D
deleted6669
See my post #23 above. PAs have been doing diagnostic caths at Duke for almost 20 years.Mount Sinai Hospital in NYC has NPs doing diagnostic caths and I believe one does PCI.
See my post #23 above. PAs have been doing diagnostic caths at Duke for almost 20 years.Mount Sinai Hospital in NYC has NPs doing diagnostic caths and I believe one does PCI.
Then the salaries haven't dropped enough.
Also there are still enough positions available in the cities if people are staying there. Eventually, there will be no more job slots in cities and people who graduate from those type of schools will have to go rural.
I don't think you understand the business model of medicine... This is literally impossible.
Well, no ****. If you have mommy and daddy looking that you don't mess up, of course you'll do as well as the fellow doing it alone.ORLANDO, Fla. -- A study by Duke University Medical Center researchers has shown that
physician assistants, with proper training can successfully perform cardiac catheterizations.
"Under the careful supervision of experienced attending cardiologists, trained physician
assistants can perform diagnostic cardiac catheterization, including coronary angiography, with
procedural times and complication rates similar to those of cardiology fellows. This is the first
large study that demonstrates that this is a safe practice," said Dr. Richard Krasuski, a Duke
cardiology fellow who led the study which was presented Wednesday at the 50th Annual
Scientific Session of the American College of Cardiology.
...
The Duke study compared 929 diagnostic cardiac catheterizations performed by PAs with
supervision by a cardiologist to 4,521 catheterizations performed by cardiology fellows.
Cardiology fellows are physicians receiving three to four years of advanced training in cardiology
after completing an internal medicine residency.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12772231
See my post #23 above. PAs have been doing diagnostic caths at Duke for almost 20 years.
How so? This is my understanding. Correct me if I am wrong.
You graduate. You either get hired by a hospital, clinic or you set up your own shop. All the positions are full at the hospitals in town and clinics. Tons of private practices, enough for the population. So you have to go rural.
A better option is to make the NPs go out there seeing as that was their whole sales pitch for getting autonomy, but no they have their own derm "residencies"
At that point you will honestly have people just not going into medicine instead of being funneled into these rural areas
some of us work rural..... I have 3 rural jobs. 2 solo and 1 double coverage.At that point you will honestly have people just not going into medicine instead of being funneled into these rural areas. A better option is to make the NPs go out there seeing as that was their whole sales pitch for getting autonomy, but no they have their own derm "residencies"
wow!NPs and PAs at Mount Sinai also do diagnostic cerebral angiograms.
It seems that the most virulent anti-midlevel attitudes in these forums are coming from pre-meds and medical students. And pre-clinical medical students at that.
Mount Sinai Hospital in NYC has NPs doing diagnostic caths and I believe one does PCI.
Screw the PAs. Even the PA students at my med school are annoying.
I used to teach the MCAT and I ended up seeing the most annoying and condescending student in my class in my schools PA program. N=1. We still haven't talked. She was basically obsessed with being a dermatologist or nothing. Short story I guess. I like most PAs.
I used to teach the MCAT and I ended up seeing the most annoying and condescending student in my class in my schools PA program. N=1. We still haven't talked. She was basically obsessed with being a dermatologist or nothing. Short story I guess. I like most PAs.
See my post #23 above. PAs have been doing diagnostic caths at Duke for almost 20 years.
But now I kinda wonder... A PA who's been doing nothing but diagnostic angios for the last 10 years is probably a lot better than a fresh fellow who was an internal medicine resident 3 months prior.
http://www.modernhealthcare.com/article/20161213/NEWS/161219974 saw someone posted this on reddit today. Looks like NPs get their scope expanded except for CRNAs in the VA system if i'm reading it right.
I see this logic used too often in these discussions as if all midlevels are created with years of experience. The correct comparison is would a fresh faced PA be as good as a fresh fellow and would a PA who has been doing angios for 10 years be as good as a cardiologist who has been doing angios for 10 years? Obviously the MD/DO is the better option in either scenario.
I have no desire to push for equal pay for PAs and physicians in the same specialty. I think we both need to make a good income, but it's fair that a residency trained/boarded EM doc will always make more money than I do.Our best option is the fact that midlevels (NPs especially) want to get paid the same. They are actively pushing this in state legislatures across the country, and have already passed a law in Oregon. Once the incentive to hire them is gone, they will be too. I don't really have a huge problem with the work/training that most PAs do/get, but NPs are another story
Our hospital was a stroke center and a nuero NP came down from the neuro floor to the ED for every stroke activation.
rad onc needs to worry about computer encroachment
Uhhh, you don't need much to 'run' a stroke - either tPA or ride it out with some aspirin and hope the FNDs don't end up being too bad.
rad onc needs to worry about computer encroachment
Our best option is the fact that midlevels (NPs especially) want to get paid the same. They are actively pushing this in state legislatures across the country, and have already passed a law in Oregon. Once the incentive to hire them is gone, they will be too. I don't really have a huge problem with the work/training that most PAs do/get, but NPs are another story
Out of curiosity, what would happen 20-50 years down the road if rad onc becomes phased out due to new therapies in cancer treatment? Would interventional radiology take them in under a 2-3 year transitional fellowship?Rad Onc needs to worry about having hitched their wagon to a treatment modality rather than an organ/physiologic system.
Exactly. What CFO would hire an NP over a physician if they had to pay out the same salary?I've never understood the logical fallacy some of these people employ by thinking they deserve the same compensation as someone who was trained much more thoroughly than they were. Some of them seem to think that they've found an educational holy grail that allows them to get the same training in 6+ fewer years and the doctors are just too dumb to realize it.
Obviously I don't speak of most NPs but a few outspoken people in the nursing world think this way.
I've never understood the logical fallacy some of these people employ by thinking they deserve the same compensation as someone who was trained much more thoroughly than they were. Some of them seem to think that they've found an educational holy grail that allows them to get the same training in 6+ fewer years and the doctors are just too dumb to realize it.
Obviously I don't speak of most NPs but a few outspoken people in the nursing world think this way.
There is very little overlap. Not going to trim 2-3 years off of training.Out of curiosity, what would happen 20-50 years down the road if rad onc becomes phased out due to new therapies in cancer treatment? Would interventional radiology take them in under a 2-3 year transitional fellowship?
They argue that their outcomes are better than ours. They're not exactly a clever or logical bunch