Your most hated secondary questions!

Started by aegistitan
This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.
Get help with your application

Use all the free resources available to you from SDN: articles, guides, expert advising, forums discussions, and school research.

Browse articles Compare schools My application plan Read Interview Feedback
Practice for interviews Ask an Advisor
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
Spinach Dip said:
I'm in the same boat.

Some parts of my app are 5-star amazing, while others make me want to puke. This upcoming cycle is going to be an adventure, thats for sure.
Click to expand...
Good luck, I knew the application process was going to be difficult but I was not prepared for the amount of mental torment that is the med school admissions process. I cant even imagine how it must be for those that done get in.


Sent from my iPhone
 
Cyberdyne 101 said:
That's an excellent way of putting it. It does necessitate reflection and self-awareness. If anything, thinking about this should be beneficial to everyone.

@womanofscience, I'm happy your interview trail was filled with diversity. It makes me, as a non-trad (with a unique story), feel better about this process.
Click to expand...

i was happy to see it too. In fact, I think there was one interview where I heard someone say they gave birth two weeks prior...wow!

I am looking forward to your application cycle and I am rooting for you!
 
aegistitan said:
Hmm... I'm a cis-gendered heterosexual 1st generation asian immigrant (my parents immigrated here) traditional applicant that grew up pretty privileged. I think I just described half of the application pool. I'm gonna have to think about this question for a while I guess, I suppose it is much easier for non trads to write about this question.
Click to expand...

hmm, do you have any special interests that may set you apart from other applicants? just think of things that you may bring to the table that others may not. For example, a friend wrote about his interest and expertise in computers and how that will benefit him.

Good luck!
 
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
womanofscience said:
i was happy to see it too. In fact, I think there was one interview where I heard someone say they gave birth two weeks prior...wow!

I am looking forward to your application cycle and I am rooting for you!
Click to expand...
Thank you!!!
article-danes-0923.jpg
 
ski89 said:
Good luck, I knew the application process was going to be difficult but I was not prepared for the amount of mental torment that is the med school admissions process. I cant even imagine how it must be for those that done get in.
Click to expand...
Dude, yes. My application cycle about killed me with stress, especially since I was quitting a well-paying job in order to even apply, with no guarantee that I would get accepted. What a nightmare.
 
beachside said:
Dude, yes. My application cycle about killed me with stress, especially since I was quitting a well-paying job in order to even apply, with no guarantee that I would get accepted. What a nightmare.
Click to expand...
Congrats! You survived the Danger Zone! I'm glad it worked out for you!
*ok, maybe I should cool it with the Top Gun references :laugh:
 
amazing tekkers said:
"In providing patient care, should physicians maintain emotional distance or empathize with patients’ emotional states? As a physician, how would you deal with your own emotions?"
good luck
Click to expand...
That question is setting you up for failure. You say you would keep an emotional distance, they think you're cold and insensitive. You say you empathize with patients, they figure you're too emotionally involved.
 
RJGOP said:
That question is setting you up for failure. You say you would keep an emotional distance, they think you're cold and insensitive. You say you empathize with patients, they figure you're too emotionally involved.
Click to expand...
This is seems like another admissions paradox. I'd be interested to see how people answer this. Is it appropriate to take a middle ground approach?
 
Cyberdyne 101 said:
This is seems like another admissions paradox. I'd be interested to see how people answer this. Is it appropriate to take a middle ground approach?
Click to expand...
I'm honestly not a fan of a middle ground stance. However, if I were posed with this question, I would stay fairly neutral, or explain how your emotions may vary but they would always be appropriate, or something along those lines.
 
RJGOP said:
I'm honestly not a fan of a middle ground stance. However, if I were posed with this question, I would stay fairly neutral, or explain how your emotions may vary but they would always be appropriate, or something along those lines.
Click to expand...
I guess a lot of this comes down to saying the right stuff and keeping your composure. Also, people can usually figure out when someone actually cares and is invested in fixing their problem. You don't have to shed tears to demonstrate this. Although, in some cases, the tears may actually come after the shift is over.
 
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
Cyberdyne 101 said:
I guess a lot of this comes down to saying the right stuff and keeping your composure. Also, people can usually figure out when someone actually cares and is invested in fixing their problem. You don't have to shed tears to demonstrate this. Although, in some cases, the tears may actually come after the shift is over.
Click to expand...

I can give you a little insight into this question, as most can guess, I have been a paramedic for a while, both pre-hospital and now in hospital. When I am with a patient, they get my full undivided attention, when they are telling me their history, I am actively listening and responding with questions as necessary to gain insight into the problem. I am empathetic, understanding, and compassionate, I am their shoulder to lean on. At the same time, I am formulating a working clinical impression, and what I need to do as a clinician. Its a balancing act, sometimes there are going to be patients that strike a nerve, especially when dealing with kids, even more specifically kids that have been abused. It takes everything I have to remain neutral and understanding when all I want to do is leave and have alone time. I have absolutely had times where it was too much, this is where CISD and having a peer counselor to talk to is important. Especially when you have to tell a family that despite everything you did, you couldn't save a family member. Some of this stuff will stick with you the rest of your life. The thing to remember through the whole thing though, we are their knight, the person with the answers, and it takes time to develop the ability to remain composed and professional in the face of massive emotional stress. But in order to be that person they feel like they can turn to, you have to learn how to be emotionally invested to an extent, but still remain unbiased and neutral when proper and necessary.

With that long winded response in mind, taking the middle ground for the right reasons is not a wrong response.Be emotionally accepting and compassionate, but remain professional enough to be able to operate as a clinician. It takes time to develop that balance, but is so very important in order to be the best you can.
 
beachside said:
Write thoughtful responses. If you don't, you'll regret it while you're sitting at home in December with nothing but time and no interview. Not surprising in retrospect, but almost all (80%) of my interviews were to the schools that I applied to last. Why? I'd become much better at writing secondary essays by then, and generally was no longer in a rush.
Click to expand...
In contrast, I felt burnt out as I was reaching the end of my stack of secondaries.
Certainly, my first ones were the ones that were seemingly better written (got interviews from those).
 
Under "Similar Threads" at the bottom of this page, there are some really, really similar threads from previous years.

Interestingly, check out the frustration in the first post from "Share your most irritating secondary question" from 2008 (rage-bold in the original):
inhiding said:
I think USC officially wins the "annoying questions of the year" award.

Essays 2 + 3: How do my unique qualilties and abilities contribute to (2) the educational environment at Keck and (3) the diversity of the entering class --> THESE ESSAY QUESTIONS ARE EXACTLY THE SAME, AT LEAST FOR ME THEY ARE.

Essay 5:
Briefly describe your most relevant extra-curricular activites [sic] (volunteer, research,serving disadvantaged or underserved populations, etc...) related to your interest in medicine. --> DO YOU THINK I LEFT THIS OFF OF MY AMCAS APPLICATION SOMEHOW? ARE YOUR APPLICANTS EXCEPTIONALLY STUPID OR IS IT JUST THE ESSAY READERS WHO CAN'T FIGURE OUT WHAT'S GOING ON?..
Click to expand...
And check out USC's secondary from 2014 in this thread:
onceawolverine said:
Most Entertaining Secondary: USC-Keck. Gems include: What is the most fun you’ve had in the last year? If you could give yourself a nickname, what would it be?
Click to expand...
Yes! Maybe that admissions office listened to their applicants and had a change of perspective. (Or a change of regime.)
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

P
Secondary Review!
Replies
5
Views
831
Mr.Smile12
Mr.Smile12
T
Most Meaningful Experience
Replies
1
Views
507
Mr.Smile12
Mr.Smile12
P
Adversity Secondary Idea
Replies
2
Views
740
MedSchoolPilot
MedSchoolPilot
Buggy1324
Adversity Secondary Prompt
Replies
7
Views
1K
polymerization
polymerization
addiiieee
  • Question Question
Secondary Essay Mistakes
Replies
4
Views
849
addiiieee
addiiieee