- Joined
- May 24, 2002
- Messages
- 1,531
- Reaction score
- 0
Ok something has been bothering me for two days now, so tell me what you think.
Ok, so organic....So far to me it seems pretty easy(I keep up with the readings, pay close attention, etc) BUT out of 8 lecutures now my prof has only been there twice! He goes out of town a lot this Sept, so he says. Anyway, so we have had subs I guess you can call them the other 6 times. Now his syllabus states that he takes the exam questions from his "lecture notes" Well, what the subs have given us so far are sooo SIMPLISTIC compared to the text. One of the days he has been here I asked him about it, and he said he wasn't sure what the subs had covered but that we would only be affected for the first exam(well hello, every exam counts) He then asked me if I understood the text, I said yes pretty easily, but I was quick to point out that the text goes in far more detail that the notes we were receiving. He said he thinks I am in good shape. Ok as you can see, I am irritated about his absences but I don't know his situation so I will try and make the best of it...
But here is the part that is getting to me.... I started talking to a few people from my lecture who cannot follow ours(because of the above reasons they said) So, they told me they attend the later lecture as well(from a different prof) I can't go to that lecture because I have another class. I am getting so upset now about this. They all said they didn't understand the text though, which I find pretty easy. Do you think I am at a huge disadvantage now because I am not attending two lectures??? Why should I have to attend two lectures? Am I overreacting to my mind thinking they all have this huge advantage now??? I don't know this is really upsetting me and I don't know what to do about it.
Ok, so organic....So far to me it seems pretty easy(I keep up with the readings, pay close attention, etc) BUT out of 8 lecutures now my prof has only been there twice! He goes out of town a lot this Sept, so he says. Anyway, so we have had subs I guess you can call them the other 6 times. Now his syllabus states that he takes the exam questions from his "lecture notes" Well, what the subs have given us so far are sooo SIMPLISTIC compared to the text. One of the days he has been here I asked him about it, and he said he wasn't sure what the subs had covered but that we would only be affected for the first exam(well hello, every exam counts) He then asked me if I understood the text, I said yes pretty easily, but I was quick to point out that the text goes in far more detail that the notes we were receiving. He said he thinks I am in good shape. Ok as you can see, I am irritated about his absences but I don't know his situation so I will try and make the best of it...
But here is the part that is getting to me.... I started talking to a few people from my lecture who cannot follow ours(because of the above reasons they said) So, they told me they attend the later lecture as well(from a different prof) I can't go to that lecture because I have another class. I am getting so upset now about this. They all said they didn't understand the text though, which I find pretty easy. Do you think I am at a huge disadvantage now because I am not attending two lectures??? Why should I have to attend two lectures? Am I overreacting to my mind thinking they all have this huge advantage now??? I don't know this is really upsetting me and I don't know what to do about it.