- Joined
- Feb 22, 2004
- Messages
- 381
- Reaction score
- 0
Does URM status help for medical school?
amnesia said:Does URM status help for medical school?
wetlightning said:100+ posts and a question like this??
i won't say anymore and risk a flame-war 🙄
amnesia said:Does URM status help for medical school?
Fenrezz said:To answer the question, yes it does help. Just be prepared to get flamed by a bunch of rich white kids who are angry because they have to work a little harder to get accepted to medical school.
amnesia said:Does URM status help for medical school?
crazy_cavalier said:The politically correct answer to this question:
Well, first we have to clear up what the definition of "URM" is... and also, we should elaborate on the definition of "help"... and while we're at it, we should define what "medical school" is, and also we might wanna just touch-base on "status"...
"To answer the question, yes it does help. Just be prepared to get flamed by a bunch of rich white kids who are angry because they have to work a little harder to get accepted to medical school."
amnesia said:Does URM status help for medical school?
knight12 said:I believe strongly that race should not be a factor in such cases as medical school/college admission and if anything, the economics status of individuals should be used to determine who is in need of assistance for admission. For example, why should a white individual who lives in the "ghetto" along with a black individual be neglected and the black individual given an advantage? That's just unfair. Also, shouldn't the best candidate no matter what race, sex, or age be the one who is accepted? Isn't that the purpose of such selectivity in admission? This, for the most part, should yield better doctors in the long run.
knight12 said:I believe strongly that race should not be a factor in such cases as medical school/college admission and if anything, the economics status of individuals should be used to determine who is in need of assistance for admission. For example, why should a white individual who lives in the "ghetto" along with a black individual be neglected and the black individual given an advantage? That's just unfair. Also, shouldn't the best candidate no matter what race, sex, or age be the one who is accepted? Isn't that the purpose of such selectivity in admission? This, for the most part, should yield better doctors in the long run.
knight12 said:I believe strongly that race should not be a factor in such cases as medical school/college admission and if anything, the economics status of individuals should be used to determine who is in need of assistance for admission. For example, why should a white individual who lives in the "ghetto" along with a black individual be neglected and the black individual given an advantage? That's just unfair. Also, shouldn't the best candidate no matter what race, sex, or age be the one who is accepted? Isn't that the purpose of such selectivity in admission? This, for the most part, should yield better doctors in the long run.
Loco Loki said:the opening idiot shots have already been fired.
Fenrezz said:I rest my case.
knight12 said:I believe strongly that race should not be a factor in such cases as medical school/college admission and if anything, the economics status of individuals should be used to determine who is in need of assistance for admission. For example, why should a white individual who lives in the "ghetto" along with a black individual be neglected and the black individual given an advantage? That's just unfair. Also, shouldn't the best candidate no matter what race, sex, or age be the one who is accepted? Isn't that the purpose of such selectivity in admission? This, for the most part, should yield better doctors in the long run.
Fenrezz said:And then of course, we have the knee-jerk reaction.
URMamnesia said:Does URM status help for medical school?
Shredder said:URM
35 MCAT
3.8 GPA
nothing else significant
=any med school in the country with scholarship
no kidding, i was walking around campus the other day and overheard some URMs discussing 14k yearly scholarship for maintaining 2.5 gpa. pretty good deal. sigh...politics
of course you are 100% right but URM designation is not what it was intended to be; it turned into race insteadknight12 said:I believe strongly that race should not be a factor in such cases as medical school/college admission and if anything, the economics status of individuals should be used to determine who is in need of assistance for admission. For example, why should a white individual who lives in the "ghetto" along with a black individual be neglected and the black individual given an advantage? That's just unfair. Also, shouldn't the best candidate no matter what race, sex, or age be the one who is accepted? Isn't that the purpose of such selectivity in admission? This, for the most part, should yield better doctors in the long run.
exactly, it SHOULD be for socioeconomic status, but it is NOT. And the poor white boy who grew up in Harlem with nothing will be discriminated against in admissions whereas the black boy from Beverly Hills who drives a Porche and lives in a mansion will be giving URM status. But hey nothing's wrong with the system, is there?KNightInBlue said:Two things - first, socioeconomic status is NOT taken into consideration for admissions. So all you need to be is white to get screwed over, not neccessarily rich.
Second, its not just whites who are ORM.
As for the OPs question - yes, it matters. Ppl might discount individual experiences as transitory and therefore not neccessarily case in point, but after seeing SIX such cases in the same year, I must say, it helps.
knight12 said:I believe strongly that race should not be a factor in such cases as medical school/college admission and if anything, the economics status of individuals should be used to determine who is in need of assistance for admission. For example, why should a white individual who lives in the "ghetto" along with a black individual be neglected and the black individual given an advantage? That's just unfair. Also, shouldn't the best candidate no matter what race, sex, or age be the one who is accepted? Isn't that the purpose of such selectivity in admission? This, for the most part, should yield better doctors in the long run.
criminallyinane said:On the AMCAS app there is a place to talk about whether you are a disadvantaged applicant and to comment on why you believe you are. So regardless of race, you can get recognized for your achievements if you work your way out of the ghetto.
I think AA is necessary, but very easy manipulated. A girl I went to college with had a dad who grew up in Mexico. He wasn't Mexican-born, his parents and he were both from the US, but his parents' work took them to Mexico, where he was raised. He spoke English and Spanish. He moved back to the US and married, had kids. His kid went to college with me and told me that she had put that she was hispanic on her application because her dad was a Mexican citizen and a US citizen. Um, that doesn't make her hispanic. She is actually Polish and English. That annoyed me... she's reaping the benefits of AA while actually being a very rich white girl who grew up in the city.
Psycho Doctor said:exactly why it NEEDS to be based on socioeconomic status and NOT race!
velocypedalist said:holy crap I agree with Psycho, somebody shoot me in the face...
Of course, that's the whole intended point of AA...however that is not the way it was utilized, therefore turning it into a reverse discrimination and making people racist in the process. It's also the priniciple of the whole thing.velocypedalist said:agreeing with you makes me resent my position 😀...but its true. The most equitalbe thing would be to base AA on socioeconomic factors, I think that is most true to the most important mission of AA, which is to allow for social mobility.
That said, AA isn't really that big of a deal. If you're a non-URM don't waste your time worrying about other people's applications. If you're a strong candidate you'll get in. The only people that you could remotely argue "lose their spot" because of AA are the borderline candidates who could not make it in for any number of reasons. So if you're worried about AA, stop it and spend that energy turning yourself from an iffy applicant into a solid one...
Psycho Doctor said:I don't personally care for me; it's those hard-working borderline kids who perhaps grew up in a poor socio-economic area that truly loses out.
Psycho Doctor said:Of course, that's the whole intended point of AA...however that is not the way it was utilized, therefore turning it into a reverse discrimination and making people racist in the process. It's also the priniciple of the whole thing.
I don't personally care for me; it's those hard-working borderline kids who perhaps grew up in a poor socio-economic area that truly loses out.
visualwealth said:blah blah blah, those same kids you speak of would probably want to open a practice in a rich area and make money also. Face it, many of the people who are against AA are selfish!!! What one has to understand is all of the people getting AA are qualifed for med school. That is, they have what it takes to be doctor. What AA does is it ensures that schools are recruiting URM's. Think about it, would any school really want to take any URM's if they could just take all rich kids, or kids who had connections?? The school system is a little flawed today that is, many people can cheat, or pay their way to having great grades and great mcat scores. What the med school people have realized is that these numbers don't mean much. In all honesty the hopkins and harvard class could be filled with 3.95's and 40 mcats but instead they really look for characteristics that cannot be measured in numbers.
All in all, the urm debate is really not a debate and should not be argued. Think about the NBA (national basketball association).. Right now every team in the league is desperate for a top center, and if they find one they are willing to pay him any amount of money... The URM situation is similar...That is, if a minority is qualified then obviously school will be looking to grab them.
One last point, urm's dont get a free ride into med school. I know some urms with great grades and mcats that did not get a full ride to a top 20 schools and a benz... Most of the minorities that do well in the process are simply amazing people 👍
👍velocypedalist said:agreeing with you makes me resent my position 😀...but its true. The most equitalbe thing would be to base AA on socioeconomic factors, I think that is most true to the most important mission of AA, which is to allow for social mobility.
That said, AA isn't really that big of a deal. If you're a non-URM don't waste your time worrying about other people's applications. If you're a strong candidate you'll get in. The only people that you could remotely argue "lose their spot" because of AA are the borderline candidates who could not make it in for any number of reasons. So if you're worried about AA, stop it and spend that energy turning yourself from an iffy applicant into a solid one...
Loco Loki said:You ever look up hypocrisy?
Fenrezz said:I rest my case.
amnesia said:Does URM status help for medical school?
amnesia said:Does URM status help for medical school?
Psycho Doctor said:exactly, it SHOULD be for socioeconomic status, but it is NOT. And the poor white boy who grew up in Harlem with nothing will be discriminated against in admissions whereas the black boy from Beverly Hills who drives a Porche and lives in a mansion will be giving URM status. But hey nothing's wrong with the system, is there?
KNightInBlue said:Two things - first, socioeconomic status is NOT taken into consideration for admissions. So all you need to be is white to get screwed over, not neccessarily rich.
Second, its not just whites who are ORM.
As for the OPs question - yes, it matters. Ppl might discount individual experiences as transitory and therefore not neccessarily case in point, but after seeing SIX such cases in the same year, I must say, it helps.
amnesia said:Does URM status help for medical school?
Ummmmmmmmmmmm..............stop saying "ummmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm" dumboriceman04 said:Ummmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm..........read MSAR foolio
yup, that sounds about right. the system is flawed and we all know it.KNightInBlue said:Ummmmmmmmmmmm..............stop saying "ummmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm" dumbo
What are you? in junior high?
Now lets debate PROPERLY. Tell me exactly what was wrong in my post and prove me wrong by showing where the MSAR contradicts it and I will accede your point.
And dont say its that part of the AMCAS that allows you to write one paragraph about your disadvantaged status, 'cuz that's bulls*** (a director of admissions herself told me so).
Wow, very testy!KNightInBlue said:Ummmmmmmmmmmm..............stop saying "ummmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm" dumbo
What are you? in junior high?
Now lets debate PROPERLY. Tell me exactly what was wrong in my post and prove me wrong by showing where the MSAR contradicts it and I will accede your point.
And dont say its that part of the AMCAS that allows you to write one paragraph about your disadvantaged status, 'cuz that's bulls*** (a director of admissions herself told me so).
amnesia said:Does URM status help for medical school?
it. said:step 1: change name to tyrone jackson
step 2: sign changed name on blank piece of paper
step 3: send in paper to med schools
step 4: get accepted
j/k. i don't mean to undermine all those deserving, hardworking urms out there, but every now and then, i kinda do wish i were an urm, cuz that extra little umph just might get you in. to answer your question though, yes.
riceman04 said:Wow, very testy!
Yes, there are flaws in almost everything existing in today's society. Explain why there is a flaw in the public education system that damn near ensures that schools in poorer neighborhoods are not funded as well as schools in wealthier neighborhoods. Explain why kids in these disadvantaged neighborhoods often have to go without proper school materials and an actual teacher simply because their school does not have the same resources. Explain why there is such a discepancy in healthcare.
riceman04 said:So by this logic why not just base the diversity of a med school on socio-economic background and remove any element of race? This would shut up all of the people who claim URM's get in unfairly and since a higher % of minorities are poor they will benefit to a greater extent (as a population) from strictly a socio-economic classification.
As for this thread, as I do far more reading than posting on this site many of you demonstrate intelligence and passion from your viewpoints, and if you continue on your path to medicine you will be the positive role models in your community, I don't think attacking anyone who disagrees with you projects the image of a benevolent and wise individual that seem to be in such short supply these days. just my 2 cents
BeBlessedMD said:Heres some questions to ponder as well....
Does being from a influential "majority" family help you get into med school? YES
Does being just a plain "majority" applicant help you get into med school? YES
Does coming from a family full of doctor's help you get into med school? YES
Cleary if your not disadvantaged, then you are ADVANTAGED. I dont even know why you people are comparing yourselves to URM's. We are two entirely different entities. It wasn't until the mid 60's that we actually gained full "legal" civil rights in this country. When you look at a black person in your med class do realize he was NOT GIVEN that seat...his people had to be TORTURED and KILLED for him to sit there. How many of your people died fighting to have the chance to be equal in America? Be assured that we werent and arent given anything, weve demanded it and taken it ourselves. Give credit where the credit is due and stop actin like we po' and helpless negros are still relyin on our majority superiors to give us free hand outs. You are ALL FOOLS. 😱
beefballs said:riceman04 said:Wow, very testy!
Yes, there are flaws in almost everything existing in today's society. Explain why there is a flaw in the public education system that damn near ensures that schools in poorer neighborhoods are not funded as well as schools in wealthier neighborhoods. Explain why kids in these disadvantaged neighborhoods often have to go without proper school materials and an actual teacher simply because their school does not have the same resources. Explain why there is such a discepancy in healthcare.riceman04 said:So by this logic why not just base the diversity of a med school on socio-economic background and remove any element of race? This would shut up all of the people who claim URM's get in unfairly and since a higher % of minorities are poor they will benefit to a greater extent (as a population) from strictly a socio-economic classification.
As for this thread, as I do far more reading than posting on this site many of you demonstrate intelligence and passion from your viewpoints, and if you continue on your path to medicine you will be the positive role models in your community, I don't think attacking anyone who disagrees with you projects the image of a benevolent and wise individual that seem to be in such short supply these days. just my 2 cents
Are you saying that I was attacking the other people who disagreed with me? B/c clearly that was not my intention.