- Joined
- May 27, 2009
- Messages
- 241
- Reaction score
- 2
Nope, actually a lot of MBA programs have no pre-reqs at all.just out of curiosity do you have to have a BS in business to be accepted in an MBA program
Nope, actually a lot of MBA programs have no pre-reqs at all.just out of curiosity do you have to have a BS in business to be accepted in an MBA program
Any suggestions?Nope, actually a lot of MBA programs have no pre-reqs at all.
Having an MBA without work experience is like doing a surgery without ever cutting a person open before. The people who benefit from an MBA are people who already have a job and want to move up in their field.
Yeah, I'd primarily be looking into public health jobs at that point. I think with the immunology route I'd focus on trying to land a research/teaching position at some school.are you looking for a job in research ? I think Ohio state has a PhD in medical chemistry/pharm.D. program but it only shaves a year off. cause I think its like 7 years long.
just wondering what type of jobs would PhD in epidemiology/ phar.D. get you? would it be like a public health gov. job?
just out of curiosity do you have to have a BS in business to be accepted in an MBA program
Just to specify a little more. You do have to have a BS or BA. However, it does not matter what the degree is in. If i recall Harvard does not even have a BBA program at all, and plenty of them go on to get their MBA.Nope, actually a lot of MBA programs have no pre-reqs at all.
They should have a person like this for the Post office. Like 30% of our work force can retire or can in the next year or two. Some of these guys have been working for 50+ years!!Get a job talking pharmacists into retiring or leaving the profession en masse.
Totally take the year and get a Masters, probably MPH. Good careers in Government and Health Services with an MPH
Well considering the Earth will be in ruins after December 21, 2012...much like a scene out of Mad Max Meets I am Legend...I will fall back on being a Mercenary.
In the case of this not happening, I will just be a Pharmacist.
And what might that be?Don't need one. I have a position waiting for me
Not even that, assuming the "pole shift" pundits are correct, and our magnetic field gets whacked up, we might end up incinerated from sea to shining sea.
If it's quick, I don't care
Naturally. Any belief that ancient people who didn't even have radio or television or electricity or running water or Taco Bell could predict the very day the world would press the giant red self-destruct button is preposterous and dumb.
Naturally. Any belief that ancient people who didn't even have radio or television or electricity or running water or Taco Bell could predict the very day the world would press the giant red self-destruct button is preposterous and dumb.
I like this metaphor for whats going to happen .To use a metaphor from the modern industrial world, on Winter Solstice A.D. 2012 it is as if the Giant Odometer of Humanity on Earth hits 100,000 miles and all the cycles big and small turn over to begin anew. The present world age will end and a new world age will begin.
It's actually much more complicated than that notion. The fact that the Mayans predicted a precise date of galactic alignment with the Earth, Sun and direct center of the Milky Way is rather impressive. Modern astronomy has proven that the mayans astronomical inquiries are very accurate, yet the reason behind these inquiries is still a mystery. Will the world face catastrophic events, nobody knows for sure...probably not. But, what will happen on that day only occurs every 25,000 years and was of great importance to such a "backwards, uncivilized, non-technological society". That alone should raise questions and is something to ponder, but not panic over. How and why they knew as much as they did with little to nothing is interesting, and so is their fascination with time, space and astronomy. Whatever will or will not happen is out of our hands and probably over our heads, so why sweat it. Pole shifts, ice ages, solar flares, asteroids, etc....have happened and will happen again, regardless of what we do.
The world is a pretty strange and magical place, heck it only takes a couple basic bio, chem and science courses to realize it's complexity and diversity. Let alone a small glimpse into quantum physics/mechanics would blow the minds of most simple minded people. So I personally don't rule out anything in life, anything. It's all in the realm of possibilities, including mass destruction on a specific date. But, I don't lose sleep over it.
Don't ya know atlantis was a bunch of aliens.I was watching a discovery channel thing, and it later was on history channel, about Aliens helping ancient civilations.
I was watching a discovery channel thing, and it later was on history channel, about Aliens helping ancient civilations.
I've seen and read a lot about that topic, much kinda crazy but there remains a whole lot of solid and intriguing research. It's a huge galaxy and a seemingly vast endless universe, so anything is possible.
The human race likes to believe it's the end all be all, but it's very unlikely. Who's to say our "god(s)" aren't ancient alien races that have visisted us and/or are still here. I don't know, but I always keep an open mind and heart...and refrain from dismissing such notions just because society thinks they know all the answers. It wasn't so long ago that people were burned at the stake for believing the Earth wasn't flat, and it wasn't the center of the universe.
The same evil, powerful, and greedy people who stiffled knowledge and information from the mass population throughout our history still remain. Don't think for one second that knowledge and information is no longer stiffled and/or misguided on purpose. It always has been and always will be.
So what you are saying is that the Scientologists might be right?
It is my personal opinion that we would be much more technologically advanced had it not been for certain organized groups with specific beliefs getting in the way of things
So what you are saying is that the Scientologists might be right?
It is my personal opinion that we would be much more technologically advanced had it not been for certain organized groups with specific beliefs getting in the way of things
No I am not saying that, I don't even exactly know what Scientology is about. All I've seen or heard about it is the criticism of actors such as Tom Cruise and John Travolta have received for their associations with it. I'm referring to the vast amount of scriptures, paintings, cave drawings, ancient texts, personal accounts throughout history that specifically talk about or depict extraterrestrial vehicles and life forms on this planet. It's not out of the realm of possibilities, nor is it laughable. Unless of course you are immature, close-minded and think you already have all the answers to life's age old questions....then yes it may be laughable.
Many topics or subjects can be made to look silly, unbelievable or laughable if done so by an organized effort by many. Something that occurs too often in our society, because many of us fear the notion that we might be wrong about something. I'm sure Scientology has it's extreme whackiness and insanity, but the same goes for every single religion/belief system on this planet. I for one don't adhere to or practice/preach any specific religion. The answer to most questions typically lies somewhere in the middle, between the polar extremes. Especially when it comes to religious beliefs and discussion.
I'm pretty sure L. Ron Hubbard admitted that he started Scientology as an elaborate way to create a tax shelter for himself.
I'm pretty sure L. Ron Hubbard admitted that he started Scientology as an elaborate way to create a tax shelter for himself.
He's probably reading this thread right now. (snicker)
In all seriousness, organized religion is probably the most successful cash cow for the "chosen few" since human antiquity.
I feel the same way.It was meant as a joke. Most people I have encountered think Scientology is a joke (I don't have an opinion on it one way or another) so it would be extremely ironic for the Scientologists to be right and the billion Christians to be wrong, especially the fundamentalists who believe anything other than accepting Jesus Christ as the savior is a sin against God (or something along those lines).
I have thought long and hard about existence many times. My religion doesn't claim to have any answer to the question, "How were we created?" There are some ideas about "life after death" but they aren't considered to be fact and are certainly not imposed on anyone. It is my personal opinion that we will find out when we get there. Everyone has a different journey to take. I think it is how you get there that matters more than what the "other side" may have to offer. If it's a bunch of aliens that put us here, fine. If it's not, that's fine too. Many people turn to religion because they want answers or are fearful of death. Is that a bad thing? I don't know. Maybe it's silly, maybe it's not. The truth is, we never really know when we are going to die and IMO no amount of praying will save you in many instances. The best thing is to be a good person, enjoy life, and enjoy others. If we die in 2012, then I will die knowing I have accomlished a lot and that, overall, I have found happiness. I just hope it isn't painful A meteor would do..
No I am not saying that, I don't even exactly know what Scientology is about. All I've seen or heard about it is the criticism of actors such as Tom Cruise and John Travolta have received for their associations with it. I'm referring to the vast amount of scriptures, paintings, cave drawings, ancient texts, personal accounts throughout history that specifically talk about or depict extraterrestrial vehicles and life forms on this planet. It's not out of the realm of possibilities, nor is it laughable. Unless of course you are immature, close-minded and think you already have all the answers to life's age old questions....then yes it may be laughable.
Many topics or subjects can be made to look silly, unbelievable or laughable if done so by an organized effort by many. Something that occurs too often in our society, because many of us fear the notion that we might be wrong about something. I'm sure Scientology has it's extreme whackiness and insanity, but the same goes for every single religion/belief system on this planet. I for one don't adhere to or practice/preach any specific religion. The answer to most questions typically lies somewhere in the middle, between the polar extremes. Especially when it comes to religious beliefs and discussion.
Classic middle groud fallacy. There is no middle groud in religion. Ether Jesus Christ is the son of God, the creator of heaven and earth, or he is not (for instance). What is the middle ground here? Jesus is his half-son? He created heaven but not earth?
like a demi-god?
Classic middle groud fallacy. There is no middle groud in religion. Ether Jesus Christ is the son of God, the creator of heaven and earth, or he is not (for instance). What is the middle ground here? Jesus is his half-son? He created heaven but not earth?
you people are all in here wasting your time blathering about religion when you could be out finding me a job.
I tend to agree with this. When you actually try to define what this "rational middle ground" is, things often start to fall apart. Your post reminds me of the three L's arguement that C.S. Lewis advoacted. Assuming the Bible gives us an accurate record of what Jesus said, you only have three options. He can be either a liar, a lunatic, or Lord. This goes against the common idea of Jesus as "a good person" or a phrophet. Anyway.... I apologize to the mods for dragging this furthur off topic
Classic middle groud fallacy. There is no middle groud in religion. Ether Jesus Christ is the son of God, the creator of heaven and earth, or he is not (for instance). What is the middle ground here? Jesus is his half-son? He created heaven but not earth?
I tend to agree with this. When you actually try to define what this "rational middle ground" is, things often start to fall apart. Your post reminds me of the three L's arguement that C.S. Lewis advoacted. Assuming the Bible gives us an accurate record of what Jesus said, you only have three options. He can be either a liar, a lunatic, or Lord. This goes against the common idea of Jesus as "a good person" or a phrophet. Anyway.... I apologize to the mods for dragging this furthur off topic
Oh dear. I wasn't using half-son to be clever.
So you're saying Jesus was an hermaphrodite?
I am intrigued by your ideas and would like to subscribe to your newsletter.
...or the fact that it took almost a century after the events occurred until they were written down caused some facts to get exaggerated or changed over time, thus making this Jesus fella neither a liar, lunatic, nor lord.
Or the entire thing is a work of fiction.
Or borrowed heavily from other man-god-savior mystery religions...