- Joined
- Dec 25, 2008
- Messages
- 7,644
- Reaction score
- 6,385
Okay, has anyone else ever gotten this comment?
I honestly don't understand it... I do have a lot of research experience, but that's because I can do it, I (alledgely) do it well, I feel that ALL my research experience has somehow made me a better researcher, psuedo-clinician, student, and TA, I want to be well prepared for graduate school, and I honestly ENJOY it.
It's not as if research is the only thing I do, either--I have clinical experience, teaching/TAing experience, related non-clinical volunteer work, non-related non-clinical volunteer work, I'm in a sorority, etc., so I'm really, really not sure what this comment means. I asked for clarification and didn't really get any, asked if it was related to the quality of my work and was told no, so... Any thoughts?
Is there a thing as "too much" research experience?
I honestly don't understand it... I do have a lot of research experience, but that's because I can do it, I (alledgely) do it well, I feel that ALL my research experience has somehow made me a better researcher, psuedo-clinician, student, and TA, I want to be well prepared for graduate school, and I honestly ENJOY it.
It's not as if research is the only thing I do, either--I have clinical experience, teaching/TAing experience, related non-clinical volunteer work, non-related non-clinical volunteer work, I'm in a sorority, etc., so I'm really, really not sure what this comment means. I asked for clarification and didn't really get any, asked if it was related to the quality of my work and was told no, so... Any thoughts?
Is there a thing as "too much" research experience?