- Joined
- Jul 11, 2006
- Messages
- 619
- Reaction score
- 62
Any thoughts on "High profile/famous" patients requesting to use their alias for prescriptions?
That's kind of scary. If one of them was a dick couldn't they just ask Walgreens for a trace of anyone who downloaded and viewed their profile without a medically necessary reason?Theoretically it's unnecessary due to hipaa. Although I have certainly heard stories of techs working at major chains typing in celebrity names, so I can definitely see why they would want that additional layer of security.
I don't think Walgreens would be required to track or maintain this type of data. Who access the profile unusually isn't part of the "medical record" so Walgreens could just claim it a business information.That's kind of scary. If one of them was a dick couldn't they just ask Walgreens for a trace of anyone who downloaded and viewed their profile without a medically necessary reason?
I don't think Walgreens would be required to track or maintain this type of data. Who access the profile unusually isn't part of the "medical record" so Walgreens could just claim it a business information.
I was under the impression that anything done while logged on to the system is trackable. This actually happened at Cedars last year, 6 people (4 physicians) got fired for viewing Kim Kardashian's medical records when she gave birthI don't think Walgreens would be required to track or maintain this type of data. Who access the profile unusually isn't part of the "medical record" so Walgreens could just claim it a business information.
I've got enough prescribers who don't even put their own real name on prescriptions they write for no good reason that this seems like an unimportant matter ("Oh, my real name is John, but I go by Jack" or "Oh, that's my middle name. I just use that so when I call in a prescription and you try to look up my license I don't seem to exist and then your patient is angry that you couldn't fill their prescription"). In fact, in California, you don't even need to create a patient record at all if you don't expect that you will be filling additional prescriptions for them in the future, so why would using a nickname be any worse than no record at all?Any thoughts on "High profile/famous" patients requesting to use their alias for prescriptions?
We let people use fake names/addresses at the ED to get their Norco scripts that they pay cash for, why should celebrities be any different?