- Joined
- Jan 24, 2015
- Messages
- 189
- Reaction score
- 166
Should be an interesting discussion
Should be an interesting discussion
Points of disagreement are irrelevant. Resistance is futile. You too will be assimilated into the SDN collective.
If you go Carib, you can kiss becoming a doctor goodbye. It's not like there is a 0% chance of success. I think the risks should be emphasized, but I don't like how SDN has this absolute hive mentality on no one ever finding success if they go Carib.
What is a drop of rain, compared to the storm? What is a thought, compared to a mind? Our unity is full of wonder, which your tiny individualism cannot even conceive.
May his Bat'leth be forever sharp and Sto-vo-kor welcome him.Long ago, a storm was heading for the city of Quin'lat. Everyone took protection within the walls except one man who remained outside. I went to him and asked what he was doing. "I am not afraid," the man said. "I will not hide my face behind stone and mortar. I will stand before the wind and make it respect me." The next day, the storm came, and the man was killed. Do not stand before the wind.
Kahless the Unforgetable
The SDN hive mind got me into medical school. I have no major problems.
r/premed hates us for this lolI'm starting to notice how generally negative and unhelpful this hive mind can be, but I think there are a few good posters who try to help if you can filter through the trash.
I want you to tell me the same thing once you're practicing.I don't think Obamacare is ruining medicine.
I'm practicing. I'm good with it.I want you to tell me the same thing once you're practicing.
Aren't you also an academic physician? Just curious- I find almost every physician I know that supports it is in academic medicine, while the most loud detractors are those in private practice.I'm practicing. I'm good with it.
I have been in both private and public practice.Aren't you also an academic physician? Just curious- I find almost every physician I know that supports it is in academic medicine, while the most loud detractors are those in private practice.
Personally I actually don't think it's that bad, but there are a lot of things about it I don't like. Worst law ever? No. Bad law? Yes. The access issues, limitations on physician-owned hospitals, and EMR requirements are just too much for me to actually believe it's a good law overall. It seems as if it was designed from the ground up to result in vertical integration of physicians into large hospital-owned practices or multi specialty groups, and to kill private practice and small groups.
The idea that, when one DO adcom member speaks, they are speaking for every single MD adcom member in all of the ~150 MD med schools in the country.The idea that, when 1 adcom member speaks, they are speaking for every single adcom member in all of the ~150 med schools in the country.
The idea that SDN should be avoided because it leads to neurosis in premeds. SDN doesn't make you neurotic- you were neurotic to begin with. If you can look at things objectively, rather than like some overly sensitive child, SDN can provide you with a wealth of information about medical school and the practice of medicine, from the premed to the attending level.
I want you to tell me the same thing once you're practicing.
I don't think Obamacare is ruining medicine.
Aren't you also an academic physician? Just curious- I find almost every physician I know that supports it is in academic medicine, while the most loud detractors are those in private practice.
Personally I actually don't think it's that bad, but there are a lot of things about it I don't like. Worst law ever? No. Bad law? Yes. The access issues, limitations on physician-owned hospitals, and EMR requirements are just too much for me to actually believe it's a good law overall. It seems as if it was designed from the ground up to result in vertical integration of physicians into large hospital-owned practices or multi specialty groups, and to kill private practice and small groups.
Honestly this is a bit of an oversimplification of what the argument should be.
AAAAAAAAND there goes the thread.
That was my thread. And it wasn't because of the political motivations behind the ACA- it was because of what it has done to access for the people who actually need it. Read the thread, it's got some pretty good arguments for why the law is bad no matter white side of the fence you're on.Well there was a very active thread on hear a couple week ago titled "Obamacare is a Complete Failure" so I am not so sure that I am oversimplifying the "hive mind" of SDN.
That was my thread. And it wasn't because of the political motivations behind the ACA- it was because of what it has done to access for the people who actually need it. Read the thread, it's got some pretty good arguments for why the law is bad no matter white side of the fence you're on.
To #1 - It may not matter after you've been admitted to medical school, and you can get into US MD school from virtually any US college. But for those in high school, the odds of getting into medical school are not in your favor, and if you don't, your major, degree and alma mater do matter.
- It doesn't matter where you go for undergrad or what you major in -
- It doesn't matter what US MD school you go to.
To #2 - While it's true that all accredited US MD schools teach the same material, some simply have substantially better resources than others: physical facilities, research opportunities, teachers, reputations for turning out fine clinicians, and renowned faculty members to help graduates secure top residencies in their desired specialties. True, the best graduates from almost any US MD school can 'get there from here', but again, the odds.
Well there was a very active thread on hear a couple week ago titled "Obamacare is a Complete Failure" so I am not so sure that I am oversimplifying the "hive mind" of SDN.
http://nypost.com/2014/03/19/nations-elite-cancer-hospitals-off-limits-under-obamacare/I read the thread when it was active. I personally did not find it convincing, but to each his own.
I guess we just aren't seeing the negatives as much in CA.http://nypost.com/2014/03/19/nations-elite-cancer-hospitals-off-limits-under-obamacare/
http://www.washingtonpost.com/natio...c84e20-4bb4-11e3-ac54-aa84301ced81_story.html
http://www.usnews.com/news/articles/2014/10/29/obamacare-hasnt-propelled-mental-health-treatment
http://money.cnn.com/2014/03/19/news/economy/obamacare-doctors/
I can literally do this for days. Many people in the area around my medical school are suffering the ill effects of the law- they are only covered by community hospitals and have extremely narrow provider networks, basically putting them in a situation where they may as well not have coverage at all, except they're paying decent sums of money for that lack of coverage. Most of the exchange plans don't cover the only pediatric hospital in the state, leaving patients with extremely sick children that have cancer or rare diagnoses with no option but to go to community hospitals that are ill-equipped to handle their treatment. A lot of doctors can't even get on insurance panels- the insurance companies are refusing to take new physicians, because adding physicians means more access and thus more claims- so they're forced to practice without accepting many patients' insurance, which hurts patients and their bottom line.
It's a bad law that did nothing but enrich the AHA, pharmaceutical companies, EMR developers, and the insurance companies at the expense of patients and physicians. I'm okay with reform, but not this reform.
With an attitude like that, you'll be a terrible physician and probably actually physically turn into Hitler. /threadI'm waiting for someone to compare something to naziism and make this thread complete.
With an attitude like that, you'll be a terrible physician and probably actually physically turn into Hitler. /thread
The idea that, when one DO adcom member speaks, they are speaking for every single MD adcom member in all of the ~150 MD med schools in the country.
It shouldn't be championed as the Equalizer, the great assessment of academic ability and GPA validity, like it constantly is.
I want you to tell me the same thing once you're practicing.
The idea that, when 1 adcom member speaks, they are speaking for every single adcom member in all of the ~150 med schools in the country.
People being afraid to stick up for what they believe in, particularly when it's something that isn't necessarily "politically correct" or when it's the minority opinion. Grow some balls - this is the internet.
I don't know about futile, but I could see where these people are coming from... The benefits (in regard to getting accepted to med school) probably diminish significantly after a year. (I.e. 2 years of being a scribe barely looks better than 1, and you could've spent the 2nd year doing something else that looks better). But I have no idea, purely speculation.The consensus here seems to be that scribing is futile for >1 year. Get in, get your LOR, learn a little bit about physician lifestyle, get out. You're just a tool for the doctor.
How awfully wrong this is.
I have come to the realization that the way medicine operates is more like a business and is not an entitlement for the betterment of society.I disagree with the frequent piling on pre-meds for asking about physician compensation. I find it absurd that many of my peers think of medicine as something more than a job, and that deciding to become a physician partly due to the compensation means they won't be good physicians.