- Joined
- May 28, 2007
- Messages
- 8,454
- Reaction score
- 39
I'm not negative towards DOs. I just dislike this double-standard of being different yet being the same simultaneously. DO schools themselves talk about their different approaches. I think you're projecting generic negativity onto me, which is unfair. I mentioned before osteopathic medicine is a very good path, just not for me. What's wrong with that? Sure, getting asked what an osteopath is is a very superficial reason not to want to be a DO, but why does my reasoning matter? If I said I didn't want to go to UVA's med school because they are my school rival no one would give a crap, but I say I don't want to go to a DO school for just as silly of a reason and all-of-a-sudden I'm insecure?
I personally don't think DO is inferior or that there should be a negative stigma around it. I think it's great and I'm glad that DO schools exist because we need physicians. However, I think it's false to say there's no differences when the schools themselves promote those differences and every DO student I've ever talked to mentions them. What else do I have to go by but what the schools project and others tell me? I'm not attending both an osteopathic and an allopathic school, only an allopathic one so I have no way to personally experience any differences.
And DO schools do have lower stats. Last I checked, no DO school had an average MCAT over 30 and the average GPA hovers around a 3.3. I'm not trying to imply that that makes them inferior, just stating facts. Either these schools are looking for something different in their students or they're not..you tell me which is the case.
[/LIST]
http://www.osteopathic.org/index.cfm?PageID=ado_whatis
Sounds like they're toting something different to me.
1. I apologize if it seems like I'm projecting anger towards you ... it's not my intent.
2. I've always been a large component of the idea that it is okay to not go or apply to a DO school simply because you want the MD. Nothing wrong with that. You did the work, you're paying the money, if you want it ... get it. That was never my mentality, but I understand it ... and I'd never judge someone for it.
3. The stat thing is seriously something I don't want to get into. On average, DO stats are lower ... I personally think it's complicated, and the average is misleading, and I've stated it all out before - simply don't have the energy to do it again. But I'm not going to be one of those people who denies that, on average, DO stats are lower than MD stats ... I just don't agree that it's so cut and dry. Oh and, just FYI, schools like Western and UMDNJ have MCAT scores in the 28+ to 29 range that are creeping up each year.
4. Again, it's not surprising that the AOA/osteopathic.org is promoting it's "special difference." As myself and a few others stated ... they are the ones to benefit from it. The reason this idea is perpetuated is because, like I said, it's what allows the AOA to stay in business ... build new schools, profit, expand, etc. I truly don't know what students you've been speaking with ... but I find very, very few who stick with the differences mantra, and I agree the -separate, but equal when we want it ... but different when we also want it - mantra is annoying.
Frankly, at this point, I do have an interest in OMM, and I really can fathom the guy/girl who applies only to DO schools, becomes an OMM fellow, does a NMM/OMM residency, promoting that message or really treating patients differently ... but this is .01% of DOs. 99.9% of them practice identical to MDs, a lot even trained in ACGME programs -do you really think if there was such a core difference, DOs would be able to complete ACGME residencies and become BC in AMBS fields -, and most would probably roll their eyes if you asked them how they practice holistic, whole-patient, medicine as (for example) a BC radiologist who did an ACGME residency.