I find it pretty hard to gather information on clinical sites, how many they have, what the competition is like, etc. Do you have any advice on how to get a better sense other than asking current students? I guess that's always a good question to ask during the interview process.
Yes. It's hard to gather information on clinical education. Plus once you've gathered that info, if you haven't been through the clinical process, it's tough to know how to analyze it. The info's worth can be different depending on each person's priorities in life -- if they wanna travel, if they wanna save money, if their only goal is to get a good CI.
Clinical education is complicated because clinic quality, clinician quality, and CI quality don't always trend together. You could have a site at Mayo Clinic. It's universally renowned. The CI there could be an excellent clinician, informed by evidence, focused on patient outcomes. But the CI is bad at transferring knowledge onto the SPT and/or supervising the SPT. Or any combo of good/bad things.
In my humble opinion, the only way to know if there are red flags with clin ed is to get your hands on a current full time clinical list for a current DPT class. Maybe others have suggestions but if the list has a lot of setting variety and most of the clinics are by your school or at least in large cities, it should be OK.
Some red flags are if there are a lot of SNFs, OP ortho chains, especially if they're out of town or out in the middle of nowhere, South Dakota. (That doesn't seem right to me because there are a lot of SNFs or OP ortho chains that would be fine with taking on a student.) Or maybe a considerable percentage of sites are a bad commute from the college or are totally out of the area. (This gets old fast.) Think realistically about what your priorities would be during these clinicals and see if their average list can meet your needs. God's speed!
PS I don't mean to bash on SNFs or chains because there are a lot of good therapists out there.