- Joined
- Dec 25, 2008
- Messages
- 8,115
- Reaction score
- 7,403
Apparently the RIF injunction got overturned by the Supreme Court. Kind of feels like we’re quickly getting rid of the legislative branch and just governing solely by the executive now. 🤷♀️
Apparently the RIF injunction got overturned by the Supreme Court. Kind of feels like we’re quickly getting rid of the legislative branch and just governing solely by the executive now. 🤷♀️
Yeah, it’s baffling to me, because politicians love power.To be fair, the current legislative branch has willingly given that power away recently.
It's hard to have power when a few wealthy people can just fund a primary challenge if you get out of line.Yeah, it’s baffling to me, because politicians love power.
Hearing a lot of grumbling about burnout from both other MH providers and primary care teams. The short staffing and hiring freezes are starting to take their toll. Anyone else?
Our staffing is okay, but RTO is burning us out since it's a more rural hospital. I have two days week where I only see virtual clients, and it's a wasted hour commute plus traffic. I'm having to use a lot of sick leave for OB appointments since my doctor is close to home, not work. I wonder if I can push for RA since it's temporary.Hearing a lot of grumbling about burnout from both other MH providers and primary care teams. The short staffing and hiring freezes are starting to take their toll. Anyone else?
Morale is....not high with my friends and colleagues at the local VAMC
Hearing a lot of grumbling about burnout from both other MH providers and primary care teams. The short staffing and hiring freezes are starting to take their toll. Anyone else?
If we are going to fire a group of people...Anyone else find the REACH Vet program insulting to clinicians?
The classic meeting to discuss "how we are all too busy to even be having these meetings, but are not actually planning to change things." My favorite.I’ve posted about this before but our staffing shortage is notable and we’ve had multiple meetings about how our caseloads are unmanageable.
The classic meeting to discuss "how we are all too busy to even be having these meetings, but are not actually planning to change things." My favorite.
Nothing imo is as bad as meetings to discuss your clinic's/team's goals for the year. I've even seen that eat up half day team retreats or meetings.
My old mentor was the PTSD section chief at her VAMC. Her parting wisdom was "for the love of god, stay away from anything supervisory" as her entire life is what you described over and over.Nothing imo is as bad as meetings to discuss your clinic's/team's goals for the year. I've even seen that eat up half day team retreats or meetings.
My old mentor was the PTSD section chief at her VAMC. Her parting wisdom was "for the love of god, stay away from anything supervisory" as her entire life is what you described over and over.
For a high enough salary, I would be in that meeting, but I'm guessing my number is above what the VA ponies up for such a position.
Two step rule, so $5-10k ballpark.For a high enough salary, I would be in that meeting, but I'm guessing my number is above what the VA ponies up for such a position.
1000000000%Anyone else find the REACH Vet program insulting to clinicians?
Anyone else find the REACH Vet program insulting to clinicians?
Yikes. Almost all of the people assigned to be a REACH VET coordinator didn’t ask or choose to be in that role, but have had to take it on due to job descriptions that require us to be involved with suicide prevention and/or suicide prevention staff shortages. I know it’s a nuisance, but don’t take it out on the providers who are assigned to that role without any choice.If we are going to fire a group of people...
I can have some due sympathy for those forced into the position.Yikes. Almost all of the people assigned to be a REACH VET coordinator didn’t ask or choose to be in that role, but have had to take it on due to job descriptions that require us to be involved with suicide prevention and/or suicide prevention staff shortages. I know it’s a nuisance, but don’t take it out on the providers who are assigned to that role without any choice.
I used to be a reach vet coordinator and the amount of rude messages we received from our colleagues was astonishing. It’s not meant to be an offense to your clinical skills — we literally just receive a list of 50 veterans at high risk for negative outcomes and have to alert their provider. For most providers, this is just for awareness and nothing about their clinical approach/case conceptualization changes because they are already doing everything that would be recommended. Just enter a note stating that no changes are clinically indicated.
Believe me — I always wished REACH VET would go away because it’s a ton of busy work on the coordinator’s end, but I doubt it’s going anywhere because the VA never gets rid of these sort of things. Don’t take it on the REACH VET coordinator and bring up your concerns with suicide prevention and VA higher ups! I always told our suicide prevention team how much hate we get as coordinators, but that hasn’t transferred to any changes…
1000%. My former VA mentor told me the same thing. He was a lifer, but a lot had changed in the past 10-15 years, mostly for the bad.My old mentor was the PTSD section chief at her VAMC. Her parting wisdom was "for the love of god, stay away from anything supervisory" as her entire life is what you described over and over.
Agreed. Plus, a bit of gallows humor on my part.I can have some due sympathy for those forced into the position.
However, I think that overall it's another one of those situations in which those providers would be better utilized engaging in direct clinical work with patients rather than administrative 'oversight' of the practicing clinicians.
And, I guess I should clarify...I find the existence of the REACH VET program itself insulting to clinicians. I have never felt insulted by the poor souls tasked with that work nor have I ever vented my frustrations at them.
Ok. But... "PTSD Section Chief" is...nothing. Lets be honest. I mean, is that even middle management? The title literally seems made up. And, 'section?" Get real. I've never seen anything called a "section" in my lifetime. This is 1940s nonsense. Its 2025. No one talks like that anymore.My old mentor was the PTSD section chief at her VAMC. Her parting wisdom was "for the love of god, stay away from anything supervisory" as her entire life is what you described over and over.
Have you worked in corporate America? That is exactly how it works. In fact, there are more layers of middle management. CEO, president, senior VP, associate VP, senior director, director, associate director, manager, associate manager, etc.Ok. But... "PTSD Section Chief" is...nothing. Lets be honest. I mean, is that even middle management? The title literally seems made up. And, 'section?" Get real. I've never seen anything called a "section" in my lifetime. This is 1940s nonsense. Its 2025. No one talks like that anymore.
But this is probably the problem too, right? Anyone who has more than 8 on a team people has to have a..."manager." Then a "director" beyond that. Then a "Section Chief." Then....whatever the ****. This isn't how corporate America works or is used to, right? It then gets very easy to trim government fat...yea?
I feel like you're trying to do a @Fan_of_Meehl shtick right here but he's often imitated never duplicatedOk. But... "PTSD Section Chief" is...nothing. Lets be honest. I mean, is that even middle management? The title literally seems made up. And, 'section?" Get real. I've never seen anything called a "section" in my lifetime. This is 1940s nonsense. Its 2025. No one talks like that anymore.
But this is probably the problem too, right? Anyone who has more than 8 on a team people has to have a..."manager." Then a "director" beyond that. Then a "Section Chief." Then....whatever the ****. This isn't how corporate America works or is used to, right? It then gets very easy to trim government fat...yea?
Here we have a psychologist Program Manager over the PTSD Clinic. Not sure if that's what a PTSD Section Chief is. Maybe at a bigger hospital network they have multiple PTSD clinics and there is someone over all of them. All I can say is that dealing with PTSD-related issues (assessment/diagnosis, treatment, managing co-morbidities) is a helluva thing at VA these days.Ok. But... "PTSD Section Chief" is...nothing. Lets be honest. I mean, is that even middle management? The title literally seems made up. And, 'section?" Get real. I've never seen anything called a "section" in my lifetime. This is 1940s nonsense. Its 2025. No one talks like that anymore.
But this is probably the problem too, right? Anyone who has more than 8 on a team people has to have a..."manager." Then a "director" beyond that. Then a "Section Chief." Then....whatever the ****. This isn't how corporate America works or is used to, right? It then gets very easy to trim government fat...yea?
Everywhere as part of the FLOW initiative (AKA people get discharged from MH). It's actually the only metric being used for the FLOW initiative, which makes perfect sense because it has nothing to do with FLOW.Is the big push to do the PHQ-9 more often everywhere or are we just special?
I had no idea the two were connected. All we're doing for FLOW is awkwardly secure messaging/calling patients we haven't seen in forever to let them know they're being discharged from MHC back to PC. Then we have to explain what that means. I understand it conceptually. It has just been a mess. The PCPs hate it. It's only appropriate for a handful of patient. It requires the providers to reach out individually to each person. It's not been smooth so far.Everywhere as part of the FLOW initiative (AKA people get discharged from MH). It's actually the only metric being used for the FLOW initiative, which makes perfect sense because it has nothing to do with FLOW.
What an incredibly efficient way to utilize providers’ time.I had no idea the two were connected. All we're doing for FLOW is awkwardly secure messaging/calling patients we haven't seen in forever to let them know they're being discharged from MHC back to PC. Then we have to explain what that means. I understand it conceptually. It has just been a mess. The PCPs hate it. It's only appropriate for a handful of patient. It requires the providers to reach out individually to each person. It's not been smooth so far.
Yeah, it's not how I would have done it. No one I've contacted has responded so far.What an incredibly efficient way to utilize providers’ time.
The more and more I work on the front lines of MH care with veterans, the more and more I've come to regard the symptom self-report measures we're mandated to use with them (PCL, PHQ, GAD7) as, generally, utterly useless wastes of time and energy. People know how to circle higher rather than lower numbers next to cited symptoms.Is the big push to do the PHQ-9 more often everywhere or are we just special?
Yikes. Almost all of the people assigned to be a REACH VET coordinator didn’t ask or choose to be in that role, but have had to take it on due to job descriptions that require us to be involved with suicide prevention and/or suicide prevention staff shortages. I know it’s a nuisance, but don’t take it out on the providers who are assigned to that role without any choice.
I used to be a reach vet coordinator and the amount of rude messages we received from our colleagues was astonishing. It’s not meant to be an offense to your clinical skills — we literally just receive a list of 50 veterans at high risk for negative outcomes and have to alert their provider. For most providers, this is just for awareness and nothing about their clinical approach/case conceptualization changes because they are already doing everything that would be recommended. Just enter a note stating that no changes are clinically indicated.
Believe me — I always wished REACH VET would go away because it’s a ton of busy work on the coordinator’s end, but I doubt it’s going anywhere because the VA never gets rid of these sort of things. Don’t take it on the REACH VET coordinator and bring up your concerns with suicide prevention and VA higher ups! I always told our suicide prevention team how much hate we get as coordinators, but that hasn’t transferred to any changes…
Everywhere as part of the FLOW initiative (AKA people get discharged from MH). It's actually the only metric being used for the FLOW initiative, which makes perfect sense because it has nothing to do with FLOW.
Referring to travel pay stipend? This seemed absolutely out of control and mostly uncalled for years ago. Is it even worse now? I am all for the rural farm boy drafted some years ago....but this stuff? Get real.How are we supposed to place boundaries on therapy when people are literally paid to attend appts?
Referring to travel pay stipend? This seemed absolutely out of control and mostly uncalled for years ago. Is it even worse now? I am all for the rural farm boy drafted some years ago....but this stuff? Get real.
Probably not, I would say, actually. But it certainly has something to do with who they largely recruited 40 years ago. Not to mention who they managed to recruit at various other low periods (late 90s, 2010s?). I mean, in 1980, 81, 82, 83, who hell is joining the Army? And why? They even made a joke movie about them, for goodness sakes. Literally underachievers, poor health, or bad choice young men. But they came from all walks of life back then. Today, the idea that your screw-up son will be "fixed up right" by boot camp and some structure is outdated (rightfully so) and not welcome by the US armed forces. But not so back then.The inevitable result of recruiting from the lowest SES levels for decades.
I wouldn’t say recently - they’ve been ok with presidents waging wars abroad without a war declaration for decadesTo be fair, the current legislative branch has willingly given that power away recently.
I wouldn’t say recently - they’ve been ok with presidents waging wars abroad without a war declaration for decades
Finally going to get out from the VA....feels strange
Yeah, leaving VA can be a bit jarring at first, especially depending on how long you've been there, but I suspect you'll quickly come to appreciate the changes.Finally going to get out from the VA....feels strange
Congrats! Where’s the new gig?Finally going to get out from the VA....feels strange
Not much more than normal here. But it was bad to begin with for psychologists.Hearing a lot of grumbling about burnout from both other MH providers and primary care teams. The short staffing and hiring freezes are starting to take their toll. Anyone else?
Literally, 20 MH staff (Psychologist, Psychiatrists, SWs) have quit at my local VAMC and affiliated CBOCs since March. There have been 3 MH staff hires (so I'm told) during this time...and of course they have not been cleared yet to work. Wait times increased, services have been cut, BHIP teams overwhelmed. Moral? Motivation? In the toilet. An entire IOP program is at risk of being shutdown here. While it may not be this bad at other places...even close to that is bad enough. And 100% more layoffs are coming. Like, 100%.Not much more than normal here. But it was bad to begin with for psychologists.
A group private practice.Congrats! Where’s the new gig?