

Thanks for the info about lab/clinical research. It seems like clinical research is generally regarded as less powerful as an EC than research in a lab. Is this true?
i think it would... what they generally care about is probably the intellectual qualities/skills gained in a research role, not actually the research itself... if you're meaningfully contributing to academia in an original way that's gotta count.Extending the OP's question: does research in bioethics/medical humanities/history of medicine qualify as research for the purposes of medical adcoms? I know I personally have no interest in lab/hard science research, but I am interested in and spent my undergraduate doing medical humanities work (research assistantship, senior thesis, summer research etc.) and have always wondered whether that would count for anything.
I also have a question:
When applying for a position, what should you give as your reason for wanting to do research?
I'd assume they wouldn't want to hear "to improve chances of getting into medical school."
I also have a question:
When applying for a position, what should you give as your reason for wanting to do research?
I'd assume they wouldn't want to hear "to improve chances of getting into medical school."
If you are just collecting data and handing it to a coordinating center for analysis, then "yes", it isn't as highly regarded as bench research because it isn't really research, it is more like clinical care except that you are observing subjects, not patients (subjects can be patients but don't confuse clinical research with clinical care).
If you were working with an investigator on retrospective chart review studies or small projects where you come up with the hypothesis, have some input in how the study is designed and conducted, and do some of the analysis yourself (even if it is only descriptive stats) then that sort of clinical research is as good or better than bench reserach. The point is, you should have some participation in the scientific method. Doing data collection on a clinical trial (where the sponsor provides you with eveything) is the clinical equivalent to washing labware.
Thanks for the info about lab/clinical research. It seems like clinical research is generally regarded as less powerful as an EC than research in a lab. Is this true?
How about research in the math or engineering department that doesn't have any sort of lab work?
I also have a question:
When applying for a position, what should you give as your reason for wanting to do research?
I'd assume they wouldn't want to hear "to improve chances of getting into medical school."
you should say you are interested in the topic and want to extend your knowledge of the particular field.