- Joined
- Jul 11, 2002
- Messages
- 918
- Reaction score
- 41
I'm a CA-1 anesthesia resident. I recently had an attending try to get me to do a retrobulbar block. The retina fellow and ophtho attending were cool with it, but I did back out of it. I had read about it, but stated that I would much rather start with a peribulbar block if I was going to start sticking needles near the eye.
In the 'real world', is this a useful skill for me to have? You guys are much more familiar with the anatomy of this area, and in talking with other residents, most have not picked up this block. Nonetheless, my attending told me that at some surgery centers, the anesthesiologist is expected to do all the blocks for eye surgery 😱 .
On a completely different note, GI docs have recently pushed the FDA into changing propofol labeling to state that it is not a general anesthetic so they can use it for colonoscopies without anesthesia presence. So far, my experience in the eye room has been 'little propofol for the block, little less for the case'. If given the option of using this drug without an anesthesia provider present, do you think eye surgeons would do so? Just wondering.
In the 'real world', is this a useful skill for me to have? You guys are much more familiar with the anatomy of this area, and in talking with other residents, most have not picked up this block. Nonetheless, my attending told me that at some surgery centers, the anesthesiologist is expected to do all the blocks for eye surgery 😱 .
On a completely different note, GI docs have recently pushed the FDA into changing propofol labeling to state that it is not a general anesthetic so they can use it for colonoscopies without anesthesia presence. So far, my experience in the eye room has been 'little propofol for the block, little less for the case'. If given the option of using this drug without an anesthesia provider present, do you think eye surgeons would do so? Just wondering.