- Joined
- Jun 21, 2015
- Messages
- 2,215
- Reaction score
- 3,650
I saw a bunch of dentists and dental students as a team on Family Feud once. We're everywhere
"muslim"terrorist. Black "gangbanger". "Mentally deranged" white man. Is this really a surprise lol?And they only refer to him as "U.S. Dentist" and not just "U.S. Man" or something. This is a conspiracy to make people more afraid of the dentist.
Thread has been derailed. Original question was, why the emphasis on his "dentist"ness?
Clearly part of a liberal vendetta against a class popularly perceived as opulently wealthy and bored to the point of committing this type of act, and who need to be reined in somehow. Never mind the reality that most dentists are struggling with massive debt and have nothing even approximating $50,000 to drop on some hunting excursion.
There is a narrative being spun here that dentists are "too wealthy" and that their "excessive wealth" leads to behaviors like this. Look at the emphasis on how much he paid for the hunting license alone. As a hopeful future dentist I find this alarming.
A handwritten letter...I wrote a handwritten letter to Dr. Palmer's house and while chances are he'll never read it, I at least can say I tried to get through to him.
The real question is:" Why "angry mobs" are ruling this country now
I would disagree. Police and government went soft, that is why stupid mob decides who is guilty, instead of a judge. Going back to middle agesLow pay, white vs. black. Injustices.... That should cover the majority of reasons....
I would disagree. Police and government went soft, that is why stupid mob decides who is guilty, instead of a judge. Going back to middle ages
No, I just respect the law and would like everyone to do the same. I find it odd, that people find it acceptable to punish criminal offenses by eliminating person's source of income. If this dentist is guilty of a criminal offense, he should be punished or fined according to the law and not according to what you or me or somebody's grandma thinks is right. People, who harassed his busyness should have been fined, because it was dangerous to the publicNow this I find ironic... In a true democracy it would be mob rule. As we are more of a republic, elected leaders are supposed to represent their constituents. That IS modern governance. What you seem to be advocating, a totalitarian regime where the police oppress citizens at the behest of the government, THAT is going backwards.
Thank you!Innocent humans are getting "illegally" beheaded every day in the Middle East and death threats over shooting a lion?
Yea but the media usually has an agenda to categorize... Are they aiming to do that to all dentists? Lol"muslim"terrorist. Black "gangbanger". "Mentally deranged" white man. Is this really a surprise lol?
who knowsYea but the media usually has an agenda to categorize... Are they aiming to do that to all dentists? Lol
No, I just respect the law and would like everyone to do the same.I find it odd, that people find it acceptable to punish criminal offenses by eliminating person's source of income. If this dentist is guilty of a criminal offense, he should be punished or fined according to the law and not according to what you or me or somebody's grandma thinks is right. People, who harassed his busyness should have been fined, because it was dangerous to the public
It easy for you to talk now, but imagine yourself making a mistake and then expecting the mob justice
No matter the backlash, the number of letters delivered to his house, or the size of the pile of stuffed animals in front of his office, there is little chance that anyone is going to convince this man that he was wrong. As Socrates famously said, "no one knowingly commits evil." People have myriad ways of justifying their actions to themselves. Even heinous killers who aren't certifiably insane generally have 'reasons' for the commission of their crimes. I suspect that the number of prisoners serving time for rape, murder, assault, etc. probably have some justification for their behavior. Very few people ever own up to and take responsibility for their actions, no matter the pressure.
He is being investigated by USFWS to determine if he violated US law under the Lacey Act, which bars trading in wildlife that has been illegally killed, transported, or sold.Is this within the jurisdiction of the U.S. attorney's office? I do understand the U.S. had an agreement with Zimbabwe, so what they can probably do is extradite him back to Zimbabwe to face any charges in that country.