- Joined
- Oct 30, 2003
- Messages
- 38
- Reaction score
- 0
At one of my interviews, I just came out and said, "How would my training be better at this highly renowned institution?"
The response I got: "Well, it's certainly better to be at a top five place than the number twenty." (whatever that means)
Now that interviews are over and ROL's are being determined and submitted, I'm just curious how the "name game" is factoring in for people. I for one place a high priority on academic integrity (and fellowship options) and consider it crucial to really be happy with my placement. But I'm finding my favorite programs are not necessarily those with the biggest "names" on my list. Anyone else in the same predicament?
The response I got: "Well, it's certainly better to be at a top five place than the number twenty." (whatever that means)
Now that interviews are over and ROL's are being determined and submitted, I'm just curious how the "name game" is factoring in for people. I for one place a high priority on academic integrity (and fellowship options) and consider it crucial to really be happy with my placement. But I'm finding my favorite programs are not necessarily those with the biggest "names" on my list. Anyone else in the same predicament?