I can sort of make out and understand the underlying mechanisms of how thiamine deficiency can present in 3 different ways (WK syndrome, Dry beri-beri, and Wet beri-beri). And from FA, thiamine deficiency is associated with two groups of people, those who are alcoholics and those who are malnourished.
Is it correct to say that when due to Alcoholism, the result is WK syndrome (without the beri-beri stuff). And when due to being malnourished, the result is beri-beri: In the initial stages, it starts as dry beri beri, which can then progress to wet beri beri if not treated?
Is this correct, or an oversimplification?
It just irritates me how deficiency of the same vitamin can lead to two different presentations, depending on whether or not alcoholism was involved. I'm sure there is more to the story going on!
Is it correct to say that when due to Alcoholism, the result is WK syndrome (without the beri-beri stuff). And when due to being malnourished, the result is beri-beri: In the initial stages, it starts as dry beri beri, which can then progress to wet beri beri if not treated?
Is this correct, or an oversimplification?
It just irritates me how deficiency of the same vitamin can lead to two different presentations, depending on whether or not alcoholism was involved. I'm sure there is more to the story going on!