Originally posted by brandonite:
•As far as I can tell, it means you learn by examining cases. So, instead of giving a lecture about the kidneys, they might present a patient (real or hypothetical) with some kind of kidney problem, and it was up to you to diagnose it.
It supposedly makes the learning more 'real' to students, and makes it seem more relavent. I think it's generally a good idea, though I do wonder about it's impact on the USMLE's... If you are doing all this PBL, aren't you neglecting the kind of things you need to know for the USMLE's? Perhaps I'm looking too far down the road.
Hope that helps.•••
Actually, the whole "PBL in med school" concept was started by my McMaster Universtiy in Canada. There, it's totally PBL. everything is done in a tutorial group of 8 people. No written exams, no marks. Instead, they get personal evaluations which include evaluations of their class work, clinical skills, everything.
I think this is good since it evaluates the student's total competence as a physician instead of just how smart s/he is. And as far as I know, they do pass the board exams.