Verbal Reasoning Speed vs. Accuracy

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

TheBoneDoctah

Full Member
Volunteer Staff
10+ Year Member
Joined
Mar 12, 2013
Messages
12,665
Reaction score
8,444
I am working in the EK 101 verbal book and am having trouble with something. For me to adequately understand a passage throughly and be able to get 6/7ish correct, it takes me around 13 minutes to read and answer the questions. When I time myself and hurry through (finish in under 8 minutes), I find myself missing the main ideas that link the inferences together in the passage, which ultimately leads me to score much lower 3 or 4/7. I am scoring 8-9 averages in EK and need a 10 on the real deal. My test is April 24. Does anyone have any recommendations on how to improve reading speed while keeping everything straight in my head?
 
Just FYI, EK 101 passages + questions are not representative of AAMC ones AT ALL.

Also refer to this:

EK: Took me only 8 mins per passage
TPRH: Took me only 8 mins per passage
AAMC: Taking me 9~10 mins per passage

Maybe it's just me. I dont know. Take this with a grain of salt.
 
Just FYI, EK 101 passages + questions are not representative of AAMC ones AT ALL.

Also refer to this:

EK: Took me only 8 mins per passage
TPRH: Took me only 8 mins per passage
AAMC: Taking me 9~10 mins per passage

Maybe it's just me. I dont know. Take this with a grain of salt.
This doesn't help with the question. I am asking for tips to improve reading speed while keeping accuracy. I'm not asking for your times.
 
This doesn't help with the question. I am asking for tips to improve reading speed while keeping accuracy. I'm not asking for your times.

That's why I said "just for your information".
Also, I just told you this to warn you that AAMC passages take much longer than EK passages do.
So it's actually relevant to your question.
 
using EK first to get better with answering questions.
Then EK wont really help you.
EK questions suck. Just use them to practice your timing.
TPRH is pretty good though.

I also suck at verbal.. but try to focus on main point, not on details.
 
Can you please give an example?

I cant give you any specific "examples". You just have to experience it yourself. Try to take AAMC 3. It's free.
Many EK questions are detail-oriented while AAMC barely asks these kinds of questions.
AAMC focuses on MAIN POINTS.
 
I cant give you any specific "examples". You just have to experience it yourself. Try to take AAMC 3. It's free.
Many EK questions are detail-oriented while AAMC barely asks these kinds of questions.
AAMC focuses on MAIN POINTS.
I've taken AAMC 3-9 already. I averaged 8 on verbal.
 
Safe to say EK is harder (question wise) than AAMC?

For instance, in EK yesterday, a question in a specific passage required us to know the limited back story of the ten commandments to get the question right. I answered it correctly, but this just doesn't seem right/normal. Even the answer description in the back of the back specifically stated it is assumed you have a basic understanding of the ten commandments....
 
Safe to say EK is harder (question wise) than AAMC?

For instance, in EK yesterday, a question in a specific passage required us to know the limited back story of the ten commandments to get the question right. I answered it correctly, but this just doesn't seem right/normal. Even the answer description in the back of the back specifically stated it is assumed you have a basic understanding of the ten commandments....

A lot easier. But I saw some ppl saying EK questions are harder.
But tbh, I cant really compare them as EK questions are too different. Their reasoning doesnt make any sense sometimes unlike AAMC.
 
A lot easier. But I saw some ppl saying EK questions are harder.
But tbh, I cant really compare them as EK questions are too different. Their reasoning doesnt make any sense sometimes unlike AAMC.

I agree - I consider myself pretty logical, and there are times their correct explanations make little logical sense..or a wrong answered could easily be argued as being correct.

Questions like these are the ones I miss on EK. The more clear cut ones I always get right. Should I assume, (since you say AAMC isn't like this) I should anticipate doing better on AAMC VR?
 
I agree - I consider myself pretty logical, and there are times their correct explanations make little logical sense..or a wrong answered could easily be argued as being correct.

Questions like these are the ones I miss on EK. The more clear cut ones I always get right. Should I assume, (since you say AAMC isn't like this) I should anticipate doing better on AAMC VR?

If you have no problems with comprehending convoluted passages while reading fast, then yes.
 
I did EK passages for picking up speed but that was it. At first I took the time and read/answered all the questions with 100% accuracy. It took forever.

Then I tried different techniques to answer the questions, and picked the one that worked best for me.

Then I would give myself 15 minutes, and then 13 minutes, etc.

In the end I knew that I needed more time to answer the questions, rather than reading the darn thing because I had to go back and read parts of the passage again anyway!

So 1 - 2 minutes to skim, and then 1 minute for each question.

I've heard that EK has similar question asking styles as AAMC, but it is not as difficult as AAMC. People recommend doing BR instead (the diagnostic verbal tests) even though there's only a few.

In regards to your question, I think you should focus on trying to look for either key words like "but", "however", etc... and highlight those words/ words that help give you the main idea. It might help you speed up your reading. You should also try to read news articles and time yourself. I heard that NYT and Economists are the types of stuff on AAMC.

I'm not at a 10 yet, but these techniques helped me bring my score up from a 6 to a 9 (which I feel is a good improvement - almost there!)

Whenever I read, my eyes move in a zigzag pattern, and I try to capture main words, and highlight words I don't really understand (because there will probably be a question about it). I try to compartmentalize what each paragraph was about and take literally 5 seconds to kind of summarize the passage in 1 sentence, including stuff like author seemed angry, author is for blah. Don't waste time writing down what each paragraph is about and don't waste time trying to find which passage is "easier" or "harder". They're complete time wasters. AND even if you don't really get what's going on in the passage, the questions help you figure out what's going on most of the time anyway.

Sorry, this whole thing is super jumbled up.
 
Top