- Joined
- Apr 21, 2004
- Messages
- 131
- Reaction score
- 1
What are the risks involved in light IV sedation and how do I minimize these risks? Can I undergo a light IV sedation without an anesthesiologist present? Is a CRNA sufficient?
Gator05 said:UT, is supplemental O2 really necessary? We were taught the theory of using the pulse-ox as a rough estimator of ventilation, ie a decrease in ventilation will be evident on Pulse-ox earlier if only RA is used versus supplemental O2.
Now, if the patient has confounding medical conditions, all bets are off and O2 will probably help more than hurt.
Anything I'm missing, or is this merely a difference in styles?
coffeeluver said:what are GI nurses?
Gator05 said:If the patient wasn't on supplemental oxygen, you'd have a better chance at noticing cessation of ventilation.
EMRaiden said:I understand gator05's point regarding the problem with supplemental O2 and concerns about missing something. One solution is the use of ETCO2 monitoring which will pick up changes in ventilation much more quickly.
coffeeluver said:So most Anesthesiologists will provide supplemental O2 with IV sedation? What about CRNAs? I'm still not sure if supplemental O2 should be used, I'll wait until you guys come up with a conclusion. So if a patient is young and in relatively good health, then IV sedation should be pretty safe?
Why is epinephrine mixed in with local anesthesia? I've read that some people have had a bad reaction to the epinephrine which resulted in tachycardia and increased blood pressure. Is there a test beforehand to know if the patient will have a bad reaction to epinephrine? Thanks.
Tenesma said:supplemental O2 - it is NOT a good idea to use desaturation as a monitor for lack of ventilation!!!!
The whole point of conscious sedation is to monitor the patient sufficiently so as to know whether the patient has ceased to breathe or maybe is obstructing.... Supplemental O2 is a MUST as it provides you a lot more reserve should the patient lose their airway.
Things that can assist with monitoring ventilation: EtCO2 (yes, even with a nasal cannula - while the number will be highly inaccurate, the presence of a regular tracing will be reassuring of air movement), watching the chest move, interacting with the patient (ie: if they are unresponsive not a good thing), placing a mirror in front of their nose/mouth for condensation... etc... the list goes on.
This all goes to show that conscious sedation should be administered by somebody whose only focus is to monitor the patient and the patient's airway.
coffeeluver said:Is it safe if a regular RN administer Versed under the supervision of a physician?
jwk said:Depends. I think a lot of areas use a little Versed for mild sedation - a couple mg or so.
Where the trouble can start is when more than that is given in a short period of time, and/or combining it with other drugs, such as Fentanyl or Demerol.
Make sure if there is an RN doing sedation that they have been trained appropriately, and that they are ONLY doing the sedation and monitorin, not participating in the procedure itself. Under NO CIRCUMSTANCES should an RN be giving propofol (Diprivan) for sedation for a procedure, regardless of what the GI docs and nurses associations may say.
bestiller said:First of all, whoever is saying that an RN cannot administer Versed is misinformed and I suspect, has never been a nurse or physician. Everyone knows(medical personnel) that ICU nurses use Versed daily as well as other benzodiazepines such as Valium, Ativan.....Whoever is posting.....have you ever taken care of an ICU patient? What are your qualifications and medical background? Are you a student? If so, get yourself in an extern program so that you can have patient care experience for when you graduate. Taking care of ICU patients and or ER patients is invaluable and a great advantage for medical school or nurse anesthesia school. Propofol is in a different class and should only be independently administered by anesthesiologists or nurse anesthetists.
Make sure also, that if an AA is doing the sedation that there is an MD anesthesiologist also present/immediately available. Under no circumstances should an RN being administering propofol and under no circumstances should an AA be administering propofol w/o an MDA present, as they are not legally permitted or trained/qualified to do so.
jwk said:No one said anything about RN's not giving Versed. My comment was that if the RN is giving sedation for the procedure (much different than giving a couple mg of Versed as a pre-med for surgery) that they should be trained appropriately and their sole responsbility during the procedure should be administering the sedation and monitoring the patient, not assisting with the procedure itself.
Your comments about AA's are incorrect and intended to flame AA's as you have in other threads. Why don't we leave that topic elsewhere and stick to the topic at hand?
QuinnNSU said:jwk-
Why do you feel that other specialties shouldnt' use Diprivan? I use it in the ED all the time for procedures (shoulder/hip reductions, fracture reductions, etc). I am trying all different techniques and find Diprivan or Etomidate to be my favorite forms of conscious sedation (I do use Versed/Fentanyl at times). I know some hospitals will not allow non anesthesiologists to use Diprivan or Etomidate for procdures, but ours does (tertiary care hospital). Of course there are inherent risks in all conscious sedation procedures, but what is it about Diprivan that you are afraid of non anesthesia/CRNA care providers using it for?
Thanks
Q, DO
jwk said:It's really a different animal. It's very easy to give too much and move from conscious sedation to deep sedation with a loss of airway reflexes. The cavalier attitudes about propofol make it that much more of a problem. Propofol, by itself, is not a good conscious sedation drug for a procedure since it offers no analgesic properties. If you give enough to render your patient unconscious, then you've created a much larger potential problem. If you combine it with Versed and/or Fentanyl, as many anesthesia providers do, then you have a problem as well. You've moved past "conscious sedation" into general anesthesia. Hence the warning from propofol manufacturers since it was introduced in the 80's - it's intended for anesthesia providers.
There was a similar problem when Versed was reduced. I can't tell you how many codes I went to in endoscopy labs and ER for respiratory arrests caused by Versed. Everyone wanted to slam in 10mg, just like Valium, then were surprised when the patient quit breathing.
QuinnNSU said:I definately can understand your point. Believe you me, I'm a pretty conservative conscious sedator. Usually my attendings will manage airway for me but while I'm doing hte procedure i'm always just trying to see what's going on ABC-wise.
I DO like diprivan for procedures but find Etomidate (.15/kg) to be better to my taste, although on one patient who needed a hip reduction, she had mm spasms which kind of defeated the purpose. Went to Versed/Fent and it worked great.
Q, DO
chillindrdude said:propofol/fentanyl
versed/fentanyl
etomidate...
you know...any one have used Ketamine and Versed?
i used it with great success in peds patients while having their fractures reduced in the ER.
i feel that ketamine is an underused medication. supports cardiovascular parameters, great for hypovolemic patients. provides analgesia, anesthesia, and amnesia. minimal loss of airway reflexes. i think the bad rap of ketamine comes from the its association with PCP...but i've never observed anyone spazzing out emerging from ketamine administration. i figure, as long as the patient is relatively healthy, just keep environmental stimulus to a minimum during emergence and perhap 1 or 2 of versed to smooth things out.
what do you all think?
jwk said:So you're giving sedation and your attending is managing the airway. Are you doing the procedure as well? I'm just curious who is monitoring the patient.
Hadn't thought much about etomidate as a sedation agent. I only use it for induction, and it's not really my favorite drug.