Walgreens vs Walmart

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

iceprince99

New Member
Joined
Jan 28, 2019
Messages
2
Reaction score
1
I really need advice please. I was looking for a job for 2 months and finally got an offer with Walgreens for salaried full time floating position. I accepted it but then I got an interview with Walmart and they want to offer me a job. I told Walmart that I have an offer and the DM said he will try to give me a competitive pay (3dollars more) but it's not guaranteed full time. Although he did say that there will be plenty of extra shifts that I could pick up. (both will be salaried so I would get full benefits)
My first question is which company is better to work at. Most said Walmart is better since they have more tech hrs and a lunch break. Walgreens is a little more stressful since they care a lot of metrics and numbers. I just want to know which company is better to work for in the long run.
My second question is, if I can still back out of the offer with Walgreens. I accepted the offer online and did my drug screening. I have not signed W2 or anything else with them. And if I back out now, will I be black listed with Walgreens forever?

Thank you so much!
 
Last edited:
Yes you will be blacklisted. Walmart is better but who knows how long they will stay in the pharmacy business? Walgreens is more stable. So keep that in mind when you make your decision. There are only 3 big chains left so you really don't want to be blacklisted from one if you need a job a few years from now.
 
neither is better, CVS is the best!
but seriously congrats on your offers. personally i would take the full time floating if they guarantee your hours. what exactly is the "full time" float hours for WG??
unless WM part time give benefits... I would go with full time with benefits.
 
Yes you will be blacklisted. Walmart is better but who knows how long they will stay in the pharmacy business? Walgreens is more stable. So keep that in mind when you make your decision.

I think you will be black listed by the current WG DM there, but dont they change new DM everyy 2 years anyway? once a new DM comes they dont remember these stuff
 
Well I think the choice is pretty clear since only one of them is offering guaranteed full-time.

Walmart gives more tech hours and lunch breaks but you have less autonomy, at least from my experience. When I did a rotation there pharmacists were calling the doctor to "clarify" use as directed sig on zpaks and refused to changed amox 500 tablets to capsules without a call to the doctor. I remember switching tabs to caps myself and the pharmacists acted like I made a fatal error and could have killed someone.

I'm not sure if it was just the pharmacists at that store or if it's because Walmart has such strict policies. But why would you want to work part-time? And I doubt that there's as much opportunity to float at Walmart vs a pharmacy chain because there's almost half the number of stores.
 
I didn't even notice the Walmart offer isn't even full time. No benefits? Why would you choose that over a full time job? Don't you want paid vacation, sick time, 401k, health/dental insurance??
 
Walgreens, full-time at least you don't have to worry about looking for hours. With Wal-Mart they will schedule you hours and extra shifts are being sent to you then you have to bid on them, no guarantee that you will get it. Your hours will be fluctuated, lots of hours during summer and big holiday and less in the winter. Did Wal-Mart offer part time salary (24 or 32 hours per week) or hourly. If salary then you will get guaranteed for those hours plus benefit, 401k, vacation. Hourly you get none of it. Eventually you will get offer better position when available depending on your market.
 
I really need advice please. I was looking for a job for 2 months and finally got an offer with Walgreens for salaried full time floating position. I accepted it but then I got an interview with Walmart and they want to offer me a job. I told Walmart that I have an offer and the DM said he will try to give me a competitive pay (3dollars more) but it's not guaranteed full time. Although he did say that there will be plenty of extra shifts that I could pick up.
My first question is which company is better to work at. Most said Walmart is better since they have more tech hrs and a lunch break. Walgreens is a little more stressful since they care a lot of metrics and numbers. I just want to know which company is better to work for in the long run.
My second question is, if I can still back out of the offer with Walgreens. I accepted the offer online and did my drug screening. I have not signed W2 or anything else with them. And if I back out now, will I be black listed with Walgreens forever?

Thank you so much!
Most people are miserable or leave their jobs because of their manager, not the company.

The schedule, pay, and benefits are important, but you will forget about those in 6 months once you get what you want.

Don't underestimate the impact your boss and company culture can have on your longevity and happiness.

What did you learn about each company, the manager, the culture?

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G891A using SDN mobile
 
Why would you interview with walmart if you already had a full time offer from Walgreens?

Walmart is a better place to work but here is a deal. There are barely any employers left in retail right now. So you can’t really afford to burn too many bridges. If you ditch Wag right now, you might be shutting your door on one employer which is too many nowadays.

Grind it out with Wag and see how it goes. I wouldn’t even think about leaving a full tine job right now unless working conditions are absolutely unbearable. Politely decline WM and it shouldn’t be a big deal as you haven’t accepted the job offer yet. And unless are are considering to be a manager, you can forget about getting 80 hours as walmart; unless fishing for last minute extra shifts is your thing.
 
Well I think the choice is pretty clear since only one of them is offering guaranteed full-time.

Walmart gives more tech hours and lunch breaks but you have less autonomy, at least from my experience. When I did a rotation there pharmacists were calling the doctor to "clarify" use as directed sig on zpaks and refused to changed amox 500 tablets to capsules without a call to the doctor. I remember switching tabs to caps myself and the pharmacists acted like I made a fatal error and could have killed someone.

I'm not sure if it was just the pharmacists at that store or if it's because Walmart has such strict policies. But why would you want to work part-time? And I doubt that there's as much opportunity to float at Walmart vs a pharmacy chain because there's almost half the number of stores.

If call on uad sig for zpak I would personally report you to board for being a *****.

I can assure you it’s not a walmart “strict” policy
 
I really need advice please. I was looking for a job for 2 months and finally got an offer with Walgreens for salaried full time floating position. I accepted it but then I got an interview with Walmart and they want to offer me a job. I told Walmart that I have an offer and the DM said he will try to give me a competitive pay (3dollars more) but it's not guaranteed full time. Although he did say that there will be plenty of extra shifts that I could pick up.
My first question is which company is better to work at. Most said Walmart is better since they have more tech hrs and a lunch break. Walgreens is a little more stressful since they care a lot of metrics and numbers. I just want to know which company is better to work for in the long run.
My second question is, if I can still back out of the offer with Walgreens. I accepted the offer online and did my drug screening. I have not signed W2 or anything else with them. And if I back out now, will I be black listed with Walgreens forever?

Thank you so much!
I was a pharmacy intern at Walmart and I can give you what it's like to work at Walmart
Pro:
1. 30 mins lunch
2. More tech hours
3. No-drive thru
4. Walmart Wellness Day (I think it's a waste of money and time)

Con:
1. Under Walmart policy, consultation required for every new prescription and every new refill prescription. This can be stupid when patients on the same medications for years and they hate to wait for it when they clearly know how to take it. Also, this can slow down your process especially when patients have multiple questions at the consultation
2. 30 mins lunch break sounds great but there always patients come in 1 min before you close down (this happens during weekend because on weekend there only 1 pharmacist) , therefore, you have to cut down your lunchtime while your techs still get full 30 mins lunch or tell patients to come back after lunch (this can be a **** show because patients wait 30 mins more to pick up or drop off their prescription). Even though you get lunch late for helping patients but you still have to open back at right time or they will call Walmart corporation to complaint. (Trust me, this is happening before and you want to avoid it).
3. Walmart is very strict especially controlled substance and you have to call doctors for every clarification (like tablets to capsules...this is ridiculous when I call a doctor and trust me it not a fun experience when a nurse calling you "stupid" and "useless") and patients will be mad at you of why it takes so long.
4. There are lots of CBL (online modules) for pharmacists to do. That's suck. Imagine trying to do those when you are busy. There's a specific deadline you need to be done.
5. Lots of patients come in and ask you about OTC or random questions and can cause distraction and slow you down. Compare to CVS or Walgreen, there are few or none. This is based on my experience
6. At my store, the average time to fill a prescription from 20-35 mins depends on how busy we are. This took way too long. There are so many steps that we need to follow. There are a couple of times when techs put wrong medications in the wrong bags (this step is waste of time)
7. There are less Walmart stores compare to Walgreen, therefore, the driving from one store to another store sucks and take too long.
8. Less stores = less hours = less money (it's simple). I saw this when a floating pharmacist has to drive an hour or 2 hours to work and the avg. hours are 28-34 per week.

For long run, if you need the money then choose Walgreen (full time guarantee). If you want work less then choose Walmart. Although you can pick up shift at Walmart but are you willing to drive 1-2 hrs every day. This can be depends where you live.

All of these based on my experience only
 
Last edited:
neither is better, CVS is the best!
but seriously congrats on your offers. personally i would take the full time floating if they guarantee your hours. what exactly is the "full time" float hours for WG??
unless WM part time give benefits... I would go with full time with benefits.

WG - Fulltime - 80 hrs, salaried so I can take more shift if available - they will be paying for gas mileage/hotel/food if I take a shift far away.
WM - salaried so will be offered full benefits, just the hrs are not guaranteed 80hrs every pay period.
 
Why would you interview with walmart if you already had a full time offer from Walgreens?

Walmart is a better place to work but here is a deal. There are barely any employers left in retail right now. So you can’t really afford to burn too many bridges. If you ditch Wag right now, you might be shutting your door on one employer which is too many nowadays.

Grind it out with Wag and see how it goes. I wouldn’t even think about leaving a full tine job right now unless working conditions are absolutely unbearable. Politely decline WM and it shouldn’t be a big deal as you haven’t accepted the job offer yet. And unless are are considering to be a manager, you can forget about getting 80 hours as walmart; unless fishing for last minute extra shifts is your thing.
Keeping the bridge open on a potential offer is a great idea.

If things don't work out with WG, knowing you already got the job at Walmart is a nice safety net.
 
Keeping the bridge open on a potential offer is a great idea.

If things don't work out with WG, knowing you already got the job at Walmart is a nice safety net.

I don't see how this is a good thing.

Walmart probably wants an answer within a couple of weeks, what kind of safety net is that?

If he already accepted a position with Walgreens, why even interview with Walmart? If he chooses Walmart after accepting Walgreens, he burns the bridge with Walgreens.

If he politely declines Walmart, they probably won't bother to interview him again in the future. They'll remember him as the person who wasted their time and will think he'll leave Walmart in a couple years too.
 
I don't see how this is a good thing.

Walmart probably wants an answer within a couple of weeks, what kind of safety net is that?

If he already accepted a position with Walgreens, why even interview with Walmart? If he chooses Walmart after accepting Walgreens, he burns the bridge with Walgreens.

If he politely declines Walmart, they probably won't bother to interview him again in the future. They'll remember him as the person who wasted their time and will think he'll leave Walmart in a couple years too.
I see it differently.

If someone wants me now, why wouldn't they want me later?

Good talent is hard to find.

But if they don't care about talent, and want just someone with a pulse..

Then I see where you're coming from.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G891A using SDN mobile
 
I see it differently.

If someone wants me now, why wouldn't they want me later?

Good talent is hard to find.

But if they don't care about talent, and want just someone with a pulse..

Then I see where you're coming from.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G891A using SDN mobile

Let's be honest it doesn't take much talent to be a retail Rph, they just want people with a pulse. For example, Walgreens took 12 years to notice that tech who worked as a pharmacist.

If you declined an offer, why would they waste their time again in a few years knowing that you don't stay at a company long?
 
Let's be honest it doesn't take much talent to be a retail Rph, they just want people with a pulse. For example, Walgreens took 12 years to notice that tech who worked as a pharmacist.

If you declined an offer, why would they waste their time again in a few years knowing that you don't stay at a company long?
That's where I disagree. There's a huge difference between a retail pharmacist who only chooses to verify prescriptions and one that manages a successful multi-million dollar healthcare business.

If you hire just a body, you get cynicism, poor leadership, high turnover, and lots of victim mindset.

Healthcare for 50,000 people goes down the drain from one poorly managed pharmacy

That's what many people are seeing.

I'm sorry you have such low regard for our profession.

The picture you paint is only one side of the story. Not all pharmacists are the same.



Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G891A using SDN mobile
 
I remember something back around 2015.
There was a CVS pharmacist who did everything moved herself to Target.

You guys know rest of the story......

This is a potential 6 and half dozen scenario. Nothing wrong with either choice as long as you constantly improve yourself and get out of retail before it is too late to leave.


Sent from my iPad using SDN
 
I really need advice please. I was looking for a job for 2 months and finally got an offer with Walgreens for salaried full time floating position. I accepted it but then I got an interview with Walmart and they want to offer me a job. I told Walmart that I have an offer and the DM said he will try to give me a competitive pay (3dollars more) but it's not guaranteed full time. Although he did say that there will be plenty of extra shifts that I could pick up. (both will be salaried so I would get full benefits)
My first question is which company is better to work at. Most said Walmart is better since they have more tech hrs and a lunch break. Walgreens is a little more stressful since they care a lot of metrics and numbers. I just want to know which company is better to work for in the long run.
My second question is, if I can still back out of the offer with Walgreens. I accepted the offer online and did my drug screening. I have not signed W2 or anything else with them. And if I back out now, will I be black listed with Walgreens forever?

Thank you so much!

I'm a WM manager, if you dont care about metrics and numbers I will NOT hire you. I hope to god you were all about meeting company objectives, metrics and goals during your interview. The minute we here that your hesitant or against metrics, candidate is gone. Either way you are getting the same thing. It's really a floater position based out of a store, and they CALL you salaried. You can count on travelling EVERYWHERE to get your full 80+ hours. they will base you at 56 or less to start. (every 2 weeks this is). And your hourly rate will be 10-15 bucks less than what mine was as a staff (when i was one). Welcome to the NEW retail pharmacy of flexible staffing.
 
I'm a WM manager, if you dont care about metrics and numbers I will NOT hire you. I hope to god you were all about meeting company objectives, metrics and goals during your interview. The minute we here that your hesitant or against metrics, candidate is gone. Either way you are getting the same thing. It's really a floater position based out of a store, and they CALL you salaried. You can count on travelling EVERYWHERE to get your full 80+ hours. they will base you at 56 or less to start. (every 2 weeks this is). And your hourly rate will be 10-15 bucks less than what mine was as a staff (when i was one). Welcome to the NEW retail pharmacy of flexible staffing.

My market is nothing like this....

Pick the leader you want to work for, not that job you want. Everything else will fall in place if you have some work ethic and want to.
 
...and refused to changed amox 500 tablets to capsules without a call to the doctor. I remember switching tabs to caps myself and the pharmacists acted like I made a fatal error and could have killed someone.

walgreens was doing the same switching ranitidine capsule and tablet and had to pay multimillion dollars in fine. Walmart doesn't have that kind of money in their pharmacy budget, so i'm sure the pharmacists acted like they know what they're doing.
 
My market is nothing like this....

Pick the leader you want to work for, not that job you want. Everything else will fall in place if you have some work ethic and want to.

no offense man, but what a pharmacist WANTS now a days means nothing. you take what you can.....the leftover scraps. times have changed. No matter where you are. And metrics are EVERYTHING to a manager. If you dont meet them, my boss and his boss.....etc. all pissed off. = fired. you have to deliver results or your gone. You cant just pick WHO or WHERE you want to work anymore.
 
That's where I disagree. There's a huge difference between a retail pharmacist who only chooses to verify prescriptions and one that manages a successful multi-million dollar healthcare business.

If you hire just a body, you get cynicism, poor leadership, high turnover, and lots of victim mindset.

Healthcare for 50,000 people goes down the drain from one poorly managed pharmacy

That's what many people are seeing.

I'm sorry you have such low regard for our profession.

The picture you paint is only one side of the story. Not all pharmacists are the same.



Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G891A using SDN mobile

Get with the times man, this is about money. bottom line. And which one pharmacist is managing a MULTI million dollar empire here? I made 73,000 on my P&L this last year. And it all came from CUTTING associate wages. lol. nearly 44% down from last year, jesus. Almost half my tech help gone, plus one staff cut from 80 to 45 hours....They ask you to manage a business, then give you crap to work with. Thats why no one wants to do it anymore. It's like me asking you to please fix my refrigerator by tomorrow or your fired, then i hand you a roll of duct tape and WD-40 and say good luck. lmao.
 
I mean yeah a typical pharmacy might generate 4 million a year in sales but what's the net profit with declining reimbursement, DIR fees, etc.

I turned down a WM offer when I first went with CVS, then I applied again to WM later so you will not necessarily be blacklisted
 
I agree that the healthcare landscape is more hostile than ever. The way to make money is completely different. And yes, you need to make money, period. No margin, no mission.

When I took over my pharmacy, it was in the red, hemorrhaging money after rent, leasing, and depreciation.

Took a few years, but I'm up $400k/year now. But every pharmacy is different. Location, demographics, etc.. Many pharmacists I know are at $1.5 million/year net.

I also agree that you have to spend money in order to make money. That's why this job is fun. The pharmacy is our business playground. We don't have to front a dime and get to see the fruit of our labor.

If you are down 45% net, it makes sense to cut hours. They're not asking for you to return the money lost, just allocating less resources.

And you still get to make six figure salaries.

But if you outpace demands and budgets, you get to hire and build your team how you want. Business on paper doesn't always match up with real time demands, and that's where we can forecast if we know our business well enough.

I overspent 53 hours in January, and my supervisor didn't say a word to me. Pure bliss
 
None taken. The candidate has a choice of leaders wags and Wm. Should factor that into the equation of where they want to work. If you choose to work for a poor leader simply for money, you made that choice and what comes with it.

You make WM sound like a nightmare sometimes and it’s not. Any chain pharmacist would line up for what we get. Overlap and a tech budget over 200hrs

I get it that the market is not in favor of rphs, but position yourself as a strong player and get the best you can.
 
I agree that generally Walmart is not that bad compared to CVS or Walgreens. Bad stores are more likely to have openings since no one wants to work there though and there are fewer stores so fewer potential jobs.
 
Top