using # of singles in area as med school selection criteria?

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.
I think that girls on the East Coast walk more, especially in cities like New York and Boston, spend less time in cars, and generally have better looking and more muscular butts because of the extra exercise than girls on the West Coast. I could be wrong, but that is my impression. I think that this is also true for med students. So the message is clear - drive less and have a better butt.

We do what now?
 
so I was in Chiptole getting my lunch (At UCB), and the 10 person in front of me and the ten person behind me were in fact,

dudes.

it's cuz the girls don't want to fart from eating beans:laugh:
 
Members don't see this ad :)
well one thing i noticed is that girls on the west coast wear a lot less clothing cuz of all the beaches. That's an item on the pro list for me... good thing my girlfriend doesn't read SDN
 
since when did people start assuming that single=ugly/undesirable?
i am not a spokesperson for single people, but c'mon, this is a HUGE stereotype.:(

I'm not saying equals. I am saying correlation. It has nothing to do with stereotype -- it is common sense, that undesirable people are less likely to be paired up. If you are undesirable, you are more likely to be single. This doesn't mean desirable single people don't exist -- they do. Just that when you have a big pocket of single people, some percentage will not be single by accident. So huge pockets of single people of either sex is probably also correlated to a huge pocket of undesirable people. Which explains the map above. Doesn't mean there aren't desirable single people, just that they tend not to stay single as long and so there is high turn over and they don't become a spot on the map. So I'm saying the spots on the map are not where you want to be if you are of the opposite sex because there may well be a reason for all those singles. You want a place with better turn over, a shorter shelf life.:D
 
I'm not saying equals. I am saying correlation. It has nothing to do with stereotype -- it is common sense, that undesirable people are less likely to be paired up. If you are undesirable, you are more likely to be single. This doesn't mean desirable single people don't exist -- they do. Just that when you have a big pocket of single people, some percentage will not be single by accident. So huge pockets of single people of either sex is probably also correlated to a huge pocket of undesirable people. Which explains the map above. Doesn't mean there aren't desirable single people, just that they tend not to stay single as long and so there is high turn over and they don't become a spot on the map. So I'm saying the spots on the map are not where you want to be if you are of the opposite sex because there may well be a reason for all those singles. You want a place with better turn over, a shorter shelf life.:D

It is all just math. I try to analyze relationships and values, and understand the influence of culture and parents and language, but in the end, it really is just math. So when you mate, understand that it is all just math. Math wins.
 
On the other hand, if you want to up your chances, you can always come to miami...that's never a bad choice...

South_beach_miami_at_night.jpg


There's LOTS of good stuff here, but that one's up to you...

Good stuff, my buddy's apartment would probably be in that photo if those palm trees weren't there on the right... by the corner of 14th. And that's probably where I'll be living next year :smuggrin:
 
It is all just math. I try to analyze relationships and values, and understand the influence of culture and parents and language, but in the end, it really is just math. So when you mate, understand that it is all just math. Math wins.

mathmatically with all the asian males and females in the world that there would be an equal number of caucasian male asian female couples as there are asian male caucasian female couples.

But as reality has shown me, that is just not the case. :(
 
NY/DC are like a magnet for single women. A big magnet made out of money and power.
 
I'm not saying equals. I am saying correlation. It has nothing to do with stereotype -- it is common sense, that undesirable people are less likely to be paired up. If you are undesirable, you are more likely to be single. This doesn't mean desirable single people don't exist -- they do. Just that when you have a big pocket of single people, some percentage will not be single by accident. So huge pockets of single people of either sex is probably also correlated to a huge pocket of undesirable people. Which explains the map above. Doesn't mean there aren't desirable single people, just that they tend not to stay single as long and so there is high turn over and they don't become a spot on the map. So I'm saying the spots on the map are not where you want to be if you are of the opposite sex because there may well be a reason for all those singles. You want a place with better turn over, a shorter shelf life.:D
:laugh: that also means a higher referral rate to infectious disease specialists...hmmm SINGLE MEN--PLEASE TAKE NOTICE...--a good specialty choice for you.
 
re: Law2Doc comment:a high turnover rate might not be a good sign at all, a very alarming sign actually. suppose a guy is never single, always taken, but for a very short time. he could be a complete headcase, and then his partner dumps him after she realizes that. So "the headcase" is onto his next victim.....and the cycle continues

The bottom line is: don't look at this map, go where you'll be able to prosper academically, personally, and you'll find that SPECIAL ONE when everything else is right in ur life.

ok off to bed... i just needed to get that thought out of my system:D
:sleep::sleep::sleep:
 
mathmatically with all the asian males and females in the world that there would be an equal number of caucasian male asian female couples as there are asian male caucasian female couples.

But as reality has shown me, that is just not the case. :(

lol :laugh:
 
re: Law2Doc comment:a high turnover rate might not be a good sign at all, a very alarming sign actually. suppose a guy is never single, always taken, but for a very short time. he could be a complete headcase,

But he is apparently a desirable headcase. Which means a lot of women want to date him, including med students. So if you are picking a location for your social life, this may not be a bad thing, at least for a while. If you are looking for your ultimate mate, then maybe not. But there are no maps for places with the most marry-worthy people. Just singles. And so I still say avoid the dots on that above map -- those are the locations where the turnover is bad and the singles are getting stale and moldy from lack of desirability.:laugh:
 
But he is apparently a desirable headcase. Which means a lot of women want to date him, including med students. So if you are picking a location for your social life, this may not be a bad thing, at least for a while. If you are looking for your ultimate mate, then maybe not. But there are no maps for places with the most marry-worthy people. Just singles. And so I still say avoid the dots on that above map -- those are the locations where the turnover is bad and the singles are getting stale and moldy from lack of desirability.:laugh:

nooooo,
Law2doc, my example means that your theory is WRONG... too many confounding factors.
again i repeat, SINGLE does not equal undesirable, it could mean the person is too picky, is too busy, and very much DESIRABLE.
on the other hand TAKEN, does not mean desirable--it could mean a fast-turnover headcase, a sex-addict, a perpetual dater, etc.....

you are simply WRONG, law2doc... sorry:p
 
Top