What problem can occur when a voltage greater than 1.86 volts in applied to an aqueous metal halide salt solution over a long duration of time?
A. Hydrolysis of water to yield H3O+ (aq) and OH- (aq) occurs once the metal cation is completely reduced.
B. Electrolysis of water to yield H2 (g) and O2 (g) occurs once the metal cation is completely reduced.
C. The metal is further reduced into metallic anions.
D. The halide is further oxidized into halogen cations.
B) Electrolysis of water to yield H2 (g) and O2 (g) occurs once the metal cation is completely reduced.
The addition of voltage does not form hydronium and hydroxide ions, because both oxygen and hydrogen carry the same oxidation states as they do in water. This means that no redox chemistry transpired, so voltage was not necessary. Choice A eliminated. The further reduction of metals to anions and halogens to cations is not realistic, so eliminate choice C & D. The addition of 1.86 volts can cause the reduction of protons to hydrogen gas and the reduction of oxygen within water to oxygen gas.
Can anyone explain this in another way, please?
A. Hydrolysis of water to yield H3O+ (aq) and OH- (aq) occurs once the metal cation is completely reduced.
B. Electrolysis of water to yield H2 (g) and O2 (g) occurs once the metal cation is completely reduced.
C. The metal is further reduced into metallic anions.
D. The halide is further oxidized into halogen cations.
B) Electrolysis of water to yield H2 (g) and O2 (g) occurs once the metal cation is completely reduced.
The addition of voltage does not form hydronium and hydroxide ions, because both oxygen and hydrogen carry the same oxidation states as they do in water. This means that no redox chemistry transpired, so voltage was not necessary. Choice A eliminated. The further reduction of metals to anions and halogens to cations is not realistic, so eliminate choice C & D. The addition of 1.86 volts can cause the reduction of protons to hydrogen gas and the reduction of oxygen within water to oxygen gas.
Can anyone explain this in another way, please?