- Joined
- May 7, 2011
- Messages
- 455
- Reaction score
- 8
Well said. Doesn't it make sense then... that URM status be decided more on a financial basis than on race?
Because classically, or historically if you prefer, people identified as belonging to certain minority groups, have been marginalized in society, leading to socioECONOMIC disadvantages that impeded access to adequate medical care, education, jobs.....poor education....less job options...start a family....can still only provide so much for your kin....can't afford to pay for better education, so your kin falls victim to this vicious cycle....the URM programs grant these individuals who have broken their socioeconomic barriers with opportunities to free themselves of this cycle through education, and bring back to their communities medical access, so that medical disparities contribute less to the vicious cycle known as "the struggle". This is the financial imperative that you are unclear about: it's called the struggle.
Puff Daddy's son is a minority. Do you think he had these kinds of problems? No. So, since these obstacles to achieve great potential were not present, should Puffy's son be granted URM "benefit" simply because he's black? The answer is no. The color of your skin, does not automatically grant this status. It is multifactorial, and since the factors in question are largely financial.....URM is denoted with much emphasis on economic standing, but not purely so. Even if you are a poor white kid, chances are you still haven't been subject to societal marginalization, despite lower economic standing.