thaddeus

7+ Year Member
Aug 13, 2011
77
48
Status
Resident [Any Field]
Hello sage SDNers, does anyone have a good rubric for coming up with a V20 dose constraint in a lung cancer patient with a collapsed lobe due to tumor obstruction? I'm planning a patient with a RUL collapse currently; the usual V20 < 30% constraint is easily met, but obviously there is a lot of RUL lung parenchyma getting high dose that is not contoured as lung. I think a more conservative constraint would be appropriate, but not sure how conservative it needs to be. Thoughts?
 

radmonckey

5+ Year Member
Aug 6, 2013
223
198
Status
Attending Physician
Hello sage SDNers, does anyone have a good rubric for coming up with a V20 dose constraint in a lung cancer patient with a collapsed lobe due to tumor obstruction? I'm planning a patient with a RUL collapse currently; the usual V20 < 30% constraint is easily met, but obviously there is a lot of RUL lung parenchyma getting high dose that is not contoured as lung. I think a more conservative constraint would be appropriate, but not sure how conservative it needs to be. Thoughts?
If you are meeting V20<30% already you are likely fine, as that is already slightly conservative. I typically think of 35-37% as the upper limits. Additionally in your favor is that the upper lobe is less important than the middle/lower lobes.

I think you are wise to be mindful of the idea of dose to the unaerated lobe, but I am not familiar with a mathematical way to account for this other than applying common sense. If you get overly conservative you may just end up driving dose centrally to the heart/esophagus which could be bad.
 
OP
thaddeus

thaddeus

7+ Year Member
Aug 13, 2011
77
48
Status
Resident [Any Field]
thanks radmonckey! will sleep better with your reassurance.
 
About the Ads