- Joined
- Jan 31, 2008
- Messages
- 274
- Reaction score
- 14
- Points
- 4,601
- Pre-Medical
Hey everybody,
Is there a disadvantage to maintaining a an intubated pt on pressure support compared to volume control if the tv and rr are the exact same? Atelectasis, wob?
I'll do some reading....but just yesterday I asked my attending if putting the pt on ps and making them work a little bit during a long case helped fight atrophy...I told her during intern year, the pulm guys were huge on daily weans to avoid atrophy of the diaphragm... I'm not sure if in the acute setting its as beneficial as it is in the icu. I guess it would be a matter of how long it takes for the "use it or lose it" to happen? I'll see what I come across
Anything wrong with pressure support though? If we used roc to intubate the pt for a 2hr case.... pt starts breathing with an hour to go and doesn't need paralysis for the end of the case, why not just leave him on pressure support for that hour?
Anything wrong with pressure support though? If we used roc to intubate the pt for a 2hr case.... pt starts breathing with an hour to go and doesn't need paralysis for the end of the case, why not just leave him on pressure support for that hour?
Ive always kinda wondered this but what do you think is the difference in the surgical field when the patient is triggering pressure supported breaths vs being controlled fully on the vent?
Why does pressure control produce a sustained pressure (raising Pmean) where as volume control hits a set volume and immediately drops (sometimes producing a higher Pmax)? The flat hill wave form of PC versus the Shark-fin of VC?
VCV = delivers constant flow, until volume target hit. Pressure is dependent variable (depends on compliance, etc.).
PCV = delivers set pressure with decelerating flow for set time. Volume is dependent variable (depends on driving pressure, compliance, etc.)