Would you apply today?

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

Would you apply today?

  • Yes

    Votes: 20 27.0%
  • No

    Votes: 42 56.8%
  • Depends

    Votes: 12 16.2%

  • Total voters
    74
It isn't the same now. It just isn't


I guess all I am saying is people paint a way too rosy picture of the past here, when that is not what most people say in real life that I know and talk to.

when you graduated, did you have your pick of the litter in location or find the perfect first job? or did you settle in something (even if 1-2/3) and later on move to something better?

largely speaking people I know still do that.

Members don't see this ad.
 
I guess all I am saying is people paint a way too rosy picture of the past here, when that is not what most people say in real life that I know and talk to.

when you graduated, did you have your pick of the litter in location or find the perfect first job? or did you settle in something (even if 1-2/3) and later on move to something better?

largely speaking people I know still do that.
Geography was worse in some ways but private and technical partnership opportunities were much better and it felt easier to lateral out.

It ain't just about the Benjamin's guys and gals, autonomy plays a huge role in job satisfaction IMHO
 
Last edited:
when you graduated, did you have your pick of the litter in location or find the perfect first job?
I am 10 years out from a top 5 program. At that time, I went deep into spring senior year before I had an offer. I went on half a dozen interviews and most of the positions offered were openly exploitive. I eventually signed with the best of the worst but moved on within 5 years. The comment at the time was, "its cyclical, and this is a down year".

In the last year, I've looked at openings. I have had one firm offer from a solid private group, but otherwise, very little. As a solidly trained, experienced, board-certified physician with marketable skills beyond the clinic, I'm concerned about the lack of mobility. I know I could secure employment elsewhere, but it will undoubtedly take a good amount of effort. It is most certainly not the the pick of the litter.
 
Members don't see this ad :)
As has been said for years Rad Onc has amongst the worst job markets in all of medicine, although, it may not be quite as bad today as compared to pre Covid.
 
As has been said for years Rad Onc has amongst the worst job markets in all of medicine, although, it may not be quite as bad today as compared to pre Covid.


When was it the worst then in your view? 2015-2020?
 
No I would not apply again.

Part of this is I feel no sense of community from the specialty. ASTRO and SCAROP are my colleagues, senior colleagues, but colleagues. A lot of them know what’s going on with practice consolidation, lack of upward mobility, decreasing fractions and utilization, and still have pushed and maintained this level of training. Very few voices speak up, because it benefits them to exploit the system this way. Makes me feel completely disconnected from the so called influencers of the field.

Part of this is my preferred market is saturated. And the big centers have bought almost all the little guys, and what they didn’t close turned into a lousy, likely non sustainable job. Jokes on me.

As for the partnership discussion, had an offer for a potential pro partnership. What held me back was, it wasn’t that close to where I wanted to be and it had a buy in. That’s fine, buy ins respect the work of others. When you graduate with a couple hundred thousand in debt already rocking away, calculate how long it takes your return on investment to start low on salary and then even more loans. I did, eventually it would have been better than where I am not, but 12 years or so for the difference.


Would have done med onc. Clinic is brutal at times, but the flexibility they have always had I didn’t appreciate and now it’s drastically more than ours. And pharma will be a better lobby than anything we will ever have behind us. Live and learn.
 
Part of this is I feel no sense of community from the specialty. ASTRO and SCAROP are my colleagues, senior colleagues, but colleagues. A lot of them know what’s going on with practice consolidation, lack of upward mobility, decreasing fractions and utilization, and still have pushed and maintained this level of training. Very few voices speak up, because it benefits them to exploit the system this way. Makes me feel completely disconnected from the so called influencers of the field.

This is so well put and this phenomenon extends well beyond our over-training issue.
 
No I would not apply again.

Part of this is I feel no sense of community from the specialty. ASTRO and SCAROP are my colleagues, senior colleagues, but colleagues. A lot of them know what’s going on with practice consolidation, lack of upward mobility, decreasing fractions and utilization, and still have pushed and maintained this level of training. Very few voices speak up, because it benefits them to exploit the system this way. Makes me feel completely disconnected from the so called influencers of the field.

Part of this is my preferred market is saturated. And the big centers have bought almost all the little guys, and what they didn’t close turned into a lousy, likely non sustainable job. Jokes on me.

As for the partnership discussion, had an offer for a potential pro partnership. What held me back was, it wasn’t that close to where I wanted to be and it had a buy in. That’s fine, buy ins respect the work of others. When you graduate with a couple hundred thousand in debt already rocking away, calculate how long it takes your return on investment to start low on salary and then even more loans. I did, eventually it would have been better than where I am not, but 12 years or so for the difference.


Would have done med onc. Clinic is brutal at times, but the flexibility they have always had I didn’t appreciate and now it’s drastically more than ours. And pharma will be a better lobby than anything we will ever have behind us. Live and learn.

Looking at the Astro board right now, there are 19 total members, 16 of which are from academic residency programs. 3 are from non academic programs with 2 from very large and private practice groups and one looks to be community hospital employed. Why doesn't the board better reflect how rad onc is practiced in the US? Why has it never reflected this? I would submit this is at the root of why so many rad oncs are antagonistic to Astro.
 
Rad onc is a great field with a poor/down trending job market. Great lifestyle and patient interactions but declining salaries, saturated markets, and limited flexibility are the issues. Large academic centers are buying community clinics - these jobs involve 100% clinical work (no research time, no academic involvement) but at academic pay. Even large PP groups are trying to employ physicians. These are all signs of a subpar market. If you are able to find a good job, then it's the best field in medicine but those jobs are scarce. Additionally, there have been no initiatives to curb the supply issue.
 
To answer the OP: no. I would do med onc without thinking twice. To quote The Great One, you want to "skate to where the puck is going, not where it has been". And the puck sure aint going to rad onc. All the more depressing to type this is that I have about thirty years left of practice in me.
 
Looking at the Astro board right now, there are 19 total members, 16 of which are from academic residency programs. 3 are from non academic programs with 2 from very large and private practice groups and one looks to be community hospital employed. Why doesn't the board better reflect how rad onc is practiced in the US? Why has it never reflected this? I would submit this is at the root of why so many rad oncs are antagonistic to Astro.

..and how many from PPSE exempt centers? ....where many rules/policies have minimal impact on them. All a recipe for bad decisions for the whole with zero consequences to decision makers.
 
To answer the OP: no. I would do med onc without thinking twice. To quote The Great One, you want to "skate to where the puck is going, not where it has been". And the puck sure aint going to rad onc. All the more depressing to type this is that I have about thirty years left of practice in me.
Agree, and this is the most important point IMO. I see no indication of initiatives to expand the scope of practice for radiation oncologists, and our intervention will continue to dwindle in terms of definitive management of disease (there may be some exceptions).

When people ask me about what's new in cancer care, it never substantially involves radiation. We are kind of peripheral docs (with the associated downside and upside). It's why our lifestyle is so good. It's why our future is not bright.
 
Members don't see this ad :)

Never seen anything remotely like this in rad onc.
 

Never seen anything remotely like this in rad onc.
💯💯💯

Rads is still plenty hot. Even hospital jobs offering 1 week of nights, 2 weeks off as a full time package
 
My favorite part of the rad onc job hunt experience is recruiters emailing or texting about amazing 7 figure job in big city, only to follow up and say they’re in fact looking for radiologist or med onc, and if I have a colleague to refer them to
 

Never seen anything remotely like this in rad onc.

LOL so their like "remote track" alternative option is still better than the median rad onc contract and you work from home. Wild times in medicine.
 
My favorite part of the rad onc job hunt experience is recruiters emailing or texting about amazing 7 figure job in big city, only to follow up and say they’re in fact looking for radiologist or med onc, and if I have a colleague to refer them to
my favorite part is that they all somehow have my cell number and call over and over again in the middle of clinic
 
A few thoughts....

At 63, I too am looking at retirement after 35ish years. It has been a great run. From a perspective of medical practice I could not have been happier. Financially it has been fine.

What the future holds for our specialty and medicine in general seems bleak. I worry about who will provide care for me when I get sick. I stay healthy because of it.

If I were to practice medicine I cannot imagine any other specialty.

I recall as a new attending being told I missed the golden age of medicine. I think all those at the end of their career think they had it better.

While considering my options of what to do with my very busy solo freestanding center, I have spoken to a few young doctors. At the risk of offending some, I am shocked at the nature of their expectations. I wish you all luck. It is not a job, but a profession.
Residents seem to want a full salary from day 1. I had a low front end for 3 years to partnership in a professional only practice.
They also want a 3-4 day work week. I am bewildered.

Quality patient care is always going to be successful. Hard work is mandatory. Being available is critical. The rewards are not just monetary. Monetary rewards will always decline moving forward unfortunately. The people going into our field only seem interested in money and lifestyle.

ASTRO has not been effective in maintaining our specialty. I am not renewing my membership.

I am sure many people will disagree but these are my thoughts. I have been reading this board for a couple of years, and have thought about the future of Rad Onc a lot. I have not written much, but I guess this might be useful to some. Even now I am considering not posting this.
It’s not that new grads don’t want to work hard, it’s that we unfortunately can’t always afford the 3-year lower salary. The average student loan is $300-400k. So for the past 4-5 years, we’ve seen our friends in other fields specially tech, get rich while we collected 6-7% interest on our already ridiculously high debt. Now, there’s a hospital employed position that pays $500-550k, it’s eligible for PSLF and usually some quality/productivity bonus VS. the private practice with 3-year partnership track that pays $350k for the first 3 years. That’s about $1M difference, so unless partners are making $1M+ it’s just not worth it.
 
It’s not that new grads don’t want to work hard, it’s that we unfortunately can’t always afford the 3-year lower salary. The average student loan is $300-400k. So for the past 4-5 years, we’ve seen our friends in other fields specially tech, get rich while we collected 6-7% interest on our already ridiculously high debt. Now, there’s a hospital employed position that pays $500-550k, it’s eligible for PSLF and usually some quality/productivity bonus VS. the private practice with 3-year partnership track that pays $350k for the first 3 years. That’s about $1M difference, so unless partners are making $1M+ it’s just not worth it.
Not disagreeing, just adding info to the discussion. I left fellowship PGY5 with 120K in debt of HEAL loans at 12 percent interest. 1990ish
 
My favorite part of the rad onc job hunt experience is recruiters emailing or texting about amazing 7 figure job in big city, only to follow up and say they’re in fact looking for radiologist or med onc, and if I have a colleague to refer them to

lol, happens like once a week. A constant reminder to choose your specialty wisely.
 
More perspective. Wow, how did I get so old. It seems like yesterday.

From Google

According to inflation calculations, $120,000 in 1990 would be equivalent to approximately $291,664 today, while $175,000 in 1990 would be equivalent to roughly $425,344 today, reflecting the cumulative inflation over the years

My loans and first year salary....

$280,000 in 1994 is equivalent in purchasing power to about $600,188.12 today.

My 4th year partnership salary. Professional only

In 1994, the average 30-year fixed mortgage rate was 8.28% to 8.38%

The maximum interest rate for Health Education Assistance Loans (HEAL) in 1990 was 11 1/2% at the end of March, 11 5/8% at the end of June and September, and 11 1/4% at the end of December.

My "low front end" over the 3 years was about 200k.

$200,000 in 1993 is equivalent in purchasing power to about $439,683.04 today. That was my buy in if you will. (approximately over the 3 years)
 
Last edited:
Besides geographic limitations, it's still a field that offers >$500k pay, no call or weekends, limited hands on procedures, and very interesting work right? So even if this isn't as good as it was 20 years ago, this still seems far better than several other specialties. What am I missing? Especially if you are not interested in heme onc or rads.
 
Besides geographic limitations, it's still a field that offers >$500k pay, no call or weekends, limited hands on procedures, and very interesting work right? So even if this isn't as good as it was 20 years ago, this still seems far better than several other specialties. What am I missing? Especially if you are not interested in heme onc or rads.

"Far better than several other specialties" is not something I can agree with anymore. No ability to select geographic area/region of practice and very difficult lateral movement need to be factored into the equation.

edit: I wrote this at the same time as the comment above and didn't see it.
 
Besides geographic limitations, it's still a field that offers >$500k pay, no call or weekends, limited hands on procedures, and very interesting work right? So even if this isn't as good as it was 20 years ago, this still seems far better than several other specialties. What am I missing? Especially if you are not interested in heme onc or rads.
Plenty
 
So it does in fact seem like if you’re ok with limited geography, you’d have a high paying clinical salary in a job you enjoy.

If the median MGMA is 550-600, is >500 exceedingly common?
 
There is a nonzero chance that you will be unemployed at some point.
How many years into the future is this likely to be true. In todays market, demand seems plenty.

If the alternative was lower paying IM sub specialties like rheum, endo, allergy, would you pick those instead of rad onc now?
 
So it does in fact seem like if you’re ok with limited geography, you’d have a high paying clinical salary in a job you enjoy.

If the median MGMA is 550-600, is >500 exceedingly common?
I can tell you that hospital employed gigs in the midwest city I am in pay below MGMA median. Supply/demand.
 
How many years into the future is this likely to be true. In todays market, demand seems plenty.

If the alternative was lower paying IM sub specialties like rheum, endo, allergy, would you pick those instead of rad onc now?
Allergy is not a lower paying IM subspecialty whatsoever and should not be lumped in with the lower paying subspecialties ie ID endo Nephro etc. Avg for PP allergist is around 350K-450K+ not including partnership models who make even more. Allergy is like the derm of IM (crazy competive now-income potential 400K+ working 35 hours per week? no wonder its gotten the way it is). It is without question the highest paying on average of the lifestyle IM subspecialties
 
Last edited:
Allergy is not a lower paying IM subspecialty whatsoever and should not be lumped in with the lower paying subspecialties ie ID endo Nephro etc. Avg for PP allergist is around 350K-450K+ not including partnership models who make even more. Allergy is like the derm of IM (crazy competive now-income potential 400K+ working 35 hours per week? no wonder its gotten the way it is). It is without question the highest paying on average of the lifestyle IM subspecialties
All of the median stats including medscape, MGMA, Marit show a median around 300-320 with the achievable high end of 400. That’s around the same as hospitalist. Sure there are outliers as with any specialty but it’s not the same as median of 550-600 for PP rad onc. It doesn’t seem common to cross 500 in allergy.
 
All of the median stats including medscape, MGMA, Marit show a median around 300-320 with the achievable high end of 400. That’s around the same as hospitalist. Sure there are outliers as with any specialty but it’s not the same as median of 550-600 for PP rad onc. It doesn’t seem common to cross 500 in allergy.
You cant use online salaries to predict allergy they make WAY more than hospitalists. Allergy salaries are artificially low online because academics bring them WAY down. Academic allergy salary is lower than like Peds which brings down the median. Avg PP allergist makes 400K+. If youre going into PP you can expect to cross 400K do you have any idea how lucrative shots can be?
 
I think I'd believe the salary data published by multiple institutions that poll people and not the "TRUST ME BRO, I KNOW SOMEONE" method.

90th+ percentile allergists/immunos are making around 550-600k but that is total compensation.
75%ile around 500k
 
Last edited:
I think I'd believe the salary data published by multiple institutions that poll people and not the "TRUST ME BRO, I KNOW SOMEONE" method.
Allergy is different because of the wide discrepancy between academics and non-academics. I would not lump Allergy into the lower paying IM subs like nephro ID endo etc and certainly not the same as hospitalist or primary care
 
Allergy is different because of the wide discrepancy between academics and non-academics. I would not lump Allergy into the lower paying IM subs like nephro ID endo etc and certainly not the same as hospitalist or primary care
Data is often broken down into percentiles, so easy to assume most of the academics are in the lower portion and PP in higher percentiles, but also some break down by practice type.
 
Data is often broken down into percentiles, so easy to assume most of the academics are in the lower portion and PP in higher percentiles, but also some break down by practice type.
The only one that I would trust would be Marit but there still isnt enough data. Theres like 10 posts but If you exclude academics (150s or so) the avg already on there is like high 300s and that includes employed which typically pays a little less than private. Of the lifestyle specialties in IM Allergy is the highest when it comes to income and yes it does on avg pay more than Rheum too
 
The only one that I would trust would be Marit but there still isnt enough data. Theres like 10 posts but If you exclude academics (150s or so) the avg already on there is like high 300s and that includes employed which typically pays a little less than private. Of the lifestyle specialties in IM Allergy is the highest when it comes to income and yes it does on avg pay more than Rheum too

is it easy to open a IM Allergy PP or join an existing practice in a major top 10 metro? how's the geographic flexibility?
 
is it easy to open a IM Allergy PP or join an existing practice in a major top 10 metro? how's the geographic flexibility?
Absolutely, so I would say job market for allergy is probably worse than say Rheum (more jobs for sure). But plenty of opportunities to start your own practice or join a group just depends on where you want to practice some areas worse than others (socal virginia right outside of DC and SC coastal areas like charleston or Hilton head are booming rn where as a lot of southern florida is getting bought out by PE which sucks). Like with most specialties working in huge cities like NYC, LA, Chicago youre going to likely be making less as opposed to the suburbs or rural regions. Overall, geo flexibility is fine but worse than say Rheum, Endo etc simply bc they have more jobs since there are simply more rheumatologists and endos. Allergy is a small field but you will without question make more in Allergy
 
I think I'd believe the salary data published by multiple institutions that poll people and not the "TRUST ME BRO, I KNOW SOMEONE" method.

90th+ percentile allergists/immunos are making around 550-600k but that is total compensation.
75%ile around 500k
That’s actually a solid number of people making 500+ esp given how low the median is.
 
No. I would not apply today.

The reason: Particular radiation regimens being dictated by "experts" and insurance companies (perhaps they are the same?) despite having more toxicity and potentially less efficacy.

That is the biggest problem I have with "modern" radiotherapy.

At the end of the day, money cannot make up for that.
 
Out of curiosity - which regimens are being pushed that you feel have less efficacy?
 
Top