Worry about your future? Read this.

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

Skip Intro

Registered User
20+ Year Member
Joined
Apr 30, 2002
Messages
3,378
Reaction score
1,001
Shortage of 200,000 Doctors Predicted in US by 2020

NEW YORK (Reuters Health) Nov 02 - Over the next two decades, a shortage of 200,000 physicians could occur in the US unless measures are taken to curb current economic and medical trends, according to a new report. Still, what should be done to remedy the problem remains unclear.

The report, which is authored by Dr. Richard A. Cooper, from the Medical College of Wisconsin in Milwaukee, appears in the November 2nd issue of the Annals of Internal Medicine.

For the last 2 decades, medical school and residency program policy decisions have been based on the premise that there would be an impending physician surplus, Dr. Cooper notes. Not only did this surplus never materialize, he adds, but there is increasing evidence that a shortage of clinicians is on the horizon.

Using a planning model that couples economic growth to health care spending and physician demand, Dr. Cooper was able to estimate the magnitude of a physician shortage or surplus in the coming decades.

His conclusion? There is a physician shortage that is just beginning now, but will likely increase dramatically in the next 20 years. By 2020, there could be a shortage of 200,000 doctors -- about 20% of the required workforce.

"The picture that emerges is uncomplicated and unambiguous. In simple numeric terms, the number of physicians is no longer keeping up with population growth," Dr. Cooper concludes.

In a related editorial Dr. Alan M. Garber, from the Stanford University School of Medicine in California, and Dr. Harold C. Sox, from the American College of Physicians in Philadelphia, write that "increasing the supply of physicians gradually, in small increments -- ones that would not require major new investments in capital or teaching personnel -- is a prudent strategy."

Ann Intern Med 2004;141:705-714,732-734.

Now, do you think they'll be able to add enough students to U.S. schools to make up this deficit? Hardly.

Again, more poor planning and false-commodity cartel B.S. offered up by the COGME in the 1990's. 🙄

Fortunately, they've pulled their heads out of their rectum and finally admitted how shortsighted they've been... and will try to rectify the problem!! In the meantime, don't expect them to close any doors to IMGs - a group that already makes up about 25% of the physician workforce in the U.S.!!!

-Skip
 
Skip Intro said:
Now, do you think they'll be able to add enough students to U.S. schools to make up this deficit? Hardly.

Again, more poor planning and false-commodity cartel B.S. offered up by the COGME in the 1990's. 🙄

Fortunately, they've pulled their heads out of their rectum and finally admitted how shortsighted they've been... and will try to rectify the problem!! In the meantime, don't expect them to close any doors to IMGs - a group that already makes up about 25% of the physician workforce in the U.S.!!!

-Skip

Skip,

I think that you are being an optimist.

We both know what states like California and Texas are doing to USIMGs. I would not be surprised to see more of them follow the Canadian "model" where despite a physician shortage and public outcry, residency spots are (more or less) limited to Canadian grads. Their solution seems to be to try and recruit specialists from third countries, but that does not seem to be working either.

What is to keep states from continuing to put barriers up to IMGs in the absence of national licensing standards? In my opinion, very little.

Miklos
 
Miklos said:
I think that you are being an optimist.

You can't argue with the numbers, my friend. Bad information and bad planning by COGME has lead to this, and they now have mud all over their faces. The "secret plan" of COGME and the AMA has always been to push D.O.'s and IMG's go into primary care. But, this cohort of doctors hasn't played nice like they were supposed to, and are specializing at the same rate as USMGs. Moral of the story: you can't force people to do anything. And, you certainly can't legislate them into taking positions that U.S. grads don't want.

What will inevitably happen with this problem is that they will recommend adding enough spots to U.S. schools over the next ten years, including increasing D.O. spots, that will start to make up the gap. Still, they will not be able to make up such a deficit in the next fifteen years. We'll continue to rely more and more on PA's and CRNP's as well.

It's a mess. The whole things a mess. And, as a fourth year, I can now - in some part - understand why people told me I was crazy to go into medicine, especially by choosing the route that I have. Now, as I'm getting interviews to U.S. medical school (University based) programs for residency, I realize that I've been crazy alright - crazy like a fox.

-Skip
 
They have been saying that for many years.

The shortage is mainly in Rural Areas and certain specialties.

Like surgery for now. Not many people are going into it right now. That will change as the trends change.

Primary care salaries need to rise and Insurance companies need to go away untill hell freezes over.

EH.
 
erichaj said:
They have been saying that for many years.

Well, that depends on what you mean by "many". If you look at the COGME reports from the mid 1990's, you'll see that they were consistently and blanketly predicting a surplus - regardless of geography. All of this at the same time that they were advocating increasing the PA/CRNP route.

It's all in there, if you know where to look and if you're interested in educating yourself.

-Skip
 
Top