•••quote:•••Originally posted by Papa Smurf:
• •••quote:•••Originally posted by spicoli:
•The point that I am trying to make is this: if you and another applicant had stats that were equally admirable, but the other applicant had to work harder because of a disadvantage that was inherited, are you truly equal?•••••If two people had the same exact GPA, MCAT, extracurriculars, LOR's etc, and one was well off while the other was disadvantaged growing up, do you automatically accept the disadvantaged applicant? I mean, there's a lot of subjectivity involved there, isn't there? Who's to say that I, as someone who was very fortunate growing up, wouldn't have been able to overcome the same obstacles if they were presented to me? Aren't those who weren't disadvantaged being discriminated against in some fashion with this kind of reasoning? I mean, I can only overcome what's placed in front of me. I'm not gonna move from the suburbs to the ghetto and try and prove that I can overcome to the same extent that others have. IMHO, those who've had a good life thanks to their parents shouldn't be punished for it anymore than those who've had a bad life for circumstances beyond their control.•••••using reverse psychology...I see.....look, who is to say that a person with a 43 MCAT and 4.0 GPA will become a better doctor than a 20s MCAT and average GPA person....please kid!!! for those of you who have read my posts since day one, you all know I don't have the high MCAT scores or high GPA...but I doubt that I will drop out of medical school...I doubt that if I take a class with all the 43 MCAT people and 4.0 GPA students, I will fail the course. Here is something my cousin told me when I started thinking about medical school,
"THE HARDEST THING ABOUT MEDICAL SCHOOL....IS GETTING IN!!!!" let's just stay away from the diadvantaged/AA topic, we'll continue going in circles here...some people agree, some people don't, some people start getting hurt, etc.