- Joined
- Feb 2, 2011
- Messages
- 8,066
- Reaction score
- 7,649
Very true. Although your article is about CNA's and yes hospitals should bring about this machinery to help move patients.
Read it again.
Very true. Although your article is about CNA's and yes hospitals should bring about this machinery to help move patients.
The bolded, wow...sooo, you actually have no idea, not having experienced it?-Not my list, just a quick google search.
-These are valid complaints, I want a belch, a mcburger w/ a dolla menu fries and a mcblizzard stat. All while the radio is on to golden oldies at max volume. They drive up and forget their order. Or the whole you're beneath me, I'm going to speak on my cellphone and expect your above and beyond service.
-Serving fries is not the same as going the extra mile to save a life. Furthermore, those people typically are a lot nicer to you and don't act as if they own you... they treat you as an actual human being.
-The only thing in common with fast food and healthcare is the insufferable people. Nothing else. Getting chewed out is not humbling, or even a worthwhile experience.
-I'm the nicest person to my coworkers ever. Literally new people love training with me, why because I'm younger, more relatable, and oh I don't force feed them anything I just teach them the job and when I fix I mistake I usually say something like I did that myself when I first started (white lies)... From what I hear fast food is mostly getting yelled at by middle aged middle management. (In other words while a hospital worker, such as me, goes out of their way to be nice, a mcboss does not) Just offering my personal take on something, not saying I'm smarter (I've been more than humble).
The bolded, wow...sooo, you actually have no idea, not having experienced it?
As for the rest, I actually cannot tell what you are trying to say in most sentences because you've used phrases such as 'those people' as if that differentiates between the two.
The last point I find hard to believe...I mean, come on, you can't even type out the sentence "I did that myself when I first started" on an anonymous internet forum without making sure that everyone knows that you were too good to actually make any such error. You have not been more than humble, and the fact that you think you have makes it even funnier to hear you speak as if you come across as this genuine, caring, nice, humble person to all of your coworkers.
This wasn't from premeds, but I heard about 7 medical students all agree that MCAT scores are graded on a curve based upon on the day you take it. Which would mean that if you take it on the same day as a bunch of smart people your score will be lower. Enormously false, and now all the pre-meds (about 200) they were talking to will think that their bad score was because they took their test on the wrong day lol.
There is literally a graph that separates nursing assistants from registered nurses.Read it again.
Their is literally a graph that separates nursing assistants from registered nurses.
Nurses are included and should be treated better, but the main point of the article is nursing assistants.
Right, but it's not dependent on how others did on your specific test day. The scores are scaled (conversion calculated ahead of time using data from many sittings) rather than curved (conversion calculated after the fact, forcing everyone from that one test day to fit a certain distribution).Correct me if i'm wrong (thankfully i've forgotten a lot about MCAT scoring), but I think the raw score (questions answered correctly) to scaled score (1-15) conversion is made before the exam, based on the difficulty of the questions randomly assigned to each section? Then the percentiles are based on how everyone else scored?
-Nursing assistants and orderlies each suffer roughly three times the rate of back and other musculoskeletal injuries as construction laborers.You said it was about CNA's. It's not. You looked at one graph and acted like you knew the entire article. You were wrong. Good job.
(...blah, blah, blah...)
I love this thread. It has survived so much drama over its 116 pages. So many stories of under-informed pre-meds being reported by those who have overheard them.
And now, the thread is amply graced with an under-informed pre-med coming here to address us directly. Speak on, gentle Spirit. Tell us more about how the world really works, you who know so much about it. Tell me more about what motivates nurses and how the only ones who work in nursing homes are the ones looking for opportunities to abuse. Tell us more about how you tell white lies so that others don't have to be too intimidated by your superiority.
Just remember, sometimes the story speaks more of its teller than of the tale.
Which simple statement? Because you've now said that to multiple people, regarding multiple posts. From where I'm sitting, it seems like you're getting told, repeatedly, that the attitude throughout all of these recent posts has been annoying, yet you keep pretending it's all some big misunderstanding of one person and one statement. One of those sounds more likely than the other...Nope, you took a simple statement and blew it out of proportion.
The end
Longtime lurker, but had to share this gem to get the thread back on track
In an accelerated intro to psychology class, a fabulous lecture about evolution and mental illness comes to an end.
Obnoxious guy in the back of the class (loudly): "I don't believe in evolution". Everyone in earshot whips around and gives the guy a look.
Girl in front: "What? How can you not believe in evolution?!"
Guy: "I dunno, it never clicked with me."
Everyone drops it and leaves, knowing that this is not worth an argument. Whilst walking to the cars, guy gets into new BMW with license plate "Doc 2B".
Still Scratching my head after that one...
42% of Americans agree with that guy, including 27% of college graduates and 37% of medical doctors (although the MD poll is ten years old). Interesting that medical doctors reject evolution in a higher proportion than college graduates overall. (caveat: I am comparing two different polls conducted ten years apart, not exactly scientific, but interesting none the less.)Longtime lurker, but had to share this gem to get the thread back on track
In an accelerated intro to psychology class, a fabulous lecture about evolution and mental illness comes to an end.
Obnoxious guy in the back of the class (loudly): "I don't believe in evolution". Everyone in earshot whips around and gives the guy a look.
Girl in front: "What? How can you not believe in evolution?!"
Guy: "I dunno, it never clicked with me."
Everyone drops it and leaves, knowing that this is not worth an argument. Whilst walking to the cars, guy gets into new BMW with license plate "Doc 2B".
Still Scratching my head after that one...
Once again:42% of Americans agree with that guy, including 27% of college graduates. Not that rare.
http://www.gallup.com/poll/170822/believe-creationist-view-human-origins.aspx
Once again:
Pretty sure there's overwhelming evidence that evolution is the most correct theory we have about the origins of life. Evolution is no more debated or controversial than vaccination (aka both evolution and vaccination shouldn't even be debated or controversial topics).because that's always the best respose to a debated and controversial topic
What is a debated and controversial topic? Evolution?because that's always the best respose to a debated and controversial topic
Pretty sure there's overwhelming evidence that evolution is the most correct theory we have about the origins of life. Evolution is no more debated or controversial than vaccination (aka both evolution and vaccination shouldn't even be debated or controversial topics).
I was thinking more origins of life, which more people disagree on.What is a debated and controversial topic? Evolution?
its the thought that countsJFC, I meant to get the thread on track and I've set it off again.
SDN gods, forgive me.
Also partially my fault with the memes - I posted them in jest, didn't realize it would spark an almost debate.JFC, I meant to get the thread on track and I've set it off again.
SDN gods, forgive me.
Sorry if I made it a debate I'm all for having fun at the expense of dumb pre-medsAlso partially my fault with the memes - I posted them in jest, didn't realize it would spark an almost debate.
Including ourselves? Sure.Can we all just agree that pre-meds are terrible?
The worst ones are the super bubbly hyper ones that want to save the world and tell everyone about it.Can we all just agree that pre-meds are terrible?
That's a Theodosius Dobzhansky quoteNothing in biology makes sense except in the light of evolution.
~Some guy
Citation count: [99999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999]
That's all.
That's a Theodosius Dobzhansky quote
That's gotta be frustratingGod, I work with an evolution denier. HYP educated, intelligent, good friend of mine, good clinician, but at times can be insanely rigid.
We're a group that loves debating with each other, but honestly said resident is usually left out of the debates. If you're the typer of person who's still a young earth creationist at 31 after 13 years of higher education and training, you're probably not the type of person to change your opinion after presentation of evidence.
Just to clarify, I wasn't denying evolution. I was just trying to point out that in my experience, the origins of life debate is a more complex one than evolution. Unfortunately, people, especially creationists, use the two interchangeably, which causes a lot of unnecessary controversy.God, I work with an evolution denier. HYP educated, intelligent, good friend of mine, good clinician, but at times can be insanely rigid.
We're a group that loves debating with each other, but honestly said resident is usually left out of the debates. If you're the typer of person who's still a young earth creationist at 31 after 13 years of higher education and training, you're probably not the type of person to change your opinion after presentation of evidence.
Just to clarify, I wasn't denying evolution. I was just trying to point out that in my experience, the origins of life debate is a more complex one than evolution. Unfortunately, people, especially creationists, use the two interchangeably, which causes a lot of unnecessary controversy.
When did this thread get so lame? Can everyone take their arguments about serious stuff elsewhere so that we can get back to laughing!
When a new strain of bacteria emerges and is pathogenic, do MD creationists think god took up the whole the creation bit on the 8th day? Do different breeds of dogs just like blow their mind?
According to Spinoza, God is the laws of nature (including evolution). They are the same thing. To deny God his separate identity and to say that God (or the laws of nature) doesn't give a care to the good and the evil of human are the reasons that he has to be rather politely excommunicated.In the sense that the origin of life is a complicated and not completely solved scientific problem? Yes, I agree.
God of Spinoza agreement with evolution vs. non-deity requiring evolution? Hmmm...sure I'll give it to you, there is an entertainable argument here
An argument that does not fully and unequivocally accept the truth of evolution? Yah, not even close, less than worthless.
We really need fresh pre-med stories
I put off a lab until my last semester senior year so now I have it with a ton of freshman students.
Her:So you've taken Ochem 2 already, what did you get?
Me: A 42%. *waits for it*
Her: But that worse than an F!
Me: With the curve I got a B.
Her:Well do you have to retake it to get an A?
Me:I'd rather die.
Oh gosh me too! I'm taking Gen Bio 2 lab with a bunch of freshmen this year. I feel like a bitter old person in this class.
One of my lab partners smeared her fingers all over the agarose culture we were supposed to grow unique bacteria on. I wanted to cry