WAMC - lowish GPA, c/o 2028/2029

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.
Where else did you apply? You look good on paper but where you applied makes all the difference.
 
Your resume is very impressive.
The one thing I'm curious about-- if you wrote your PS about your journey to lab animal medicine, have you worked directly with a DACLAM? That may be worth doing, to really prove you understand what a lab animal vet does. It's definitely different than the role of a researcher
As for your sanity check-- you are not uncompetitive! If you look through the successful applicants threads, you will find students with far less on their resumes than you who got in. I would hold out hope if I were you!
 
Where else did you apply? You look good on paper but where you applied makes all the difference.
Minnesota, Illinois (I was expecting a rejection here), Missouri, Washington (expecting a rejection haha).
 
Your resume is very impressive.
The one thing I'm curious about-- if you wrote your PS about your journey to lab animal medicine, have you worked directly with a DACLAM? That may be worth doing, to really prove you understand what a lab animal vet does. It's definitely different than the role of a researcher
As for your sanity check-- you are not uncompetitive! If you look through the successful applicants threads, you will find students with far less on their resumes than you who got in. I would hold out hope if I were you!
Through my clinical research job I have worked with DACLAMs both directly (shadowing) and indirectly (my lab has several animal colonies, we worked with lab animal through that). I elaborated on it more in my PS than here. You are totally right about the difference. Thank you!
 
Top