Why does tapping on a vein make it bulge?

Started by SmokD
This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.
Get help with your application

Use all the free resources available to you from SDN: articles, guides, expert advising, forums discussions, and school research.

SmokD

Full Member
10+ Year Member
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
Tittle speaks for itself. Anesthesiologist asked the question in the room and I told him I'd look it up. Please do my homework for me 😀 (I did do a brief google search to no avail)
 
only thing i could think of would be related to some form of auto-regulation, whereby tapping on it causes compression and then some rapid expansion. I dunno...
 
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
I always thought it was because you were holding the hand down (allowing gravity to work), and then tapping on more proximal veins which opens the venous valves, thus allowing blood to pool at the distal veins. Just a thought.
 
It doesn't. I worked as a phlebotomist for a few years and never noticed a bulging reaction just by tapping on a vein. Some old-timers will slap the skin but that doesn't help either. Maybe they were looking for something like reactive hyperemia. The only thing that makes the vein bulge is a downstream occlusion with a tourniquet.
 
It doesn't. I worked as a phlebotomist for a few years and never noticed a bulging reaction just by tapping on a vein. Some old-timers will slap the skin but that doesn't help either. Maybe they were looking for something like reactive hyperemia. The only thing that makes the vein bulge is a downstream occlusion with a tourniquet.

Worked as a medic for 12 years. It works.
 
I'll go ahead and give a quasi-physiological reason:

Tapping the vein causes reflex mechanism producing venous dilation in response to venous congestion. In other words, you trick your vein into thinking there is a lack of blood flow to the area for a split second, so a compensatory (and fleeting) increase in blood flow follows. Then it all returns to normal seconds later.
 
Stasis in an area that is already static? I dunno, I'm not buying.

How about this: tapping tricks the body into thinking the area is injured, triggering the local release of inflammatory factors that transiently increase blood flow in the "injured" area, which then flows into the local vein, dilating it.

You might want to look up what the word 'stasis' means. If there was real stasis below the tourniquet, you wouldn't be able to fill up vials of blood with the needle.

Real stasis is tapping/rubbing the vein and causing a stop of blood flow for a split second.
 
Tapping the vein causes reflex mechanism producing venous dilation in response to venous congestion. In other words, you trick your vein into thinking there is a lack of blood flow to the area for a split second, so a compensatory (and fleeting) increase in blood flow follows. Then it all returns to normal seconds later.

That sounds sciency enough, I think I'll go with that 😎 Thanks!

EDIT: On second thought, I dont get this. Can veins be autoregulated? They lack smooth muscle, so how do you alter the capacitance of a vein?
 
A touniquet exerts quite a bit more than the 10-30 mmHg pressure in a vein, which means blood is no longer flowing through the vein once you apply the tourniquet. When you puncture the vein, pressure from below pushes it up through the needle (plus the vacuum from the tube) causing flow. Basically, no flow when tourniquet applied, then flow when secondary channel is created...

I don't buy it.
 
From http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15219306

Tapping a superficial vein once or twice augments vein distention (8). The mechanism by which this occurs is unclear (2). Given the rapidity of venodilatation after this stimulus, venodilatation theoretically may be related to antidromic effects of nociceptive C-fibers or release of chemical mediators such as nitrous oxide found in the venous endothelium [11] and [12] . Applying a mild, sliding pressure (“milking”) along a short length of vein, from proximal to distal, displaces blood distally resulting in vein distention (2).
 
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
That sounds sciency enough, I think I'll go with that 😎 Thanks!

EDIT: On second thought, I dont get this. Can veins be autoregulated? They lack smooth muscle, so how do you alter the capacitance of a vein?

Veins do have smooth muscle (but less than arteries) and have the ability to alter their capacitance via alpha and nitric oxide receptors among other things.
 
You might want to look up what the word 'stasis' means. If there was real stasis below the tourniquet, you wouldn't be able to fill up vials of blood with the needle.
The stasis no longer applies when you apply a vacuum tube upstream of the occlusion. You're now providing a way out.
 
The stasis no longer applies when you apply a vacuum tube upstream of the occlusion. You're now providing a way out.

There would not be a build-up of pressure if it was static. Pressure would only build if there was flow.
 
There would not be a build-up of pressure if it was static. Pressure would only build if there was flow.
If you have a capped syringe full of fluid, you can push on the plunger and increase the pressure without any flow. It will be static. As soon as you provide a way out, then you'll have flow.
 
If you have a capped syringe full of fluid, you can push on the plunger and increase the pressure without any flow. It will be static. As soon as you provide a way out, then you'll have flow.

Unless a tourniquet can block off deep veins, there is no stasis. I don't know what type of tourniquets that you use, but I haven't cut off all circulation in over a 1000 blood draws. Heck, with teenage boys, I sometimes don't even use a tourniquet.
 
Unless a tourniquet can block off deep veins, there is no stasis. I don't know what type of tourniquets that you use, but I haven't cut off all circulation in over a 1000 blood draws. Heck, with teenage boys, I sometimes don't even use a tourniquet.
Yes, there is. We aren't talking about cutting off all circulation. We're talking about occluding the primary outflow for a superficial vein, not whether or not an insignificant perforator is still allowing a microliter of blood through it.
 
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
I was told recently by an anesthesia resident that tapping the vein actually causes a histamine release and subsequent vasodilation. Thought it made sense...
 
I was told recently by an anesthesia resident that tapping the vein actually causes a histamine release and subsequent vasodilation. Thought it made sense...

I'm an anesthesia resident and that's what I was told by a senior resident during my PGY1 year. I later regurgitated it to an attending when he asked why I was tapping my pt's veins and he looked at me very disapprovingly. I now use the hand-waving mumbo-jumbo response and people seem to accept that just fine...