Originally posted by booshwa
FYI, the testing schedule (not the boards) at SC is in three parts (they call it triple jump). In one section students are given a PBL case like they recieve every week except it is to be done individually, and they have 24 hours to research it, and then present it. A second part would be clinical and depends what the student is learning in lab at the time. The third part is a standard type test that follows a format similar to the board tests. Students are given a list of what will be covered on the test, and they are able to study appropriately for it. It is not directionless, but indeed is very specific.
This is fairly inaccurate....Testing goes more like this:
Test 1 = Triple Jump - We are each given a case and have less than 24 hours (more like 18, 19) not to "solve" necessarily, but to understand and make a differential diagnosis ("tunnel vision" is not praised in PBL)
Test 2 = Multiple Choice test - Roughly 200 questions, many taken from old board exams, most pertaining to the material we covered in the cases (about 97%), ususally focusing on the bigger, main topics, and we are NOT given a list of what to study.
Test 3 = computer test - roughly 100 questions one a computer screen that are visual images that we have to recognize the structures they are pointing to, answer questions about the image, etc
Test 4 - ? = Clincial exam...depends on what we are covering at the time...last set of midterms, we had one clinical exam....this round of finals, we only have 1.
PS: I think some of you guys on here are being a little bit harsh with USC. Don't knock it till you try it. I love PBL, I am learning A LOT, doing well, and I have few complaints. I know it is not perfect or for everyone, but don't scare away the people who are interested. Every school has its problems, and students complain at every school, but USC in particular is in the limelight because it is a revolutionary program. just my thoughts!
Good luck to everyone accepted and in the waiting process!!