Just found out last week that I was accepted into Loma Linda University's Program for Research Epidemiology and this week into USC's Epi program as well. I have a couple of questions!
1. USC - PH program is thru their med school; LLU - had their own PH school. Does this matter?
2. If anyone knows, what are the main differences between the programs?
Please shed your thoughts on the two schools with pros and cons. I would GREATLY appreciate your advice 🙂
Well LLU is ranked on US News best public health graduate schools and USC isn't if that helps ::shrugs::
Also did you have an interview and if you did when? I had my interview this past Monday and it wasn't as nerve racking as I thought it would be. Last question, sorry, did you appky through sophas? And if you did when did you send in your transcripts to LLU was it before you were accepted?
But then you have to look further in to why LLU is ranked while USC is not. It's like you said earlier, USC's is offered through USC/Keck School of Medicine while LLU is through their own school. US News' rankings are for schools of public health therefore USC can't be ranked because it's not its own school.
LLU is an ASPH member school and USC isn't. As an LLU grad, you would be eligible for ASPH fellowships and internships that someone from a non-ASPH school would not be.
I got through LLU and am still waiting on USC. I read through the comments in this thread and am still confused about which one is better. Any comments?