not specifically trauma therapy, but many send veterans over for "anger management"; upon interview these veterans have been court mandated to take anger management and are seeking a "certificate of completion" to show to a judge. i cringe at these referrals.
I do too. Haven't gotten many, but such a referral almost always means the veteran will be entering into 'therapy' only because they are being compelled and will, therefore, likely be stuck in pre-contemplation and be minimally invested in the therapy. However, for those who might be willing to work, I can offer them a CBT workbook on conceptualizing and dealing with anger in order to put some structure in place and have an objective body of therapeutic work that they can either actively engage (or not) and this can be documented.
'Treatment courts' (or whatever they're called) are a mixed-blessing and a good/bad idea. I remember cringing when I was reading about all the 'veteran treatment courts' that they were setting up. On the one hand, I think it is good that society is beginning to conceptualize the role of mental illness in predisposing people (including veterans) for behavioral outcomes that get them in trouble with the law and even endanger others. On the other hand, I despise the almost childlike 'black-or-white' categorical and dichotomous way of thinking about these things such as an individual case being entirely 'due to mental illness' vs. 'due to being a 'bad person/criminal''. We all know that reality is more complex than that and that--at the level of the individual, for instance, who has committed a crime out of anger being sent messages that it is 'not their fault' also can, unfortunately, send the message that refraining from the same type of criminal or dangerous behavior in the future is also 'not their responsibility.'
I also believe that it is a failure of wisdom on the part of society to promote separating people into different 'classes' of society with respect to things like the types of punishment they receive for violent offenses. If veterans with PTSD (or other mental illnesses such as depression, substance abuse, personality disorders) have a special 'track' in the criminal justice system that they are steered toward (or may avail themselves of) that is unavailable as an option for those people who have these same mental disorders but who happen not to be veterans then we are setting up veterans as a 'special class' of citizen to whom the laws relating to consequences for violent crimes do not apply (or, at least, do not apply in the same way). If the rationale is 'well, a veteran with PTSD (a mental illness) needs to have his/her mental illness (as a contributor to the violent behavior) taken into account and be steered more toward treatment/rehabilitation rather than punishment (fines/imprisonment), then why would that logic not also extend to the non-veteran offender?
This concern is relevant to the present context in the following manner:
If a veteran is told by the courts that they will be 'lenient' on him/her for their violent behavior and, thus, send them to therapy/rehab in lieu of a more traditional sentencing pathway, then it may be likely that the veteran will interpret this as indicating that he/she is not as culpable or responsible for regulating his behavior (aggression) as other members of society. This would be squarely at odds with the mindset that a veteran client would need to have entering into 'anger management.' If a veteran client presents (either implicitly or explicitly) with this viewpoint ('I can't help myself, I have PTSD and when idiots trigger me, I go off and God help them'), then--besides all the usual stuff regarding building the therapeutic alliance--the only practical approach left for the therapist is motivational interviewing + offering a body of work (active treatment) such as a CBT anger management workbook approach and successively cutting the workload for the patient (in terms of reading materials, completing worksheets/assignments) down into such small bite-sized pieces that the usual excuses such as 'I didn't have time to do it, was too busy' or 'I didn't understand the assignment' or 'I can't do this' are rendered so moot as to result in you and the patient staring into one another's eyes while your eyes simply reflect back into theirs: "Really?" Not in a cynical, demanding, contemptuous, or even pitying way...more just in a kind but reflective way. LOL. Been there many times. "Your move, Chief."