JeffLebowski,
Just to clear up a few misconceptions you might have...
Most of my comments relating to YOUR particular response were to do with some of your comments regarding patients knowing what information might be important. Judging by your last post - I still don't think you grasped what I was trying to say about that.
To incompletely quote your response
"its frustrating when they elaborate spontaneously on totally unimportant stuff and get tight lipped and vague on important health complaints"
The point I was making was that a patient's idea of what is important information may not be YOUR idea of important information. It is THIS discrepancy which can be the most difficult hurdle in sound history taking because on the one hand you have to just ask the 'medical' questions and run your diagnostic sieve and all that side of things - but on the other hand you only have 15 mins or so to really grasp what the patients concerns are, what things are important to the patient so that when it comes to formulating a problem list, and an overall plan - it encapsulates these things. Without it, your plan will never be complete because the patients concerns are rarely 'hyponatremia' or 'ejection fraction 16%'. More often, they are more earthly, but no less important things like "when can i go home", "am i able to drive my car", "i need help with laundry because i get breathless.. who will help me?", "i cant walk anymore", "my husband died and i am really sad, and finding it difficult to get my motivation back". And if you really want to help them out, then you've got to somehow marry the two together. Well, I think so anyway.
I think I might have mentioned in another thread - that were not only there to correct someones sodium, or make sure they HbA1c is optimal, but to pay attention to more social aspects. Indeed, that is the very purpose of the social history - to place a patients medical problems in the context of their lives. Taking a holistic approach works certainly seems to work better in the long term - which is why I'd say there's been a general swing in conventional medicine to accomodate more of this in our practice.
As for my comment on getting irritated with patients. That was more directed at the first commentary on this thread about a fellow student feeling like "slapping their patients face". I still stand by all the comments I made in this respect... I think violent attitudes to patients are unjustfiable - and lack critical insight into why you form those responses in the first place.
I'd suggest you're perhaps a little quick to judge. Having not witnessed my behaviour, or attitudes during my training - saying that I'm immune to frustrations is an oversight. Perhaps you were feeling threatened by my comments? And felt the need to make some personal judgements in retaliation? If that's the case - then I apologise. Like i mentioned in my first post earlier - I'm not out to embarass anyone, just point out some things that they may or may not have thought about. I definitely don't know what you have or haven't considered - so offer very general comments in that regard.
The general intention of my post was "dont blame your patients". I didn't/wasnt question the legitimacy of voicing frustrations. But I think when it comes to suggestions such as "slap the patient", "lace them with laxatives" or "get tough, act indifferent", whether in jest, or for real - you are essentially dissolving yourself of any responsibility for a negative interaction between 2 people - and placing all the responsibility on the patient. In a place where they are the very reason you come to work - that seems counter intuitive to me. Hence the suggestion to find a new career (something less counter intuitive).
At the same time, I'm not advocating that you should always blame yourself, and yourself alone either. It's a fine balance.
I certainly never mentioned, at any point, that I am immune to frustration - or have not experienced a feeling of dissatisfaction after a less than ideal consultation with a patient. However, in the numerous times this HAS occurred - I have taken the chance to look at my own behaviour during the consultation, and I HAVE spoken to my seniors about the reasons why consultations don't always go to 'plan', and that's why I felt well within my rights to make any comment in the first place. I do take my advice most of the time. I drink sometimes though, enjoy a 'fry up' with my mates, and enjoy a cigar on occasions too, so I'm not perfect either.
Having been actively involved in mentoring, and peer groups with my younger colleagues both in and out of the medical world, in the sports world, the academic world, and the music world, for a pretty long time - I think i've learnt the value of sharing frustrations and negative experiences and coming up with practical solutions to problems we encounter. And I encourage more of the same!
Hope that clears things up.