Is the Yale general surgery residency program really that malignant and why are so many residents always leaving the program?
I have friends there, and they're happy.
Malignancy is relative, but it didn't strike me as such when interviewing last year. I just thought New Haven is a small town, and their volume and complexity wasn't that great.
UW is wonderful and I've been incredibly happy. Of all the university programs in the country, I'd say we are about the most IMG-friendly. Our very charismatic chairman is himself Argentinian, and wants to recruit talent no matter from whence it springs. 5/7 or so go into research, but it's not required.
It's all a bit bittersweet. I've been so happy, and so impressed with the program, that I just hope I can stay on (I'm a 2 yr preliminary resident).
It's all a bit bittersweet. I've been so happy, and so impressed with the program, that I just hope I can stay on (I'm a 2 yr preliminary resident).
where you been? Old news
She did not apply for PRS, applied for general surgery, and late in the application process had some strong compelling person reason to go to Seattle (husband/fiancé?) but hadn't applied categorical to UW, so she applied as a prelim and ranked it over all her categorical spots. She matched there. (I feel weird telling someone else's story, but that's my understanding of it from what she's posted here.)What?! 😱
Yale surgery is not malignant in the slightest. In the surgery world, perceptions lag behind reality by at least 5 years. Yale used to have a malignant culture, lots of work hours violations, etc which is why they lost accred about 10 yrs ago. With a new chair comes a new culture. People at Yale are very happy.
Can't make any promises about medical student experiences. Yale medical students have it easier than any other students in the nation. They aren't evaluated by residents and really get to direct their own education - which is great for them. But bizarre to the residents, who mostly went to medical schools where they were expected...no, demanded, to be grunt work for the surgical team.
Yale surgery is not malignant in the slightest. In the surgery world, perceptions lag behind reality by at least 5 years. Yale used to have a malignant culture, lots of work hours violations, etc which is why they lost accred about 10 yrs ago. With a new chair comes a new culture. People at Yale are very happy.
Can't make any promises about medical student experiences. Yale medical students have it easier than any other students in the nation. They aren't evaluated by residents and really get to direct their own education - which is great for them. But bizarre to the residents, who mostly went to medical schools where they were expected...no, demanded, to be grunt work for the surgical team.
Chair forces EVERYONE with rare exception (eg if you have phd) to do 2 years off for research which is not cool. Most programs encourage it... And that's great... Here it's forced.
Brigham and Hopkins lab time is required.yeah, certainly the trend now with the "top" programs. just off the top of my head...
U michigan
Duke
MGH
Brigham (+/-)
U Pitt
Wash U
Hopkins (?)
UCSF
UCLA
where lab/research time is required
Interesting. I've wondered if the increase in "required" lab time is a response to more stringent 80-hour rules. In a way it forces you to remain in the call pool for an extra two years. I wonder how much of that "research time" involves trauma and ICU call days.
Yale gen surg is malignant - why do you think no Yale med student would ever match in gen surg at Yale? People stay at Yale for just about every other residency program, but never gen surg.
Yale med students are evaluated by residents in every other 3rd year rotation (med, peds, ob, etc). Thankfully the gen surg attendings are aware that the gen surg residents aren't competent enough to evaluate the med students, so they don't.
Obviously if your idea of a good student is "grunt work for the surgical team" then you should not be playing a role in medical education. What a joker.