When you are desperate for a propaganda win...

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.
The p for survival was 0.059- so 94% chance that there is an overall survival improvement?
That is a common misinterpretation of a p-value.

p-values do not measure the probability that the studied hypothesis is true.

Ronald L. Wasserstein & Nicole A. Lazar (2016) The ASA Statement on p-Values: Context, Process, and Purpose, The American Statistician, 70:2, 129-133, DOI: 10.1080/00031305.2016.1154108

Principle 2


Have you seen the data?
 
If the vast majority of internal medicine docs can't design and interpret clinical trials properly, then why think anyone in pharma out government can? Just saying.
 
I just want to see this data actually written up with as a paper, or even an abstract. How has it been a press release only for what seems like 3-5 days?

****, give a motivated Rad Onc resident or junior attending the data and a day, you'll get a full paper back.

FDA approvals based on a pharma-funded study that has not been reviewed in anyway and we're basing the data on a press release? Agree with the topic of the title on this one. Hope Fauci talking like trump ("game changer") is a one-off and his brain has not rotted due to his proximity to the administration.
 
Top