and discriminated against throughout life. I think we know who is actually "hurting".
 
We don't talk about legacy because no one try to sugarcoat it. I strongly agree with you that it's the whole package. However, systematic automatic boost to URM is a plain racism. Now, if society wants, or you wants racism to end racism, nothing left to be argued.

@LMBLBM : I don't want racism to end racism. My first post detailed that in order for everything to be on a level playing field, we have to have a better public educational system. Period. Because to be honest, I could not look at any kid in the eye, whether he/she/ze was black, white, Latino/Hispanic, Asian, Native American, and any other ethnicity/race and/or gender/sexuality and tell them that the US educational system will not discriminate against them, will not judge them, will not put them down due to the factors that should not affect their education. That would be an outright lie. It is the same as it was in the past, and it is now. All I'm saying is that the system can screw a person over if you don't have everything in the right place in your life. Life isn't meant to be a straight road, but the educational system should be one of the few places in our country that no one should worry about being a certain economic status, being a certain race and ethnicity, fitting into a social status. All that should matter is the work ethic you bring in, the desire to learn, and that your faculty and administration are behind you 100% to succeed. I want our educational system not only be race-blind, but be blind to whatever gender/sexuality you are, the economic status you're in, the cultural/religious background you have (as long as those said beliefs will not lead you to harm another person and/or yourself). But that's simply not the case at all, because society doesn't want to take that time to do it.

And I said previously that not only ORMs don't like Affirmative Action and boosts, but also URMs because they are then put on the spot to defend themselves, to defend why they are at the school they're at. It's unfair to have people doubt that you made it because you're a certain race/ethnicity; for maybe you didn't even want that boost to begin with, and yet it's there, whether you like it or not. A bunch of Harvard black students did a project on this, after having an article come out about AA at Harvard that did not really make them feel too welcomed.

We are the generation that can make a difference, but please look around at where we're at. Yes, we have a black president, but look at all the hate he still gets. Yes women are allowed in the military, but look at how much rape/sexual assault they are to experience based on studies and reports; heck, just even look at how women in power are treated. Even men who've experienced assault/rape, it's difficult for our society to think that is possible, particularly if the man is no longer a young boy/teenager, but a grown-up man. Look at how Asians are still treated as gunners, taking our top spots and jobs; even white people who are seen to be from the "backroads" of the South, Appalachia, Midwest, that they're crazy, stuck in the past, no point in educating them. Those with mental illnesses, disorders, and other ailments of the brain, seen as violent and weird. And what about LGBQTIA issues as well, where they've been cases of people killing those who've identified as trans, bisexual. We are at the time where that can change, but there is so much work to be done. Are you willing to be the forefront of that along with others? I am, but it's mad tough, because you then realize there are people out there, the ones that need to care that simply don't care. The ones that need to see the solution, that need to see the work that needs to be done, they don't care, or rather just ignore it, or too afraid to make the change. And that scares me, because then how are we as a society going to move forward if there is no concerted effort to make the change?

I want to hug it out like @sb247 said. Because it's not on the URM, or the ORM for that matter. It's the institution, the government, whomever has the power to stop the policy. You can ask the URMs to protest against it and have it shut down, and/or have ORMs do it too, like they've done in a couple of states for state education. But then what? I want the next step. Other people want the next step beyond that. What can we do to make sure that when admissions for med school, or any type of school for that matter, are choosing the class, that they have the 100% confidence that every single one of those students had a fair chance in education, that they had mostly all equal opportunities offered to them if they were to pursue public school education? That not one of those kids had to shoulder any extra burdens to make it there that aren't outlined in personal statements, in the interviews, or other avenues that can be openly expressed?

These conversations make me wonder if Affirmative Action, or any type of boosts, is just hurting the cause many people sacrificed their lives for during the Civil Rights Movement, during those times of enduring slavery, indentured servitude, poor job conditions, of wanting there to be no longer any detriment to getting education, a job, care, support. Not only the movement from blacks and other minorities, but from the Irish, Catholics, Asians, Jews, all those who've been discriminated in one way or form in this country's and/or other countries' histories. All of those groups simply just wanted a fair shot just like the majority. Just wanted to make it, regardless if they were of a certain race, ethnicity, background, gender/sexuality.
 
Tell me, do you have to be directly affected by something tragic to become fearful?

Of course not. But there's a difference between being afraid of being eaten by a shark and catching the plague when someone sneezes.

So, for you it may be a thing in the past for others it’s just another reason to fear going to the doctor.

Well I think it's an unfounded fear. Like I said, it's not happening in today's society so why fear it?

The path to equality is paved with forgiveness but forgiving doesn’t necessarily mean forgetting. It’s almost human nature to be apprehensive when someone does something to lose your trust, particularity when it happens again and again.

True forgiveness IS forgetting dude. Explain to me again how someone has done something to YOU, other than tell you horror stories of the past, that made you think twice about trusting a doctor.

So how about you forgive those who are still a little reluctant to trust again, especially with something as important as their life.

What? I have a problem with the system not the individual.

I like how people wave their hands in the air and say things like "educate them better!"

A LOT of these problems can be solved with better education. Have you seen how awful our education system is compared to some other developed countries? We have lots of room for improvement and I think this is our most practical method of solving these issues. But yeah keep scoffing at our ideas to improve things and continue accepting mediocrity.

So you are so closed off to what is going on around you that you didn't know what 'LGBT' meant the other day, but you are positive you are 100% knowledgeable about the racial situation in this country. OK.

Or maybe I was being extremely sarcastic and managed to FOOL ALL OF YOU *evil laugh*. Who knows though, right?!?! 😉 Reckoner would appreciate this.

You're comparing Tuskegee with ppl that may or may not have lower #'s for med school??

I'm comparing the principle of utilitarian ethics that you so casually seem to support when it favors you.

So it's not OK to adopt this philosophy when it physically harms someone but when you're just casually throwing away someones dreams and aspirations it's alright? Tell me, where do you draw the line?

Sacrificing the individual to better society is a slippery slope.

And sure, make a "supplemental NBA draft."

No, actually it would be allowing white people boosts because of the CHANCE that they MIGHT make their team better. Like saying they are going to improve the team because they'd appeal to the white population and increase the TV ratings and ticket purchases to games. Make sure we add some LGBT in there, we want trans people watching basketball too.
____________
Look, the problem is, this system is catering to the needs of a generation that is either dead or going to be dead soon. Our generation has NO PRESENT REASON to doubt the motives of our physicians. If this policy was in place a long time ago, it would make more sense.
 
Let me explain further. The things that happened to African-Americans in the 60's and 70's (and everything earlier!) still affect black people today. How does it affect me personally? HAHA let's see... My family started at rock bottom to build an economic foundation. Therefore there is little money to be spent on tutors, after school programs, etc. My parents also wanted to help their own parents to get out of poverty so some money was used for their healthcare and necessary expenses. My parents used every resource they had to afford to put me in the best schools in the area. Yes, we could have stayed in a poorer area with worse schools and less money for student resources, but we didn't. Living in this area, my two brothers have been pulled over and drug searched WITH DOGS in plain sight a few times each. Neither has ever smoked nor drank underage. Have you ever experienced ANYTHING as demoralizing as that?? It doesn't phase them anymore. I was 7 when this first happened while I was in the car with my brother. When we go to the mall, we are followed so intently, we usually get what we came for and leave, unless we go to a mall in a different area where there are more black people like us. If you think events from the past don't affect racism today, you are so out of touch that I don't think you could ever relate to a black patient. It's amazing how people don't understand this history.

My high school recruited students who they thought would do well on the SAT to take a free prep class. I wasn't chosen. (Still to this day don't know why I wasn't selected though I was in the top 5 GPA's in my class and was nearly National Merit Scholar.) I scored a 2280 on my SAT with only free test prep I could find online. I don't mean to brag, but I just wanted you to see obstacles black students overcome just to be the best they can.

When I said the system is not perfect, I was mainly referring to the number of recent African immigrants who seem to benefit from affirmative action. I just didn't want to call them out because I didn't want to start anything. I see affirmative action as a reparation as well as a health policy initiative. I honestly do not care if a few white students with stats below average get replaced by a few black students with stats below average. Black people have had everything taken away from them by the government and society, financially and culturally. As a people, we've only been on equal ground for 40 years. For the majority of black people in America, everything we've gained is a product of 40 years of work. Other cultures have legacies that go back to the beginning of time. If a white person from Appalachia is poor, it's usually not the result of the government and society intentionally forcing them to be poor. Affirmative action tries to ameliorate that wrong by giving us preferential treatment in one tiny area of life (despite everything else).

But hey, let's say we reform the system so that only the top scores get accepted. How many would go to underserved communities and work? Sure, we could pay them more, because we all know that extrinsic motivation is way more effective than intrinsic motivation *sarcasm*.

There is so much more I could say but it's not even worth explaining it all to you because you will still try to deny it. Point blank, I don't care if you think it's discriminatory. This isn't about you, it's about a reparation to a group of students who are the sons and daughters of people who were dislocated and robbed of EVERYTHING who will in turn go back and help others that same group because they actually care. You aren't entitled to a spot. I'm not either. But if we have the same test scores but I will better help a national health crisis, the answer is pretty simple to me about who should get in.

I literally laugh out loud when people complain that they are being "hurt" by not getting a spot in medical school when they have low, unimpressive test scores. The URM with a 29 MCAT and 3.4 isn't taking away the spot of someone with a 36 and 3.9 and amazing EC's.

Didn't get into a medical school vs. Descendant of enslaved people and discriminated against throughout life. I think we know who is actually "hurting".


I like your story, and I truly hope that you can use your unique background to help your future patients. And I finally found a logical and honest answer.
"We have been suffered, we need reverse discrimination, and I don't care".
 
A LOT of these problems can be solved with better education. Have you seen how awful our education system is compared to some other developed countries? We have lots of room for improvement and I think this is our most practical method of solving these issues. But yeah keep scoffing at our ideas to improve things and continue accepting mediocrity.

The problem is that "better education" is both not a cure-all and incredibly difficult to implement.

And it's something that a lot of people are trying very very hard to actually bring about! It's not like adcoms have just concluded that lowering the bar a little for URMs is simply "the answer" and primary education is being ignored.
 
Nice soap box @Womb Raider ... But you still didn't give any real and practical solutions to the questions I posed, so not sure why you quoted me to begin with.

And to bring up gender equality.. You know the same thing had to be done to attain the almost balanced gender classes you see today right? Policies had to be made to let in women in work forces, business, universities, and other parts of society where they were determined to be less worthy of their male counterparts for arbitrary reasons. I'm sure there were great protests by men that this was horrible, women wouldn't learn by forcing employers to take them, reverse sexism and whatever else you can come up with. They weren't "qualified" enough right? Now we see medical school and other historically patriarchal fields with women in positions of power because of similar policies. Initially the educated women available, read: applicant pool, for these positions of power and universities were the minority. Schools had to make the conscious decisions to include women over their male counterparts who far outnumbered them. They could fill vacancies solely with available males. But they didn't, they had to give preference to females to break the male domination. Female patients wanted the option to see female doctors, for the same reasons of trust, understanding and comfort.

Do you see that as immoral? It's the same thing. But I guess the promotion of minorities is a new level of immorality.
 
Those numbers are potentially extremely misleading. They completely discount any other factors besides GPA and MCAT.

Who cares? The only point that was brought up was a ~10 point mcat boost - no more, no less. Seeing how the difference in avg mcat between asians and african americans is 5.7 and a GPA of 0.33, 10 points is a reasonable estimate. He is right. "Small boost" my ass. He never claims that's the ONLY difference between URM and ORM applicants but the fact remains that this ridiculous boost of almost 10 mcat points exists.

Source: Table 19 in AAMC
 
Of course not. But there's a difference between being afraid of being eaten by a shark and catching the plague when someone sneezes.



Well I think it's an unfounded fear. Like I said, it's not happening in today's society so why fear it?



True forgiveness IS forgetting dude. Explain to me again how someone has done something to YOU, other than tell you horror stories of the past, that made you think twice about trusting a doctor.



What? I have a problem with the system not the individual.



A LOT of these problems can be solved with better education. Have you seen how awful our education system is compared to some other developed countries? We have lots of room for improvement and I think this is our most practical method of solving these issues. But yeah keep scoffing at our ideas to improve things and continue accepting mediocrity.



Or maybe I was being extremely sarcastic and managed to FOOL ALL OF YOU *evil laugh*. Who knows though, right?!?! 😉 Reckoner would appreciate this.



I'm comparing the principle of utilitarian ethics that you so casually seem to support when it favors you.

So it's not OK to adopt this philosophy when it physically harms someone but when you're just casually throwing away someones dreams and aspirations it's alright? Tell me, where do you draw the line?

Sacrificing the individual to better society is a slippery slope.



No, actually it would be allowing white people boosts because of the CHANCE that they MIGHT make their team better. Like saying they are going to improve the team because they'd appeal to the white population and increase the TV ratings and ticket purchases to games. Make sure we add some LGBT in there, we want trans people watching basketball too.
____________
Look, the problem is, this system is catering to the needs of a generation that is either dead or going to be dead soon. Our generation has NO PRESENT REASON to doubt the motives of our physicians. If this policy was in place a long time ago, it would make more sense.

I am terrible at quoting, forgive me. But what you said at the end, I took a medical anthropology course some years back, and one of the pieces (I'll try to find it for you if you want) was on how people who are of different cultural backgrounds might be unwilling to go to the doctor, or tell the doctor their entire history. It was interesting, because it didn't focus on people of the past, but of young children and teenagers of today who should be more open, but due to what their parents, relatives, culture might've experienced, they might have that doubt still to reach out. It surprised our class, because you should be giving the necessary information to your doctor, trusting your doctor to give you proper care, particularly in this day and age. And then we read some other articles/pieces of literature that further explained this point on why that might not be the case. Again, if you want sources, I'll try to dig them up from my boxes and/or look them up online. But though the fear might not be universal, it can and does exist. It's not right, particularly now that we're pushing for everyone to have health care, so we either need to boost the confidence of these groups to trust doctors more, and/or have doctors be trained to know that these fears/doubts might still exist.
 
Who cares? The only point that was brought up was a ~10 point mcat boost - no more, no less. Seeing how the difference in avg mcat between asians and african americans is 5.7 and a GPA of 0.33, 10 points is a reasonable estimate. He is right. "Small boost" my ass. He never claims that's the ONLY difference between URM and ORM applicants but the fact remains that this ridiculous boost of almost 10 mcat points exists.

Data interpretation fail.

You're assuming that ECs, personal statements, etc., are essentially equivalent between the white applicants and black applicants. That's the only way to draw any conclusions about how much of a "boost" the URMs get using that data.
 
Data interpretation fail.

You're assuming that ECs, personal statements, etc., are essentially equivalent between the white applicants and black applicants. That's the only way to draw any conclusions about how much of a "boost" the URMs get using that data.

Nope, YOU fail. We say there is a 10 point boost. That is it. Stop pulling bullsh*t out of thin air. Please quote where we make those assumptions.
 
Of course not. But there's a difference between being afraid of being eaten by a shark and catching the plague when someone sneezes.



Well I think it's an unfounded fear. Like I said, it's not happening in today's society so why fear it?
Those victims didn't know what happened until years later so who's to say it's still not happening now and it just hasn't been uncovered? Sounds like paranoia but after talking to several patients this seems like a real possibility to them. The incident with the CDC happened 24 years ago with 1500 black and Hispanic babies. If that was your child how would you feel, knowing our country's history with that type of thing? If you lived in that area would you be reluctant to take your child to the doctor? I think many of us already do some form of this this in our own way. When we hear certain stories about particular hospitals in our area, many of us are reluctant to get treated and operated on there. Perhaps you don't care...

The truth is, it's not unfounded fear, you think so and that's fine but others do not especially those who have lived through those events. We'll agree to disagree.
 
Okay, so you and @MangoPlant think better education will help fix things. I could get behind that but what about the minority students who have already graduated out of high school and college and won’t get to benefit from new programs? Where does that leave them?

According to you, sacrifice a few for the good of the whole. Better education benefits minorities as a whole. You can't go around saying you're leaving a few behind when you're okay leaving ORMs behind every year for the betterment of the whole.
 
Nope, YOU fail. We say there is a 10 point boost. That is it. Stop pulling bullsh*t out of thin air. Please quote where we make those assumptions.

... No. You can only say that being URM is correlated with a 10-point difference in the apparent stats required, but since there's so much more to applications than GPA/MCAT, you absolutely cannot conclude that URM means a 10-point stat boost.
 
Of course not. But there's a difference between being afraid of being eaten by a shark and catching the plague when someone sneezes.



Well I think it's an unfounded fear. Like I said, it's not happening in today's society so why fear it?



True forgiveness IS forgetting dude. Explain to me again how someone has done something to YOU, other than tell you horror stories of the past, that made you think twice about trusting a doctor.



What? I have a problem with the system not the individual.



A LOT of these problems can be solved with better education. Have you seen how awful our education system is compared to some other developed countries? We have lots of room for improvement and I think this is our most practical method of solving these issues. But yeah keep scoffing at our ideas to improve things and continue accepting mediocrity.



Or maybe I was being extremely sarcastic and managed to FOOL ALL OF YOU *evil laugh*. Who knows though, right?!?! 😉 Reckoner would appreciate this.



I'm comparing the principle of utilitarian ethics that you so casually seem to support when it favors you.

So it's not OK to adopt this philosophy when it physically harms someone but when you're just casually throwing away someones dreams and aspirations it's alright? Tell me, where do you draw the line?

Sacrificing the individual to better society is a slippery slope.



No, actually it would be allowing white people boosts because of the CHANCE that they MIGHT make their team better. Like saying they are going to improve the team because they'd appeal to the white population and increase the TV ratings and ticket purchases to games. Make sure we add some LGBT in there, we want trans people watching basketball too.
____________
Look, the problem is, this system is catering to the needs of a generation that is either dead or going to be dead soon. Our generation has NO PRESENT REASON to doubt the motives of our physicians. If this policy was in place a long time ago, it would make more sense.
"[That I] casually seem to support when it favors [me]? Where are you getting this from?! How do you know what benefits me and what doesn't? And you're assuming that I only "favor" something simply because I'm a URM and that it'll enhance my position sometime in the future, correct?! As if I didn't explore this topic thoroughly to reach my conclusions. As if I haven't worked exceptionally hard to be where I'm at now. You can state your opinion, but there's no need to be presumptuous.
 
According to you, sacrifice a few for the good of the whole. Better education benefits minorities as a whole. You can't go around saying you're leaving a few behind when you're okay leaving ORMs behind every year for the betterment of the whole.
They are not getting left behind. You are implying ORM's get left behind because URM's are succeeding.
 
... No. You can only say that being URM is correlated with a 10-point difference in the apparent stats required,

Yes that is what I am saying. And have been for the past 3 posts. Have a great day now.
 
They are not getting left behind. You are implying ORM's get left behind because URM's are succeeding.

Lol okay fine, I will not argue with someone who can't admit to the basics of how URM boost (not discussing warranted or not) works. It is pretty much fact there is a biased. What we discuss at length is whether it is ethical. If you can't even admit that then we are done.
 
The fact that you can't see the difference between correlation and causation is cause for concern.

Quote me where I say "URMs cause a 10 point boost." I say "there is a 10 point boost." Your interpretation of my very simple posts is riddled with your personal opinions and biases that can't get past the SIMPLE fact that there is a 10 point boost in URM acceptance stats.
 
Quote me where I say "URMs cause a 10 point boost." I say "there is a 10 point boost." Your interpretation of my very simple posts is riddled with your personal opinions and biases that can't get past the SIMPLE fact that there is a 10 point boost in URM acceptance stats.

You say there is a 10-point boost. This means that being a URM is equivalent to a 10-point boost in MCAT/GPA stats.

The supplied data does not support that. Not even remotely. The data simply says that accepted white students tend to have ~10 point lower stats than accepted URMs. The URM "boost" cannot be determined because we don't know the other relevant trends.
 
Top