D
deleted1095841
Title says it all. In which specialties would an away rotation be recommended? In which would it be required?
Thanks! What about IM, Neuro, Radiology, and Ophtho?- EM to get your Standardized Letter of Evaluations (SLoE) from at least 2 programs. If you have a home program, then you need at least one away.
- All competitive specialties (Ortho, N Surg, Plastics, Derm, etc...) to maximize your chances of matching. Do as many as you can!
IM and Neuro are not competitive so not needed. Unless you are targeting a specific program or one of the top 20-30.Thanks! What about IM, Neuro, Radiology, and Ophtho?
Radiology definitely doesn’t, if only because there’s not much to do on a radiology rotation to impress. IR is an exception.IM and Neuro are not competitive so not needed. Unless you are targeting a specific program or one of the top 20-30.
Ophtho definitely, it's super competitive
Radiology maybe, it's borderline competitive as well, but not like Ophtho, Ortho, Derm, etc...
rads is +/-Radiology definitely doesn’t, if only because there’s not much to do on a radiology rotation to impress. IR is an exception.
I have never heard of doing an away for anesthesia.What's the skinny on anesthesia aways? Have heard conflicting advice.
Apparently becoming more common based on reddit. Have heard tons of people say they were "strongly recommended" to do one. But at my institution, almost no one does them.I have never heard of doing an away for anesthesia.
I think if you don't have a home program its worth it.What's the skinny on anesthesia aways? Have heard conflicting advice.
Thats crazy. I mean I know it is becoming more competitive but I don't think its near audition competitive quite yet.Apparently becoming more common based on reddit. Have heard tons of people say they were "strongly recommended" to do one. But at my institution, almost no one does them.
Huge advantage if you do them imoWhat's the skinny on anesthesia aways? Have heard conflicting advice.
Aways in psych are a good help or a nail in your coffin, depending. I feel like a good portion of people match where they do aways in the field compared with others, which makes sense given the very personality-driven nature of psych
Psych has gotten considerably more competitive over the past few years. Of the programs I'm really close with about half of the classes from the past 4 years are comprised of people that did aways. To stand out the big thing is just personality and how well people think you fit within the program. Knowledge can be taught, but personalities... They are a challenge to address if they conflict with the general vibe of a program. Poor interpersonal skills with patients and superficial disinterest are other potential app killers, and are surprisingly common in the "psych as a lifestyle specialty" types that have no real love for the field itself.Maybe things have changed since I went through the Match five years ago. At least back then, the consensus was that you might do an away if you want to for your own purposes (to experience a program you were considering ranking highly, etc.), but that it was completely unnecessary for the purposes of matching well. I don’t think anyone I knew did an away in psych and doing one was not really a thing.
Also, as an aside, the following might just be a “me thing” but I think it is a “psych thing.” I find it strangely kind of difficult for a student on psych to impress and/or stand out. There aren’t really any procedures in psych and most of the psychotherapy happens in outpatient visits. Nobody is going to let a med student attempt psychotherapy on their patients during outpatient visits they are billing for (based on time). You might be able to show an impressive level of knowledge about DSM criteria or something, but ironically the DSM is also something that seems to get deemphasized the further you go in practice (i.e. everyone gets taught that you need 5 criteria for MDD, but no good psychiatrist I know is going to avoid diagnosing obvious depression and starting an antidepressant because they have 4 criteria). Dosages can be looked up. I guess I might be impressed if a med student could recite all of the REMS criteria or something, but even then. Most of the actual proficiency in psychiatry is in the realm of nuanced diagnostics that no medical student is going to know. Obviously it’s not impossible to be a truly impressive med student but I think that it is, oddly, particularly difficult in psychiatry because of the lack of “demonstrables” for med students.
On the flip side, I think you’re definitely right that it’s very easy to demonstrate that you are a terrible med student and/or a terrible fit for psychiatry. There are a few ways I’ve primarily seen this occur. One is where the med student has either an explicit or implicit disdain for the methods of psychiatry and doesn’t seem to think that experienced psychiatrists have anything of value to offer. If the med student won’t listen to the attending or resident’s teaching about assessment and treatment or change their practice accordingly in the same way they would if they were being taught auscultation by a cardiology fellow, that’s a big problem. The other thing that can happen is that the med student simply has terrible bedside manner and patient rapport-building skills. If the med student is hostile or contemptuous towards patients, even subtly, that’s always very bad. Both of these types of students often seem to have no idea that this is how they’re coming across, too, so it’s not inconceivable that someone might even get to the point of doing an away and still look like a tool.
Some good points in here.Maybe things have changed since I went through the Match five years ago. At least back then, the consensus was that you might do an away if you want to for your own purposes (to experience a program you were considering ranking highly, etc.), but that it was completely unnecessary for the purposes of matching well. I don’t think anyone I knew did an away in psych and doing one was not really a thing.
Also, as an aside, the following might just be a “me thing” but I think it is a “psych thing.” I find it strangely kind of difficult for a student on psych to impress and/or stand out. There aren’t really any procedures in psych and most of the psychotherapy happens in outpatient visits. Nobody is going to let a med student attempt psychotherapy on their patients during outpatient visits they are billing for (based on time). You might be able to show an impressive level of knowledge about DSM criteria or something, but ironically the DSM is also something that seems to get deemphasized the further you go in practice (i.e. everyone gets taught that you need 5 criteria for MDD, but no good psychiatrist I know is going to avoid diagnosing obvious depression and starting an antidepressant because they have 4 criteria). Dosages can be looked up. I guess I might be impressed if a med student could recite all of the REMS criteria or something, but even then. Most of the actual proficiency in psychiatry is in the realm of nuanced diagnostics that no medical student is going to know. Obviously it’s not impossible to be a truly impressive med student but I think that it is, oddly, particularly difficult in psychiatry because of the lack of “demonstrables” for med students.
On the flip side, I think you’re definitely right that it’s very easy to demonstrate that you are a terrible med student and/or a terrible fit for psychiatry. There are a few ways I’ve primarily seen this occur. One is where the med student has either an explicit or implicit disdain for the methods of psychiatry and doesn’t seem to think that experienced psychiatrists have anything of value to offer. If the med student won’t listen to the attending or resident’s teaching about assessment and treatment or change their practice accordingly in the same way they would if they were being taught auscultation by a cardiology fellow, that’s a big problem. The other thing that can happen is that the med student simply has terrible bedside manner and patient rapport-building skills. If the med student is hostile or contemptuous towards patients, even subtly, that’s always very bad. Both of these types of students often seem to have no idea that this is how they’re coming across, too, so it’s not inconceivable that someone might even get to the point of doing an away and still look like a tool.
This is so true. The absolute worst resident to deal with isn't the one who's incompetent (because that can be fixed), it's the one who is arrogant, overly-confident, and bristles at anyone (including attendings and patients) who doesn't show them deference, let alone disagrees with them. These kind of people can hide it during interviews, but it always comes out during aways.Knowledge can be taught, but personalities... They are a challenge to address if they conflict with the general vibe of a program.