- Joined
- Mar 28, 2014
- Messages
- 129
- Reaction score
- 36
What are the differences in responsibilities between the Dean of Admissions vs. Director of Admissions?
Haha, that is pretty awful. What are some of the best you've heard? Or at least, have resonated with you?One of the worst answers I ever got was "because I want to be respected"
Hello Hushcom, I've got a couple questions:
1. I'm a non-traditional student who originally intended to pursue a PhD and quickly realized I want to become a physician instead. Still, I am passionate about my research and I hope to maintain a strong translational research focus throughout my career in addition to clinical work. This is the thesis of my personal statement, but I'm concerned- would it be viewed negatively by schools with more of a primary-care aim (like most of my state schools)?
2. I had a weak undergraduate GPA (cumulative: 3.49, science: 3.4), and decided to complete a physiology master's program at a top university before applying to PhD programs. I actually substituted a couple of the department's PhD classes in place of the MS classes to get them out of the way, in case I would have remained at the same school. Academically, I did very well (3.92), but ultimately decided I wanted to become a MD instead. My MCAT score is a 36, and I have 1 first author publication, six or seven abstracts/posters/conferences, satisfactory volunteering, and I'm going to be the first author on a chapter in a forthcoming tissue engineering textbook.
I'm finding a lot of discrepant information regarding how M.S. GPAs are weighted by ADCOMs against undergrad GPAs, and my situation is a bit different than most given my additional PhD classwork. Could you address how you would treat my statistics were my application to land in your hands? Would you recommend that I focus my application primarily toward low, mid, or high-ranked schools?
Many thanks!
Can you comment on responses you have liked/appreciated vs. disliked/don't ever want to hear, to the interview question "Why do you want to be a doctor?"
Hello hushcom,
I would like to ask you a few questions and I hope you could reply to them since all the random input I get from other people is nowhere compared to what I would get from an adcom.
My situation is unique in the sense that I am an international student who transferred to a public university here in my junior year. My school transferred all my credits from my previous school which allowed me to graduate on time.
I would have preferred to take a couple more semesters and take the pre-requisites but financial difficulties didn't make it any easier so my parents rushed me to graduate.
Instead of going back home and getting married as my family wished I fought to stay here and got a job and I am waiting for a green card which I hope to get in the next year.
Until then I was hoping I could take my pre-requisites at a Community College? There is no way I can pay oos tuition at a 4-year school. I am not eligible for loans or scholarships.
My options are very limited and life is bizarre for a woman in a different country without money or a house or familial support. I am trying to make it work with ultimately hoping to get into medical school. But every step I take forward I am set two steps backwards by unforeseen circumstances. All these circumstances have obviously affected my grades. They have fallen from a 3.6 in freshmen and sophomore year to an unspeakable 3.0 in my junior and senior year. And the grades aren't averaged since they are from two different countries.
I am just hoping to go to a community college and setting my GPA straight and acing MCAT.I know I can do it but I don't know if it's worth it if eventually community courses will shed a negative light on my application.
I don't really have many extra-curricular activities apart from research experience of 1.5 years , a few college jobs and some random volunteering efforts.. It gets frustrating to have all doors closed on you because of a stupid visa but I just want to know if I am headed in direction that is not doomed to end in a giant NO from adcoms.
It would mean a lot more since your advice will have a real insight in the minds of adcoms.
So should I take courses at a community college given the situation I am in?
Also how do adcoms view such events in an applicant's life?
As an adcom would you suggest anything that can benefit my application?
I couldn't be more thankful.
What are the differences in responsibilities between the Dean of Admissions vs. Director of Admissions?
Hello. First off, thank you for your time. I just have a quick question concerning inclusion of ethnic background.
My situation is a bit unusual. I was born in South Asia, but I was raised in South America (Peru, to be specific). I spent my entire childhood there before moving to the United States and despite not being Peruvian by birth, I identify most with its culture. I speak Spanish and my "native" language fluently, although my Spanish is much more advanced. What would be the best way to put my ethnicity down?I know the application says to put the one you "identify with the most", but I want to make sure including Peru won't be an issue because I wasn't actually born there.
What are your thoughts on Caribbean schools?
Are you going on a permanent or temporary hiatus?
Never an unequivocally good idea, but at one point in time they were a viable option for those who had the brains and work ethic to succeed in medical school but lacked the application. Non-traditional students with lousy undergraduate careers, or undergrads with strong upward trends but lousy cGPA's would fall into this category. With the impending squeeze on the number of graduates relative to the number of open residency positions, however, those days are about to be history. I think one or two of the bigger Caribbean schools still has clerkship/residency pull in the NYC area, but outside of that the competition for GME is going to get worse and worse. I predict the number of Ross/SGU/AUC graduates with no residency and therefore no career options is going to increase in coming years. Buyer beware.
Hi hushcom,
I am a non-trad applicant who has taken the MCAT a total of 3 times over the past four years. My first two scores taken in 2010 & in 2012 (both 21 - yikes!) were from when I was a naive pre-med who lacked the worth ethic to make decent grades and study effectively for the MCAT. I decided to switch to pre-med as a senior in college, and failed to see the reality of the challenges of "pre-med life" until much later.
For the past 2.5 yrs, I have worked as a Nutritionist (I majored in Nutritional Science) at a safety net clinic for underserved - predominately Hispanic/Latino - patients. I really enjoy working with the community that I serve, but feel limited in the ways I can make a difference in healthcare - I can't make the big dent that physicians have the privilege of making through their work. That's my motivation for becoming a doc.
I unsuccessfully applied to med school last cycle after scoring a 26 on my MCAT last year. I have a pretty meh GPAs - sGPA of 3.21 and GPA of 3.37 - closer to 3.6 each for the DO applications. I will be studying for yet another MCAT retake in late June. I have recognized my weaknesses and what improvements I can make in my studying habits, setting my sights on a 30+, since I cannot change my GPA. For one thing, I feel that I am more in tune with the realities of getting into medical school and the reality of how hard I will have to bust my ass when I become a medical student (I can't really know until I'm there, but I know for sure it won't be a breeze).
My question is: how can I convey all this in my application (i.e., my poor work ethic and
my naivety when it came to academics)? Say I do make a 31-35 on a retake. I hope that that number will get me through the screening process at the schools to which I apply. I am applying broadly and realistically, to mostly DO schools and a few MD schools. I am aware of the schools that recognize "reinvention", and I hope that those schools will place considerable weight on my 30+ MCAT. Thank you...
Most people post to the school specific discussions forums for "School X vs. School Y" threads. You'll probably get a lot more responses there!Hello everyone in this forum, and especially Hushcom,
I am trying to decide between University of South Carolina, Greenville, which has offered me almost a full ride (I'd pay about 5k a year) but is brand new (only two years old) and Washington University in St. Louis.
How important is the prestige of the medical school attended to residency programs?
If there is another page on SDN discussing this topic, please send me that way!
Thanks!
Is it rude or offensive to ask average step scores to adcoms when you are an accepted applicant to several schools and need time to decide one?
REPEAT NOTICE: As summer approaches I have decided to wind this thread down, at least in terms of my contributions. I will respond to all questions/inbox inquiries through Monday, May 12 before going on hiatus.
REPEAT NOTICE: As summer approaches I have decided to wind this thread down, at least in terms of my contributions. I will respond to all questions/inbox inquiries through Monday, May 12 before going on hiatus.
Can you shed light on what is happening right now in this phase of the application cycle? Surely it differs everywhere, but people are getting IIs at various times it seems like. What is really going on inside the black box? Is there an easy explanation as to how things go from us giving you our secondaries to that email with an II? Does the timing serve as an indicator of your interest (first of the pack vs. last of the pack)? Or are there other factors (people that review it take different times to review, etc.). Hopefully this makes sense... thank you!What say we revive this thread for a little while? Interview season is approaching and it's time to get psyched.
Can you shed light on what is happening right now in this phase of the application cycle? Surely it differs everywhere, but people are getting IIs at various times it seems like. What is really going on inside the black box? Is there an easy explanation as to how things go from us giving you our secondaries to that email with an II? Does the timing serve as an indicator of your interest (first of the pack vs. last of the pack)? Or are there other factors (people that review it take different times to review, etc.). Hopefully this makes sense... thank you!
Can you shed light on what is happening right now in this phase of the application cycle? Surely it differs everywhere, but people are getting IIs at various times it seems like. What is really going on inside the black box? Is there an easy explanation as to how things go from us giving you our secondaries to that email with an II? Does the timing serve as an indicator of your interest (first of the pack vs. last of the pack)? Or are there other factors (people that review it take different times to review, etc.). Hopefully this makes sense... thank you!
+1. Would like to know how adcoms decide what secondary gets reviewed first. seems like people that are complete at a later date than me are getting reviewed first while my app status remain motionless.
I just recently learned that women on average score 2 points lower on the MCAT. Does your admissions committee take this into account in any way? If so, how?
https://www.aamc.org/students/download/267622/data/mcatstudentselectionguide.pdfWhere did you hear this??
I just recently learned that women on average score 2 points lower on the MCAT. Does your admissions committee take this into account in any way? If so, how?
Just a question regarding gpa for a Canadian student. I saw a conversion table posted on premed101 for my school to American gpa (AMCAS?). Is that the gpa that schools I apply to will receive? How does the conversion work?
Thanks
@hushcom
I saw the question regarding "medical missions" and I read your answer saying that they're a dime a dozen and are generally looked at as just "fluff" for rich kids' applications. However, I'd like to ask a follow up question that's more specific to my situation.
I am the "VP of medicine" in the medical brigades club at my school, which means that I'm in charge of attaining all of the medications that we need to go on a medical mission to Honduras this summer. I also have the opportunity to become the president of the club starting in a few months, where I'll basically be in charge of all preparations for another medical mission to Honduras next summer (in charge of ~30-40 other students who will be going on the trip, hiring doctors and nurses, collecting medications, running fundraisers, preparing flights, etc). Furthermore, my trip won't be funded by rich parents, it's completely funded by fundraising throughout the year, personal donations from family friends, and a large grant from my school. While in Honduras, we'll treat about 900 people, and we take significant measures to ensure that the community doesn't become dependent on us and that our trip has long-lasting positive effects on the community.
I've really enjoyed my involvement so far, I'm confident that I'll enjoy my experience in Honduras, I think that I'll end up learning a lot (both as a result of having leadership roles as well as having interesting clinical experiences abroad), and I feel like I'm actually able to make a meaningful difference in many lives.
I'm just wondering if this will be considered "fluff" as well, or if it wold be taken more seriously than most other medical missions. I'm concerned that the time commitment that I'll have to make might not be worth the improvement to my application. How do you think this would be viewed by adcoms when I apply in a couple years?
The standard criticisms being what, exactly?How it is viewed will depend on how you explain it. I would include many of the details you listed above in the AMCAS description, although not so many that it comes off as defensive. You are still open to many of the standard criticisms of medical missions, though, so be ready.
The standard criticisms being what, exactly?
Do adcoms take into account the amount of time between a secondary being sent and it being returned? (I.e. does a response time of 2 weeks look like a lack of interest or responsibility?)
Obviously I understand that earlier is better anyways for purposes of rolling admissions. Thanks!
Do adcoms take into account the amount of time between a secondary being sent and it being returned? (I.e. does a response time of 2 weeks look like a lack of interest or responsibility?)
Obviously I understand that earlier is better anyways for purposes of rolling admissions. Thanks!
Ah, that makes sense (unfortunately). Is there a way that you recommend I frame the experience to display it in a better light? Also, are there any similar opportunities/organizations within America that you could recommend?The transience of the aid, the effort to help those outside the country when there are many in need inside our borders, that sort of thing. It can turn into an ethical quagmire pretty quickly if you pull a bad interviewer. I'm not saying I agree with those sentiments, but they exist.