Waiting time for NOACs and neuraxial

  • Thread starter Thread starter deleted875186
  • Start date Start date
This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.
D

deleted875186

So you have an adult that would benefit from a SAB or epidural for an elective surgery, is on a NOAC for afib, the cardiologist told them stop 2 days ago.

Would you do the neuraxial procedure?

If you look at the full updated ASRA guidelines it is a loose timeframe. It states in patients, non elderly, no CKD, taking 5 mg BID, a time of 40-72 hours is recommended. Somehow, in the the ASRA app, it states a flat out 72 hours? What do most people do, default to the most conservative timeframe?
 
1569546151818.png
 
Ok, so how about you have a healthy adult, going to get a thoracotomy for some type of tumor, postop pain and pulmonary status would greatly benefit from an epidural but they stopped their Eliquis 48 hours ago?
 
These days I mostly see Xarelto and Eliquis (besides Plavix or Effient). The Cardiologists typically stop them 3 days prior to surgery. I will do a single shot SAB for a patient who has D/C'd Plavix for 5 days but I require a PLAVIX NOW test. For Effient the D/C time is 7 days.

 
Ok, so how about you have a healthy adult, going to get a thoracotomy for some type of tumor, postop pain and pulmonary status would greatly benefit from an epidural but they stopped their Eliquis 48 hours ago?

I do an ESP on those patients. Sure, they aren't as good but they do work and are very safe. Others would do a Thoracic Epidural on a healthy adult off Xarelto/Eliquis for 48 hours.
 

Best to place a catheter as a single shot won't last very long. Even Exparel single shots won't give analgesia beyond 24 hours.

 

In summary, many practical and theoretical advantages of this block, including technical simplicity, direct ultrasound visualization, ability to perform the procedure under general anesthesia, less concern in case of a hematoma in an anticoagulated patient, and potentially less sympathectomy-related hypotension, make it an appealing modality in the lung transplant population and add to the very important component of patient care.

ESP work best with a LOT Of volume. I prefer low continuous infusions with large bolus infusions of dilute local. The problem with ESPs is that they require VOLUME to get good analgesia.
 
Whenever in doubt (e.g. CKD), I would advise people to postpone the block for postop, after they see (the lack of) intraop oozing. I've had a couple of cases where I was happy I had done so, even after 3 days.


In the end, it's a matter of risks vs benefits. I tend to have a very honest discussion with the patient and family.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Whenever in doubt (e.g. CKD), I would advise people to postpone the block for postop, after they see (the lack of) intraop oozing. I've had a couple of cases where I was happy I had done so, even after 3 days.


In the end, it's a matter of risks vs benefits. I tend to have a very honest discussion with the patient and family.
This is very true. Can always do a rescue block.
 
Top