Your high-yield study techniques

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

PapaDeath

Full Member
10+ Year Member
15+ Year Member
Joined
Feb 27, 2007
Messages
19
Reaction score
1
Hey all,

In most all of my upper-level science classes, I've been able to pull off A's. However, I am still left feeling that the way in which I make the grade is quite inefficient. I don't think it would work for medical school due to the sheer volume of material that is presented to medical students (4-7 hours of lecture a day?).

My current process for every class is the following:

Step 1. Attend lecture and take clear notes. Pouring all my energy into soaking up every important piece of information straight from the professor's mouth is key, for me.

--Problem 1: After my longer lectures of 1.25 - 2 hours, my mind is exhausted from concentrating so hard. But, my notes are good. However, I can't imagine maintaining this level of attentiveness for the amount of time that lectures are given in medical school.

Step 2. After coming home or going to the library, I recopy/update/fill-in notes (within 24 hours) to the point where they become a very condensed and easy to follow study guide. This takes quite a bit of time up front, but it leaves me with an amazing amount of retained knowledge for the exam. My motto is "internalize everything," meaning that I almost never study from primary figures or primary lecture slides after the study guide is completed. Everything is put into my own words in my text file (which grows with each lecture). Additionally, if the class is problem-oriented (such as physics or chemistry), I will do problems as the professor recommends. Nothing too special there.

--Problem 2: This note recopying phase must take me anywhere from 1.5 to 4 times the length of the lecture itself. I do like the amount of knowledge and security I gain from making such thorough study guides, but I feel it would be extremely inefficient in medical school, where time is a valuable commodity. It would probably take me 5-6 hours just to do two medical school lectures when I still have two more to do before the day is out. At that rate, I'd have about 1-2 hours left for sleep each day. Ouch.

Step 3. The best part is that once the above two steps are completed, I almost never study for the test until the day before. Just one day of intense studying will refresh almost everything I heard in lecture for the past month or two. I think the real reason this works, though, is simply because the volume of material in undergrad just isn't THAT much.

So yeah, I made this thread because I feel that although my study methods work for undergrad, they are taking me in the wrong direction for medical school preparation. I have a horrible time reading textbooks and rarely do. I've gotten by all this way just by listening to professors in class and reading a few pages only when I have to. I hear in medical school it is important to be able to learn from textbooks and study material independently and that lecture is, many times, worthless. After all, learning independently is what a medical student/physician must ultimately do, especially after the first two years of medical school. If this is the case, my study strategy would experience a severe crash landing.

To remedy the situation, I'm using one of my classes as a guinea pig and trying to get myself to study from primary lecture slides and the textbook. More of a "hands off " approach since I'm just reading with minimal writing or highlighting or notetaking. I'm just not sure how to do this efficiently, though. I keep wanting to go back and make study guides because I'm afraid I'll miss something.

My questions to you:
-What is your system of studying?
-Do you read textbooks a lot instead of relying on the professor? Do they become easier to read after awhile?
-How do you keep track of information read in textbooks without excessive highlighting or notetaking? Do you just read sections/chapters over and over until it sticks?
-For current med students, how do you study the massive volume of material?
-Any other tips (pre-med or current med students)?

Once again, efficiency is my goal. I don't mind putting the time in, but there's got to be a better way to internalize loads of information. Thanks to all.
 
My highest yield technique consists of skipping class and listening/studying the lecture material from home. Saves time, petro and sanity.
 
My highest yield technique consists of skipping class and listening/studying the lecture material from home. Saves time, petro and sanity.

I second this. Lecture is a huge waste of time for me. It usually consists of professors saying something wrong and correcting themselves 5 million times, inevitably confusing the class.

I learn much better on my own.
 
My study technique: Read over powerpoints and memorize. Read over lecture notes I take.
 
I used to make study guides, but instead from the lectures I do it from the book. Lectures even in undergrad I feel are worthless 90% of the time unless you want entertainment.
 
Keep in mind, some profs may base their tests mostly off lecture material as mine did.
 
Hey all,

In most all of my upper-level science classes, I've been able to pull off A's. However, I am still left feeling that the way in which I make the grade is quite inefficient. I don't think it would work for medical school due to the sheer volume of material that is presented to medical students (4-7 hours of lecture a day?).

My current process for every class is the following:

Step 1. Attend lecture and take clear notes. Pouring all my energy into soaking up every important piece of information straight from the professor's mouth is key, for me.

--Problem 1: After my longer lectures of 1.25 - 2 hours, my mind is exhausted from concentrating so hard. But, my notes are good. However, I can't imagine maintaining this level of attentiveness for the amount of time that lectures are given in medical school.

Step 2. After coming home or going to the library, I recopy/update/fill-in notes (within 24 hours) to the point where they become a very condensed and easy to follow study guide. This takes quite a bit of time up front, but it leaves me with an amazing amount of retained knowledge for the exam. My motto is "internalize everything," meaning that I almost never study from primary figures or primary lecture slides after the study guide is completed. Everything is put into my own words in my text file (which grows with each lecture). Additionally, if the class is problem-oriented (such as physics or chemistry), I will do problems as the professor recommends. Nothing too special there.

--Problem 2: This note recopying phase must take me anywhere from 1.5 to 4 times the length of the lecture itself. I do like the amount of knowledge and security I gain from making such thorough study guides, but I feel it would be extremely inefficient in medical school, where time is a valuable commodity. It would probably take me 5-6 hours just to do two medical school lectures when I still have two more to do before the day is out. At that rate, I'd have about 1-2 hours left for sleep each day. Ouch.

Step 3. The best part is that once the above two steps are completed, I almost never study for the test until the day before. Just one day of intense studying will refresh almost everything I heard in lecture for the past month or two. I think the real reason this works, though, is simply because the volume of material in undergrad just isn't THAT much.

So yeah, I made this thread because I feel that although my study methods work for undergrad, they are taking me in the wrong direction for medical school preparation. I have a horrible time reading textbooks and rarely do. I've gotten by all this way just by listening to professors in class and reading a few pages only when I have to. I hear in medical school it is important to be able to learn from textbooks and study material independently and that lecture is, many times, worthless. After all, learning independently is what a medical student/physician must ultimately do, especially after the first two years of medical school. If this is the case, my study strategy would experience a severe crash landing.

To remedy the situation, I'm using one of my classes as a guinea pig and trying to get myself to study from primary lecture slides and the textbook. More of a "hands off " approach since I'm just reading with minimal writing or highlighting or notetaking. I'm just not sure how to do this efficiently, though. I keep wanting to go back and make study guides because I'm afraid I'll miss something.

My questions to you:
-What is your system of studying?
-Do you read textbooks a lot instead of relying on the professor? Do they become easier to read after awhile?
-How do you keep track of information read in textbooks without excessive highlighting or notetaking? Do you just read sections/chapters over and over until it sticks?
-For current med students, how do you study the massive volume of material?
-Any other tips (pre-med or current med students)?

Once again, efficiency is my goal. I don't mind putting the time in, but there's got to be a better way to internalize loads of information. Thanks to all.


highlighting.
 
I more of a learn by osmosis kind of guy

1. open to section you are learning about
2. lay your head on the page
3. sleep
4. repeat step 3 as often as needed to ensure all material is absorbed

hope this helps 🙂
 
I more of a learn by osmosis kind of guy

1. open to section you are learning about
2. lay your head on the page
3. sleep
4. repeat step 3 as often as needed to ensure all material is absorbed

hope this helps 🙂

Does it matter which side of the head? I've always been using my left side, but it doesn't seem to work out. :laugh:

For Bio
1. Reading slides/class notes
2. Clarifying notes/slides not understood by reading in book / asking questions
3. Use questions in books/old tests/ old quizzes to self-test myself.
Repeat until knowledge download complete!

For more application-based classes (Physics, Math, Chem)
3, 1, 2.

All of this really depends on the class, too. I can't do this for my computer engineering class... just gotta write lots of code, and keep up with homework.
 
I go to lecture since the powerpoints always have blanks (to encourage people to go), I record the lectures in case I have a question later I can just listen to it, and I make flashcards. I go over a few cards a day and then again before the exam. I can use an entire package of new flashcards for half an exam but I only need to see them a couple times to keep them burned in my memory for a long time. I also tutor people which also etches it in my mind. The cards take me about 20 minutes to do after each lecture.
 
go to class just to see if the proff mentions anything important not on the provided online slides, borrow notes from friends, find an empty room start lecturing to yourself or an imaginary friend...it works
 
You are losing sooo much time by recopying notes you already have...It really seems like that's where you're losing your efficiency. You can review your class notes by highlighting or underlining your second time through - that seems to work for me and takes a lot less time than rewriting it.

I personally disagree with a bunch of these people - I think going to lecture is one of the easiest/most high yield ways to study, especially because you find out what part of the material is most important to focus on for exams by what the prof emphasizes.
 
I second this. Lecture is a huge waste of time for me. It usually consists of professors saying something wrong and correcting themselves 5 million times, inevitably confusing the class.

I learn much better on my own.

This is not always the case. For me, rarely. Good professors make very few mistakes and often give information that is not contained in the book, such as cutting edge research (especially the one they are working on). So going to lecture can be important.

OP, if you're trying to skip lectures, you must first evaluate your teachers on individual basis. Ask around, but better yet, go to class for the first few weeks and you will have a good idea whether attending lecture is worth anything.

I would say that the best way to save time is to stop wasting your time relistening to lectures or recopying notes. The highest yield results when you read the chapter before the lecture, write down your own notes, and then go to lecture. Anything that the teacher says from the book, you'll know - no need to take notes. Anything that you don't know, you write down. You will end up with your notes + about 10% of what the teacher says. This is the best strategy. Everything else is just details and will vary from one person to the next depending on personality.
 
This is not always the case. For me, rarely. Good professors make very few mistakes and often give information that is not contained in the book, such as cutting edge research (especially the one they are working on). So going to lecture can be important.

OP, if you're trying to skip lectures, you must first evaluate your teachers on individual basis. Ask around, but better yet, go to class for the first few weeks and you will have a good idea whether attending lecture is worth anything.

I would say that the best way to save time is to stop wasting your time relistening to lectures or recopying notes. The highest yield results when you read the chapter before the lecture, write down your own notes, and then go to lecture. Anything that the teacher says from the book, you'll know - no need to take notes. Anything that you don't know, you write down. You will end up with your notes + about 10% of what the teacher says. This is the best strategy. Everything else is just details and will vary from one person to the next depending on personality.

Agreed. I find I get the most out of lectures by reading the text before lecture, reviewing the handouts before lecture, and making notations of concepts that are not yet clear and/or questions I have. This way lecture can serve as a semi-review of material you get while enabling you to fill in the question-gaps the first time around.

However, I have no basis on how this strategy would hold up in medical school. I have a few friends who are 2nd-years and I'm quite confident they would chuckle at the notion of having time to read the material beforehand.
 
Thanks for all the great ideas so far. I like the suggestions of reading & highlighting beforehand and using the lecture/lecture slides/lecture notes as a review. Since a lot of success in med school (I've heard) is based on your ability to learn independently (hence the importance of VR on the MCAT), this study method would only reinforce that. Circadian Squid mentioned a good point in that this may not be feasible for the busy med student. However, if you were to make it your #1 priority to learn the material at all costs before lecture, even in medical school, you'd probably save yourself a buttload of frustration. The few hours of sleep you lose exposing yourself to new material would likely be made up for.

A current/former medical student can probably tell us if this would be an effective way to study...
 
Last edited:
everything I heard in lecture for the past month or two.
I have a horrible time reading textbooks and rarely do. I've gotten by all this way just by listening to professors in class and reading a few pages only when I have to. afraid I'll miss something.

Ok I admit I skimmed your post the first time and just read it more thoroughly. I'm not in med school yet but hopefully this helps a little.

Sounds like you are an audio learner and you are confusing "independent" learning with visual learning style. Neither learning style is more correct than the other. Coming from a kinesthetic/visual learner I can say there are advantages in your learning style you may be over looking, as well as why trying to adapt to another learning style is probably the most inefficient task of all. IMO the most efficient way for you to study would be to go to a school that records lectures in mp3 or video format. Compressing those lectures onto your ipod so you could listen to it in the car, at the gym might help save time, as well as going to study groups where you can listen to your classmates explain things in a slightly different way. I don't learn at all in lecture which makes class where attendance is taken to be a real PITA. Maybe this could be an advantage if you go to a school with PBL?

Problem 2: This note recopying phase must take me anywhere from 1.5 to 4 times the length of the lecture itself. I do like the amount of knowledge and security I gain from making such thorough study guides, but I feel it would be extremely inefficient in medical school, where time is a valuable commodity.
The last thing I can think of is to buy some good review books and annotate those, rather than recopying/condesning notes. It's not clear if you are actually recopying notes or just condesning them, I do the latter in memorization-based classes and it works really well. You want to know ONE source and know it COLD. (sorry if this seems obvious)

good luck!
 
Ok I admit I skimmed your post the first time and just read it more thoroughly. I'm not in med school yet but hopefully this helps a little.

Sounds like you are an audio learner and you are confusing "independent" learning with visual learning style. Neither learning style is more correct than the other. Coming from a kinesthetic/visual learner I can say there are advantages in your learning style you may be over looking, as well as why trying to adapt to another learning style is probably the most inefficient task of all. IMO the most efficient way for you to study would be to go to a school that records lectures in mp3 or video format. Compressing those lectures onto your ipod so you could listen to it in the car, at the gym might help save time, as well as going to study groups where you can listen to your classmates explain things in a slightly different way. I don't learn at all in lecture which makes class where attendance is taken to be a real PITA. Maybe this could be an advantage if you go to a school with PBL?

The last thing I can think of is to buy some good review books and annotate those, rather than recopying/condesning notes. It's not clear if you are actually recopying notes or just condesning them, I do the latter in memorization-based classes and it works really well. You want to know ONE source and know it COLD. (sorry if this seems obvious)

good luck!

I totally agree with much of what you said. I've always picked "audio learner" if asked about learning style. I have most likely always labeled the visual learning style as "independent" because it, to me, is a very autonomous way of learning. Medicine also seems to be a very "visual" profession. I sometimes feel boxed in as an audio learner, since it takes a lecture or someone else to learn. Going to a school that records lectures would definitely be a huge plus (since I wouldn't have to go to class to record the lecture and double my lecture listening time). I could also try recording myself talking through notes and lecture slides -- but once again that may take a lot of time. I'll look into study techniques for audio learners.

As for my notes, you are right in that they're not just copies of lecture notes but very condensed and well-written guides. That one source for all your exam needs is a huge convenience. However, as mentioned, converting all that stuff into a very condensed form is extremely time consuming.

I'm trying to make the transition to the visual learning style mainly because I have two years to go. I think forcing it for a little while may open up some new doors or at least partially resonate with my existing method of studying. I'll never know until I try it for a few months.

Thanks for the observation, your post really hit a few things home.
 
glad it helped!
I should have written "auditory" learner, not audio learner. You might get better search results from this 🙂
 
Hahah yeah I was just googling and saw auditory all over the place instead of audio. Should have remembered the correct term myself, doh!
 
Top