What can you do as a physician that other professions cannot

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.
Serious answers please! Like if you were to get asked this in an interview, what would you say?
 
Autonomy, academic medicine, surgery, bragging rights.
 
One thing that appeals to me, is the chance in medical school to dabble in all of the fields of medicine and find the perfect niche for you.
 
be surgeon general
 
One thing that appeals to me, is the chance in medical school to dabble in all of the fields of medicine and find the perfect niche for you.
Nurses, Researchers and others can do that too... Even engineers can
 
There is very little in life that is exclusive to one group. There will be overlap of virtually any activity you can name. Someone else will be capable of doing it, unless you start narrowing the definition to a smaller and smaller point.

Perform surgeries? Well, I know someone who does liver transplants in mice. Her suturing skills would put many surgeons to shame, since she has to anastamose vessels that are little thicker than guitar strings.

Now, if you specify "perform complex surgeries on humans as the sole operator," you might get into MD/DO only territory, maybe. But then, I don't know any surgeons that operate solo, and some of them have RNs and PAs a first assistants, participating in major portions of the procedure.
 
How can you answer this so that no other profession can do what a physician can? Including researchers, nurses, medical techs or anyone else in healthcare.

Thanks!
The opportunity to purchase a malpractice policy that will compensate patients for up to tens of millions of dollars if one screws up.

Disclaimer: I have no idea what the policy limits are for an OD, PT, DPM, DVM, PharmD, RN, or NP, but one never hears of huge claims against them.
 
Totally the same thing.

The structures are ever so much smaller, and the patient has just a scant few mL of blood in their entire body, so an EBL of 1 mL represents half their blood volume. Microsurgical instruments and loupes are absolute necessities, as are very, very steady hands.

If you don't see that this is surgery, and more technically challenging than your average lap appy, I can't help you.

The point is that virtually any single thing you can imagine that a doctor does is replicated elsewhere. The example that I used, the performance of a difficult surgical procedure requiring advanced training and exceptional fine motor skills, is something that can be experienced in other professions. If someone just really loved to operate, to apply their fascination with anatomy and surgical skills, but didn't want to do any of the rest of the work of being a doctor, my friend's lab job would let them do that.

There is no other profession that exactly does everything that a physician does. But that wasn't the question being posed. What was asked was whether there was any single thing doctors do that is entirely unique to the profession, and not done outside it. If you are going to break down being a doctor into a series of tasks and microexperiences, then you can find overlap in other professions. If you then complain that at some point the comparison breaks down, well, yes, obviously.

I almost had an answer for something that physicians do which no other profession does: Take ultimate and total responsibility for the health of their patients... Once, that would have been a true statement, and in many places it still is. But consider states which allow nurse practitioners to practice independently of physician oversight. In those places, the NP has taken on that level of responsibility, since there is no one to whom to pass the buck. (I hope that we don't have to go off on a tangent of whether that is the way it should be... I don't think many here would argue that it is in the patients' best interests. Or the nurses' for that matter!)
 
The structures are ever so much smaller, and the patient has just a scant few mL of blood in their entire body, so an EBL of 1 mL represents half their blood volume. Microsurgical instruments and loupes are absolute necessities, as are very, very steady hands.

If you don't see that this is surgery, and more technically challenging than your average lap appy, I can't help you.

The point is that virtually any single thing you can imagine that a doctor does is replicated elsewhere. The example that I used, the performance of a difficult surgical procedure requiring advanced training and exceptional fine motor skills, is something that can be experienced in other professions. If someone just really loved to operate, to apply their fascination with anatomy and surgical skills, but didn't want to do any of the rest of the work of being a doctor, my friend's lab job would let them do that.

There is no other profession that exactly does everything that a physician does. But that wasn't the question being posed. What was asked was whether there was any single thing doctors do that is entirely unique to the profession, and not done outside it. If you are going to break down being a doctor into a series of tasks and microexperiences, then you can find overlap in other professions. If you then complain that at some point the comparison breaks down, well, yes, obviously.

I almost had an answer for something that physicians do which no other profession does: Take ultimate and total responsibility for the health of their patients... Once, that would have been a true statement, and in many places it still is. But consider states which allow nurse practitioners to practice independently of physician oversight. In those places, the NP has taken on that level of responsibility, since there is no one to whom to pass the buck. (I hope that we don't have to go off on a tangent of whether that is the way it should be... I don't think many here would argue that it is in the patients' best interests. Or the nurses' for that matter!)

OP's question was not "what can an undergrad do that physicians can also do?" the question was "what can physicians do that nobody else can do?" Last time I checked nobody is going to allow your friend to transplant a human liver.

But I have heard mice are a very litigious, so props to your friend for risking so much.
 
Last edited:
be surgeon general

I'm not sure that there is a formal requirement that the person holding that office possess any specific list of qualifications. It is a political appointment. Presumably, there would be an outcry if it were handed to a layperson or to some other nonphysician, but I can't find any evidence that they would be technically barred from the position.

Make 200k a year

Nah, there are nurses in upper administration at the hospital system that I just left who are pulling that. RNs, not NPs. You just have to be an executive, not an actual caregiver. I am an experienced, duly certified operating room nurse with pediatric and CVOR experience. If I picked up a couple more state licenses, I could do travel assignments for $60+/hr, $90+/hr OT, with guaranteed 48-60 hour work weeks. My inbox is full of recruiters trying to lure me to such gigs. If I killed myself, working four 12 week assignments at 60 hours per week, I could just hit that figure. ($4200 wk net x 48 = 200k net plus 4 weeks vacation a year and paid travel / accommodation)

There are obviously a lot of reasons that I choose not to do this, but it is theoretically possible, even for someone with just an RN.

Call themselves 'doctor' with a serious face :whistle:

Dentists and podiatrists can certainly do this.

Be a physician

Winner winner chicken dinner. Maybe the one thing that can't be done by anyone else is to put it all together into the total package.

I'm really fascinated by the question, and curious if anyone will come up with something else.
 
OP's question was not "what can an undergrad do that physicians can also do?" the question was "what can physicians do that nobody else can do?" Last time I checked nobody is going to allow your friend to transplant a human liver.

But I have heard mice are a very litigious, so props to your friend for risking so much.

Your tone is unbecoming.

I'm taking the question seriously. If you had a point to make, delivering it up without the side order of sarcasm would probably convey it a little better.
 
I'm taking the question seriously.

Too seriously.

I'm not sure that there is a formal requirement that the person holding that office possess any specific list of qualifications. It is a political appointment. Presumably, there would be an outcry if it were handed to a layperson or to some other nonphysician, but I can't find any evidence that they would be technically barred from the position.

The Surgeon General of the Army is a nurse (thanks Obama).
 
Top