malaika, Thank you for your kind comments, and thank you for your offer to provide WikiPremed technical expertise and help in web development. My feeling is that some of the site is starting to get a bit out of date design-wise, so I am glad for your help. It's all hard coded using HTML and CSS on the front-end with PHP and MYSQL on the back-end. Some pages follow good modular design principles and some do not. It's a big, sprawling thing. I'm trying to get up to speed these days on some of the newer tools like JQUERY and AJAX that look like a lot of fun. As I bring new content and learning management services onto WikiPremed over the next few months the front-end design will also improve. Maybe I should break down and start using Dreamweaver. I believe WikiPremed can definitely be more accessible and intuitive. I really appreciate your offer of advice. I will definitely PM you in the future. Thank you!
Eptar I am glad you like the topic list. I should make the point that this list isn't based on any specific study of question frequency from actual exams. It comes out of a sense of what subject-matter is most relevant to the exam from years of teaching and my sense of AAMC's own pedagogical approach as conveyed in their public statements and practice materials. Also, a topic may have a higher place on the list as underpinnings than as a source for MCAT passages, so you can take it as you will. The relative weighting of topics is part of a new learning management system I'm building for WikiPremed, so I thought I would share and get feedback.
Speaking of feedback, I should mention that a person whose opinion I respect did tell me that they themselves would have ranked Fluid Mechanics and Electrochemistry as the two topics of highest importance in Physics and Chemistry respectively. I will probably elevate them in a future version of this list, though it is hard to see putting Electrochemistry above Solutions. It's also hard to split hairs. They are both essential.
And yes yes yes. I have heard that I talk too slowly on the videos. Unlike some of the other education videos out there, I recorded the WikiPremed videos in live teaching. This gives them a bit of a different feeling and pacing, and a lot of the talk is extemporaneous instead of scripted. However, while my speech moment to moment is extemporaneous, the overall structure of the program is intricately planned out. so I hope folks will have patience with the course, because I believe it will get you further than anything else out there, whether a live course or video. That being said, I can see the benefit of Youtube's HTML5 player, as you suggest, which would allow folks to speed up the videos at the browser level. I might definitely move them over to Youtube. Our current host Blip.tv is not the best fit, anyway, for a number of reasons. I might definitely do this, though as long as Youtube will let me upload longer format videos with no monetization, which I think is possible. Although I can understand how advertising could benefit WikiPremed's finances, I'm just not going to have ads. It's not going to happen. From my perspective as a teacher I feel like it's hard enough to get students into the right state of concentration without having to compete for attention with ads on my own site. I like the current way WikiPremed has of supporting itself, to produce and sell printed works derived from the larger project, printed works that are a good value proposition in themselves. Nothing is at cross purposes that way. As a business we're doing okay. It's a good product at a good price, so as long as we keep a focus on that I think we'll be okay without ads.
Anyway, thanks again for the kind comments and suggestions. Good luck everyone.