Will Trump win again???

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.
Get help with your application

Use all the free resources available to you from SDN: articles, guides, expert advising, forums discussions, and school research.

Status
Not open for further replies.
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad

I believe the threat from global warming is way overblown. The actual planet is warming very slowly and technology will solve the problem before 2100 when the world really is at risk.

At this time, the cost to abandon fossil fuel is way too high and the benefits minuscule because over 1 billion people need fossil fuel for basic needs.

I’m not saying we shouldn’t do anything at all but the Warren plan costs too much and delivers too little. We need 20-30 more years for the technology to develop so fossil fuels can truly be eliminated.

The liberals will likely blast me for this post but that’s my opinion and unlikely to be changed by the pseudo science of the world ending in 10 years. If the world ends soon it is because we blow it up (literally ) with a man made nuclear disaster.
 
Last edited:

I believe the threat from global warming is way overblown. The actual planet is warming very slowly and technology will solve the problem before 2100 when the world really is at risk.

At this time, the cost to abandon fossil fuel is way too high and the benefits minuscule because over 1 billion people need fossil fuel for basic needs.

I’m not saying we shouldn’t do anything at all but the Warren plan costs too much and delivers too little. We need 20-30 more years for the technology to develop so fossil fuels can truly be eliminated.

The liberals will likely blast me for this post but that’s my opinion and unlikely to be changed by the pseudo science of the world ending in 10 years. If the world ends soon it is because we blow it up (literally ) with a man made nuclear disaster.

I don't remember where I saw or read it, but it's my understanding that even if the US cuts to 0% carbon emissions, it doesn't change the trajectory of overall temperature change. Beyond that, we don't have the technology to actually do that as you've said. To my knowledge, the majority of the Democrat party is against nuclear energy, which is the most carbon friendly source of energy we currently can produce to scale. The Green New Deal isn't really a plan for climate change, which AOC's aide Chakrabarti has already admitted--it's about redistribution and restructuring of the economy.

There are some intriguing new technologies coming around. It's my opinion that science will get us out of this mess, but not in the form of carbon free emissions, but rather with geo-engineering.
 
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
Remember the ozone hole?

1) the ozone depletion was known to be caused by CFCs.

2) banning CFCs did wonders

3) the hole is coming back because China is illegally polluting.



This should be a testament to the fallacy of combating climate change if China doesn't participate (which they won't, it's a competitive advantage for them not to participate).
 
Warren’s support from white liberals could be enough to propel her to victory in Iowa or New Hampshire, helping her build momentum ahead of South Carolina, which is third in line to vote.
NBC’s Steve Kornacki noted over Twitter that in 2004 former Secretary of State John Kerry, who was also a senator from Massachusetts, was polling at 1 percent among black voters in the NBC-Journal poll before Iowa. Kerry won in Iowa and New Hampshire and then captured 34 percent of the black vote in South Carolina en route to the nomination and 56 percent support from black voters nationally.
“Black voters are pragmatic, and just like anyone else they want to be with a winner,” said one South Carolina Democrat, who said Warren’s crowds at rallies in the Palmetto State are among the most diverse in the field.
“Sen. Warren has a lot of momentum right now. You look at the field and where the energy is, it’s with her and she seems to be doing all the right things to capitalize on it, whether it’s her proposals, her message or connecting with people one-on-one. Any candidate willing to spend four hours taking selfies, that’s special for a lot of people.”

 
Warren’s support from white liberals could be enough to propel her to victory in Iowa or New Hampshire, helping her build momentum ahead of South Carolina, which is third in line to vote.
NBC’s Steve Kornacki noted over Twitter that in 2004 former Secretary of State John Kerry, who was also a senator from Massachusetts, was polling at 1 percent among black voters in the NBC-Journal poll before Iowa. Kerry won in Iowa and New Hampshire and then captured 34 percent of the black vote in South Carolina en route to the nomination and 56 percent support from black voters nationally.
“Black voters are pragmatic, and just like anyone else they want to be with a winner,” said one South Carolina Democrat, who said Warren’s crowds at rallies in the Palmetto State are among the most diverse in the field.
“Sen. Warren has a lot of momentum right now. You look at the field and where the energy is, it’s with her and she seems to be doing all the right things to capitalize on it, whether it’s her proposals, her message or connecting with people one-on-one. Any candidate willing to spend four hours taking selfies, that’s special for a lot of people.”


Ugh god I wish I could fast forward to 2020 already. Feel like I’ve been saying that since 2008.

Liz Warren: Another one with a grand plan.
 
Are we looking at a recession, oil price spike and war in the Middle East? Im getting early 2000’s flashbacks.

Recession is definitely on the table.

War - maybe a trade war but not a military conflict in the next 14mts. Not likely

More work, less pay, more socialism -
See that Iowa poll? That’s our future.
 
Trumps UN speech was incredible. None of his ad lib. None of his ego. He just let them have it.

On a side note, this house impeachment is just dumb. So a whistleblower is going to talk about a call they overheard... Trump is going to release the transcript... The transcript is going to show he didn't break the law... The transcript is going to tank Joe Biden's campaign and probably throw his son in jail as there is fire with that smoke. This is not going to pan out the way democrats hope.
 
Trumps UN speech was incredible. None of his ad lib. None of his ego. He just let them have it.

On a side note, this house impeachment is just dumb. So a whistleblower is going to talk about a call they overheard... Trump is going to release the transcript... The transcript is going to show he didn't break the law... The transcript is going to tank Joe Biden's campaign and probably throw his son in jail as there is fire with that smoke. This is not going to pan out the way democrats hope.

I’m still not clear on how this issue with the Ukraine is somehow a more impeachable offense than the collusion with Russia to manipulate the 2016 election.

Also, if he doesn’t get impeached. Liz Warren is gonna be a huge thorn in the side until 2020. They already have her pulling ahead in NH and Iowa.
 
This is going to help Warren get the nominee. Sadly, this seems to be what they want.

Exactly

She has the momentum and a following that’s hard to beat. I know it’s still early but a lot of things work to her advantage.

I’m too young toWarren Proof my portfolio so in lieu of that I’m warren proofing my career.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Beer drinking Elizabeth Warren is so connected to the young people

hqdefault.jpg
 
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
So now we finally are getting impeachment proceedings.

Stick a fork in it cause this administration is done
 
So now we finally are getting impeachment proceedings.

Stick a fork in it cause this administration is done

I doubt Trump could beat Warren anyway. Now, he has an excuse as to why he lost the 2020 election: Fake News plus Witch hunts. In the end, I doubt Trump really cares about serving another 4 years when he actually prefers to go back home and just play golf. His daughter will run Trump Enterprises with much greater name recognition than ever before.
 
IMHO, Warren will make Obama look like a capitalist. Every single one of her programs will involve higher taxes and/or bigger government.

I expect slow growth in the 1.5% GDP range during her administration after the recession hits in late 2020 (14-18 month recession then slow growth like the European Social Democracies she loves so much).
 
IMHO, Warren will make Obama look like a capitalist. Every single one of her programs will involve higher taxes and/or bigger government.

I expect slow growth in the 1.5% GDP range during her administration after the recession hits in late 2020 (14-18 month recession then slow growth like the European Social Democracies she loves so much).

It’ll be great. We will all have all the time in the world to contemplate in cafes drinking espresso while slowly slipping into poverty.
 
And here we go again...LOL...Russia collusion take 2

"A senior Trump administration official told Fox News late Tuesday that the administration will release a document showing the intelligence community inspector general found the whistleblower who leveled an explosive accusation against President Trump concerning his talks with Ukraine had “political bias” in favor of “a rival candidate” of the president."
 
Anyone see that trump increased overtime benefits for lower middle class workers for the first time since 2004? Nope, because despite happening yesterday, the news already pushed it to the bottom..
 
Pelosi will drag this out but nothing will come of it. The democrats in the house will stall and never vote on impeachment because voting either way will cause them to have to defend their vote in their next reelection. They don’t want the added risk, so nothing will ever happen. It’s all part of the political game.
 
Pretty damning content, huh?

The most damning content is how VP Biden bribed foreign leaders to drop an investigation into his son, who was given a sham position and was paid hundreds of thousands of dollars for political access to the Obama White House

But yeah, the Democrats are so right for calling Trump out on trying to get to the bottom of Biden's bribery.
 
“There’s a lot of talk about Biden’s son, that Biden stopped the prosecution, and a lot of people want to find out about that so whatever you can do with the Attorney General would be great. Biden went around bragging that he stopped the prosecution so if you can look into it … It sounds horrible to me,” Trump told Zelesky in the phone call, the transcript of which was published by CBS News.


LOL
 
The most damning content is how VP Biden bribed foreign leaders to drop an investigation into his son, who was given a sham position and was paid hundreds of thousands of dollars for political access to the Obama White House

But yeah, the Democrats are so right for calling Trump out on trying to get to the bottom of Biden's bribery.
“There’s a lot of talk about Biden’s son, that Biden stopped the prosecution, and a lot of people want to find out about that so whatever you can do with the Attorney General would be great. Biden went around bragging that he stopped the prosecution so if you can look into it … It sounds horrible to me,” Trump told Zelesky in the phone call, the transcript of which was published by CBS News.


LOL


Except there was no evidence Biden’s son was under investigation. There was no evidence he did anything nefarious. And the entire EU and the Ukrainian people wete also asking that this prosecutor be removed. So there are these inconvenient facts.
 
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
Except there was no evidence Biden’s son was under investigation. There was no evidence he did anything nefarious. And the entire EU and the Ukrainian people wete also asking that this prosecutor be removed. So there are these inconvenient facts.
Biden's son was paid $600,000 to advise an energy company, despite having no experience in energy, despite not speaking any local language, despite not having any other connection to the area. And Biden withheld funds from Ukraine until the prosecutor was fired.

Ok....
 
Except there was no evidence Biden’s son was under investigation. There was no evidence he did anything nefarious. And the entire EU and the Ukrainian people wete also asking that this prosecutor be removed. So there are these inconvenient facts.

Here's some light reading on Biden's son. He seems very qualified to help run an energy company.

 
My take,

(1) It doesn’t matter what Biden’s son did, the president cant withhold US govt funds set aside for Ukraine as a bargaining chip for a Biden investigation. This is the concern over quid pro quo.
(2) It does not look like there was quid pro quo with the transcript. Who knows what else has been said...
(3) All this is doing is highlighting Biden as a lifetime politician who helps his son get jobs he didn’t earn or deserve...the dude got kicked out of the military for a failed drug test. (See Chapelle Show “cocaine is a hell of a drug”) No way he’d be given a 6-figure job at an energy company in freakin Ukraine if his dad wasn’t VP. Nothing “illegal” about this, I’m sure all presidents/politicians do this too. Just makes Biden family seem shady and helps Warren
 
Here's some light reading on Biden's son. He seems very qualified to help run an energy company.



Knowles....as in the same one who called a young girl mentally ill? Wow, excellent source.
 
So now we finally are getting impeachment proceedings.

Stick a fork in it cause this administration is done

You are joking right? There is zero chance the Republican senate will push through an impeachment on a president with a 94% approval rating within the Republican Party over an innocuous phone call that the Democrats are blowing into hysterical proportions as usual. The Democrats know it won’t happen either, this is just more posturing and virtue signalling so they can show their supporters frothing at the mouth for Trump blood that they took a tough stance and left no holds barred in trying to force him out of office.

Not to mention the grotesque hypocrisy of the whole thing. The dems allege that it's an impeachable offence for a US politician to contact any foreign entity and ask for them to provide dirt on or investigate a political opponent even without a quid pro quo (aka even without offering a reward or threatening punitive action)... Well the transcript is out, and there was no quid pro quo. There was no threat of punitive action or offer of reward. He asked the Ukrainian PM to look into the whole scandal with Hunter Biden, which is ironically a situation that is far more egregious occurrence under the same political umbrella. So let's talk about the multiple, repeated occurrences of democrat hypocrisy in this whole farce:

1.) Rewind to 2014. Vice President Joe Biden is at the forefront of re-establishing US diplomatic efforts with Ukraine after the ousting of Russia-friendly Ukraine PM Yanukovych... around this same time period, Biden's son Hunter was conveniently hired by the Ukrainian gas company Burisma Holdings, quickly appointed as a board member with a 600k/yr salary despite having zero education or experience in the oil/gas industry, and despite having just been dishonorably discharged from the US military for substance abuse. Democrats said Hunter is a private citizen, so it's none of their business to get involved or investigate. Everyone shrugged it off and hand waved away any suggestion of suspicion. Fast forward to March 2016. Ukrainian top prosecutor begins investigating possible corruption in business dealings of Burisma Holdings... Joe Biden flies to Ukraine to meet with Ukrainian PM, openly admits on video to pressuring him to fire the prosecutor by threatening to withhold a billion dollars of US loans if he doesn't fire him. Direct quote on video from Biden: "Look I'm going to be leaving here in 6 hours. If he's not fired by then you're not getting the money". Everything gets buried by mainstream media, and hand waved away by democrats. No impropriety here, nothing sketchy about any of this. Move along everyone, democrats can do no wrong.



(Start at 0:40 to hear Biden brag about blackmailing Ukrainian gov't into firing the prosecutor investigating his son)

Fast forward to June 2019. A new Ukrainian PM is now in power who is hard on corruption. Donald Trump calls him up and asks him to look into the situation with Burisma and the Bidens to see if there was any impropriety that occurred there (sounds completely reasonable given how sketchy it looks). The full transcript of the call is released. There is no threat or offer of reward associated with the request. This is orders of magnitude less egregious than what Biden did, yet Biden did nothing wrong and Trump should be impeached!

2.) Hillary Clinton and the DNC paid Fusion GPS millions of dollars to obtain dirt from a foreign entity (Christopher Steele) on Donald Trump, an effort that would eventually culminate in what is now known as the "Trump Dossier". Again, literally engaging in worse behavior than what they are pretending to try to impeach Trump for now.

3.) Three democrat senators wrote to the Ukrainian prosecutor in May 2018, strongly urging their government to investigate alleged "Russia-Trump collusion" that was being looked at by Special Counsel Robert Mueller's probe and threatened a diplomatic fallout should they not fully cooperate with democrat and special counsel demands for a full open investigation.


Quote from the letter:
We have supported [the] capacity-building process and are disappointed that some in Kyiv appear to have cast aside these [democratic] principles to avoid the ire of President Trump. If these reports are true, we strongly urge you reverse course and halt any efforts to impede cooperation with this important investigation. This reported refusal to cooperate with the Mueller probe also sends a worrying signal — to the Ukrainian people as well as the international community — about your government’s commitment more broadly to support justice and the rule of law.
If you think it's fine that all of these occurrences get shoulder shrugged away while democrats simultaneously reach fever pitch in demanding impeachment while ringing their wrists on the senate floor for Trump merely cordially inviting the Ukrainian PM to investigate possible previous corruption in a phone call without threatening or offering any reward whatsoever... you might just be drinking from a trough of DNC koolaid with horse blinders on. There have been multiple occurrences of democrats engaging in similar behavior but on a far worse level, none of which seems to be "problematic" to them or their mainstream media partners. Rules are for thee, but not for me. Disingenuous hypocrites.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Anyone see that trump increased overtime benefits for lower middle class workers for the first time since 2004? Nope, because despite happening yesterday, the news already pushed it to the bottom..
lol thats a joke....he watered down the rules the democrats wanted. Republicans are only a party for the rich, much richer than anesthesiologists.
 
Republicans are only a party for the rich, much richer than anesthesiologists.

Funny considering most of the very richest people in the nation donate millions of dollars every year to prop up democrats. Soros, Zuckerberg, Sandberg, Buffet, Gates, Bloomberg, virtually every single celebrity and hollywood/entertainment industry tycoon, most tech billionaires and their legions of steadfast SJW millionaire employees... Hell, Bezos spent $250 million buying a left wing newspaper just so he can churn out DNC propaganda even faster. Guess the GOP must be doing a very poor job of courting the richest of the rich, who overwhelmingly seem to vote democrat... It's only the lesser rich working class professionals: doctors, lawyers, bankers, small business owners etc. who tend to vote GOP.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Funny considering most of the very richest people in the nation donate millions of dollars every year to prop up democrats. Soros, Zuckerberg, Sandberg, Buffet, Gates, Bloomberg, virtually every single celebrity and hollywood/entertainment industry tycoon, most tech billionaires and their legions of steadfast SJW millionaire employees... Hell, Bezos spent $250 million buying a left wing newspaper just so he can churn out DNC propaganda even faster. Guess the GOP must be doing a very poor job of courting the rich, who overwhelmingly seem to vote democrat...


It’s true the wealthy creative class leans democratic. They’re not doing so out of concern about their own financial security but because of their concern for larger problems. Most of the wealthiest have already pledged to give away most of their money. Ever ask yourself why these people who have built multigenerational fortunes, are often from humble backgrounds, and are not beholden to anyone tend to lean democratic?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
So now we finally are getting impeachment proceedings.

Stick a fork in it cause this administration is done
What proceedings? Nothing has happened.

Although you might think about sticking a fork in Joe Biden.
 
lol thats a joke....he watered down the rules the democrats wanted. Republicans are only a party for the rich, much richer than anesthesiologists.
China has been stealing manufacturing from the United States, and Trump is actually fighting to bring it back?
It’s true the wealthy creative class leans democratic. They’re not doing so out of concern about their own financial security but because of their concern for larger problems. Most of the wealthiest have already pledged to give away most of their money. Ever ask yourself why these people who have built multigenerational fortunes, are often from humble backgrounds, and are not beholden to anyone tend to lean democratic?
Virtue signaling.
 
It’s true the wealthy creative class leans democratic. They’re not doing so out of concern about their own financial security but because of their concern for larger problems. Most of the wealthiest have already pledged to give away most of their money. Ever ask yourself why these people who have built multigenerational fortunes, are often from humble backgrounds, and are not beholden to anyone tend to lean democratic?


Look, the road to hell is paved with good intentions. I grew up in an era where movies focused on good vs evil and good would always win. Our better nature, the better part of human kind, would prevail over our ancient, self preservation, greedy ways for lack of a better word. But, guess what? Those fantasy stories aren't true. Even if we want it to be true it isn't. Man is lazy. He/she/It is selfish and generally uninterested in the rest of society as a whole.

The super rich are trying to do the right thing but in the wrong way. Men/Women don't need to be fed they need to learn how to fish. The super rich from 100 years ago knew this fact so they donated to Universities, hospitals, research, etc.
I applaud the Bill Gates foundation and Warren Buffet for using their money to make this world a better place.

But, the government is NOT the instrument to bring about the change we need in the USA. More handouts, higher taxes, massive debt to 120% of GDP will destroy this nation. What is needed is less government in our lives. The super rich can sponsor free tuition for minorities across the USA. Better yet, use the internet to create the best home school education possible. One A++++ teacher can teach 10,0000, 100,0000 students online. Let the rich buy the poor computers and internet access at 1/10 the cost of failing school (Grade D of Grade F) education.

Innovation and technology is the path to a better society. Hard work and a chance to succeed is what the minority communities need to bridge the gap. Socialism despite all its glitter and allure is doomed to fail. So, lean as left as you want those policies simply don't work unless your goal is to bankrupt a nation while at the same time destroying the upper middle class.
 
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
I agree all citizens deserve a safety net. Just 10 years ago we were arguing over how big the safety net should be and whether healthcare should be included in that discussion.

That is not where the "left" is today. This "progressive" left has moved towards confiscation levels of individual wealth, rights and property. A "wealth tax" is not authorized by the Constitution. The idea where everything and anything that moves is taxed or outright prohibited is simply too far left to ignore.

These policies will destroy the economy and the people who vote for such politicians deserve such an outcome.
 
Sanders calls for the creation of a “national wealth registry,” as well as significant additional third party reporting requirements and necessitates that the IRS step up audits. The audit rate would be 100 percent for billionaires and 30 percent for wealth tax returns of the top 1 percent. There would also be a 40 percent to 60 percent exit tax.

 
When the Socialists start talking about a "registry" and a 60% exit tax that is code for they are coming for you next. That "wealth tax" won't stop at $16 million because the Socialists will want even more money to pay for all their "fairness" programs. Soon, the tax will be 8% aand the limit will be $250,000 for married couples. And that Exit Tax will likely increase to 80% which means if you or I want to leave this outright, socialist hell hole we won't be going with our hard earned money.

Socialism always starts with the noblest of intentions but ends in dismal failure.
 
They will take your guns, then your money and finally your liberty. The only chance we have is a Conservative SCOTUS to preserve and defend the Constitution and Bill of Rights. The liberals on the court will always vote to strip you of your God-given rights because God is dead and the constitution is a living document open to their interpretation.

1569446820337.png
 
No government ever voluntarily reduces itself in size. Government programs, once launched, never disappear. – Ronald Reagan

If you can cut the people off from their history, then they can be easily persuaded. – Karl Marx
 
Status
Not open for further replies.