BrainStormer
Full Member
- Joined
- May 18, 2023
- Messages
- 40
- Reaction score
- 9
I’m in a clinically oriented PhD program in the midst of my dissertation. I have my PI and 2 other committee members from my university working with me on this project. Ideally, my goal is to publish my dissertation, but I would like to reach out to my other faculty contacts from a research oriented PhD program for their contribution to the manuscript once it’s defended.
My committee members, including my PI, have done little to nothing for this project. I have received close to no comments on the entire literature review section, so it’s hard to gage if I’m actually doing this well or not. My other contacts from a different university (who have shown interest in my research) are willing to make revisions and contribute to the manuscript. They’re more research oriented than my committee and have extensive experience publishing and being on editorial boards for journals. The issue is authorship. How would I approach this without burning bridges with faculty from my university? Wouldn’t it be unethical to have my committee as 2nd, 3rd, and 4th author when the other university faculty members contributed more? If we decide authorship on the basis of the amount of work one puts in, the other faculty would most likely get bumped ahead of my committee. How do I gage this as a graduate student? My other option is to just not have any other faculty outside of my university contribute to my work to avoid this issue in general, but I don’t think that I’m receiving proper support from my committee for this to be publishable, which is why I want to branch out.
Authorship seems so political at times…. Any advice welcomed!
My committee members, including my PI, have done little to nothing for this project. I have received close to no comments on the entire literature review section, so it’s hard to gage if I’m actually doing this well or not. My other contacts from a different university (who have shown interest in my research) are willing to make revisions and contribute to the manuscript. They’re more research oriented than my committee and have extensive experience publishing and being on editorial boards for journals. The issue is authorship. How would I approach this without burning bridges with faculty from my university? Wouldn’t it be unethical to have my committee as 2nd, 3rd, and 4th author when the other university faculty members contributed more? If we decide authorship on the basis of the amount of work one puts in, the other faculty would most likely get bumped ahead of my committee. How do I gage this as a graduate student? My other option is to just not have any other faculty outside of my university contribute to my work to avoid this issue in general, but I don’t think that I’m receiving proper support from my committee for this to be publishable, which is why I want to branch out.
Authorship seems so political at times…. Any advice welcomed!